HomeMy WebLinkAboutTimes-Advocate, 1986-12-03, Page 4Pogo 4
Timis-Advocots, Decernbor 3, 1966
FLUE
H EiUiUN
f .ARG
Imes -
dvocate
Published Each Wednesday Morning at Exeter, Ontario, NOM 1S0
Second Class Mail Registration Number 0386.
Phone S19-235-1331
cn
eNA
meli%
LORNE EEDY
Publisher
JIM BECKETT
Advertising Manager
4.1..,
BILL BATTEN
Editor
HARRY DEVRIES
Composition Manager
ROSS HAUGH
Assistant Editor
DICK JONGKJND
Business Manager
SUBSCRIPTION RATES:
Canada: $25.00 Per year; U.S.A. $65.00
C.W.N.A., O.C.N.A. CLASS 'A'
Pounding tables
Ontario's major farm organization,
the Federation of Agriculture, establish-
ed an historical first at the annual con-
vention in Toronto by electing a female
president.
That, in itself, offers no immediate
hope for an end to the economic woes of
many farmers in the province, but the
leadership of Brigid Pyke is at least ex-
pected to set the Federation on a more.
militant course.
Delegates were not overwhelming in
their support for the Wolfe Island dairy
farmer as she gained only a narrow vic-
tory over incumbent Harry Pelissero
who repeatedly warned of the "table
pounding" methods that could be ex-
pected from Pyke and her supporters.
Presumably, the majority of
delegates felt that the Federation need-
ed a new sense of direction, although
there will no doubt continue to be the
debate whether more is attained through
the carrot or stick approach to any
situation.
The first order of business for the
new president will be to mend the rifts
that have arisen during an unusual open
election for the post; and the second will
be to muster the support of more Ontario
farmers for the Federation so she can
convince those who need convincing that
her organization does indeed speak for
the majority of farmers in this province.
The Federation has been plagued in
the past not so much by a lack of leader-
ship, but rather a lack of support at the
grassroots level as various commodity
groups have headed off in their own
directions to further their own causes.
Only when farmers recognize that
their strength comes from the unified
voice will they be able to make inroads
against the economic depression that
continues to swell.
If there was more table -pounding
undertaken in the kitchens along the con-
cessions in Ontario to enlist more support
for the work of the Federation, there
would possibly be less need for table -
pounding when the organization made
approaches to the senior governments.
Pushing for change
To the obvio)Is consternation of some
and the pleasure of others, Ontario is
quickly heading into wide-open Sunday
shopping.
While the matter is currently before
the courts it is becoming rather evident
that even that may not stem the tide and
the reason is that most stores now defy
any plausible description to provide an
equitable solution to the fact that people
have a definite need to have sources of
some goods available.
Convenience stores have expanded
to the point where they present competi-
tion to even the large grocery chains;
drug stores. compete with gift outlets;
and so the list goes. Coming up with a
sensible criteria is virtually impossible
as more and more retailers move to
become all things to all people.
About the only way that Sunday
shopping can be controlled is to have a
specific list of items that can be sold on
that day. That would be nothing short of
a law enforcement headache.
If anyone has a plausible solution it
is imperative that it be presented very
quickly because the hand -writing is now
clearly on the wall.
That doesn't mean that all retailers
will have to stay open or that everyone
will have to join the move to Sunday
shopping.
That will be an individual choice.
Too much access
During the past few years, the
senior levels of government have
moved to open up the public's ac-
cess to various information
through the enactment of
freedom of information rules.
Unfortunately, recent incidents
have shown that those same
governments have been extreme-
ly lax and careless in protecting
information on individual citizens
that should have most Canadians
more than a little uneasy. --
A federal employee recently
took home income tex informa-
tion on every Canadian citizen
who had filed tax returns in the
past year and there is still some
mystery as to the intent of that
action.
However, there is even more
mystery involved in how the
employee's actions could have
been so easily undertaken and
whey it took so long to uncover the
d.
Now the provincial auditor has
found disconcerting knowledge
that their governments have been
extremely complacent in protec-
ting that personal information,
despite the fact those records
could be used for a number of
damaging schemes if they fall in-
to the hands of the unscrupulous.
The computer age has brought
forth many advantages but as yet
it appears that governments have
failed to recognize that the ease
0 4
by which they can now add infor-
mation on citizens is comparable
to the ease by which that infor-
mation can be sourced by those
who have no right to do so.
. * • • .
Ironically, it appears that while
governments are busy keeping
tab on taxpayers, they have fail-
Batt'n
Around
...with
The Editor
.err..:
ed miserably in adapting com-
puters to keep track of their own
inventories.
One could speculate that part of
the problem may be that so-
meone has stolen the computers
assigned to inventory control.
The auditor found that the
bureaucracy has been lax in
keeping track of moveable assets
and in the ministry of natural
resources alone, there were 3,500
unaccounted-for items with a
total value of $1.7 million.
The auditor selected 225 assets
from inventory listings from
various ministers' offices and 60
of those items, or more than one-
quarter, could not be located.
That include& everything from
color TVs to outboard motors,
and while it is anticipated that
some may be recovered through
an update of records, it is believ-
ed that many never will be found
because they have probably been
stolen.
It should not go unnoticed that
officials told the legislature that
thousands of dollars worth of
equipment was missing from
ministers' offices after the new
Liberal government took over
from the Conservatives. Did the
spoiled kids take home their bats
after losing the game?
• * • . •
There is, of course, some good
news in all this and it is par-
ticularly so as Ontario citizens
start to stock up their bar sup-
plies for the round of festive
parties.
