HomeMy WebLinkAboutTimes-Advocate, 1983-04-27, Page 4Page 4
Times -Advocate, April 27, 1983
imes -
Times Established 1873
Advocate Established 1881
Amalgamated 1924
dvocate
Serving South Huron, North Middlesex
& North Lambton Since 1873
Published by J.W. Eedy Publications Limited
LORNE EEDY
Publisher
JIM BECKETT
Advertising Manager
BILL BATTEN
Editor
HARRY DEVRIES
Composition Manager
ROSS HAUGII
Assistant Editor
DICK JONGKIND
Business Manager
Published Each Wednesday Morning at Exeter, bntarlo
Second Class Mail Registration Number 0386.
Phone 235-1331
SUBSCRIPTION RATES:
Canada $21.00 Per year; U.S.A. $56.00
- C.W.N.A., O.C.N.A. CLASS 'A' and 'ABC'
Courts need consistency
Upholding the principle that every man should
have his day in court (women too, of course) quite often
leads