Somewhere out in the province
there is some $705,000 worth of
booze that the Liquor Control
Board of Ontario has lost.
Okay, on your mark, get set.
I'll take the area south.of Sud-
buryand you can have the north
and we'll track that stuff down.
With any luck at all, the editor
won't draw a sober breath until
midway through 1987. Or, do you
suppose someone has already
beaten us to that cache?
Serving South Huron, North Middlesex
& North Lamblon Since 1873
Published by J.W. Eedy Publkations limited
"I DIP ALL I COULD --- I BLEW MY HORN AT IT!"
Put headlights
H you are like me, driving with
your headlights on all day, every
day, you don't have to read on.
There is no point in preaching to
the converted. Although you
might be interested in the solu-
tion I offer.
, .This•,column is addressed to
'$viverS who somehow believe
that they can save money by
keeping their headlights off until
the onset of darkness. It's the
energy savers I encounter every
day that I'm angry at.
What are you trying rove?
That your eyes are able to
penetrate dusk, fog, rainstorms
and blizzards? Maybe your's can,
but what about us mortals? How
do you expect us to see you and
to avoid colliding with you?
According to Transport
Canada, 120 lives could be saved
in this country alone every year
if people kept their headlights on
routinely all day. In addition,
11,000 injuries would be avoided.
The total number of accidents
caused by the "energy savers"
on Canadian roads is 38,000 a
year.
I drive an average of 150
kilometers a day. Hardly a day
goes by that I am not annoyed by
motorists who refuse to switch
their lights on when they should.
And I've had several near -misses
on the highway because of
drivers who either "forget" their
headlights or think that their bat-
teries or generators or light bulbs
would wear out too fast if they
followed safe driving rules.
Do you know what I think of
these drivers? They're amateurs,
and they should restrict their
driving to their back yard or the
occasional trip to the nearby
shopping mall - in broad daylight
only. -
The professionals, the ex-
perienced drivers, keep their
lights on all the time: most
RCMP and provincial police
cruisers, buses, trucks have their
headlights on all day. All federal
government .vsbie,Ags, including
those of the Arntadgferces, follow
the same policy.
Not long ago I was driving on
the Trans -Canada Highway in a
steady downpour. It was the mid-
dle of the day, and therefore
"legal" for cars to drive without
headlights on. After a while I
caught up with a recreational
vehicle that lumbered along at 50
km an hour. The road was
straight, and the dotted line
would have allowed me to pass,
if the vehicles approaching me
would have had their lights on.
But practically every second car
coming in the opposite direction
was chauffeured by an "energy
saver". I couldn't see it until it
was 100 meters ahead of me. I
decided to stay behind the
camper, and so did a long string
of other vehicles.
But the potential of a serious
accident, maybe a "multiple
vehicle crash", was very high.
Not because of the poor visibili-
ty, but because of thoughtless, in-
considerate drivers.
on
I think we should realize a very
basic driving fact that seems to
escape many if not most
motorists.
SWITCHING YOUR
HEADLIGHTS ON MAY NOT
HELP YOU TO SEE BETTER,
BUT IT -HELPS OTHERS TO
SEE YOU! Headlights are two-
way optical signals. They enable
YOU to see where you're going,
AND they enable OTHERS to
recognize you on the road.
So even when you can see
perfectly well where you're
heading you may be involved in
a serious accident because your
car was not properly visible. It's
worth spending a few extra
dollars for a light bulb or two,
because driving with your
headlights on might save your
'life and the lives of others.
I have discussed this with
several pmple, and here are
-some of their arguments: "I can
see perfectly well until it's com-
pletely dark; why should I turn
my headlightsrpn ? 1 don't feel
like wearing out my lights. If I
drive with headlights on in the
daytime, I forget to switch them
off, and then my battery runs
down. I think driving with my
lights on increases my gas
consumption.:."
In the long run, I think there is
only one solution: design cars so
that the headlights come on
automatically as soon as the
engine is started. If we agree that
driving with headlights is safer,
then why bother having a light
switch at all? Can we turn the
brakes off? Of course not, that
would be ludicrous.
I suggest that it is equally
ridiculous to have a proven safe-
ty device -headlights -and to pro-
vide it with an on and off switch.
Presents cruel side
When a warm soft spring rain
is falling and the wind is blowing
gently through the trees one
tends to think favourably of
mother nature and the benefits
she can bring us. Unfortunately
that same wind and rain can be
an enemy if their intensity and
volume increase.
This has really been brought
home to me this year as I have
been watching the erosion taking
place one hundred yards away
from my house along the Lake
Huron shore.
In the three years that I have
lived out here the water level has
risen by three or four feet on
calm days and much higher than
that when the wind comes in
strongly from the north or nor-
thwest. The effect on the
shoreline has been devastating.
This year has been the worst.
I took a walk along the beach
yesterday. A week ago it was all
sandy. Yesterday after a couple
By the
Way
by
Fletcher
of days of high wind and waves
the beach is covered with new
driftwood and fist -sized rocks
that make the walking a little
treacherous. Beside the beach is
a cliff covered with small trees.
These are gradually sliding down
the hill; their roots are exposed.
Every puff of wind sends sand
and topsoil flying into the air or
down to the beach below.
Layers of clay form the `toe' of
the cliff. The water has cut into
these layers and shaped them in-
to strange shapes as if a giant
sculptor has been at work.
Thirty years ago my
neighbour's father bought his cot-
tage. Then you could walk out
several hundred feet to the water.
Now he is perched precariously,
a cement wall his only protection
from the lake which is even now
cutting in and around the wall so
that it too may be soon absorbed
into the merciless waves.
Mother Nature has her cruel
side.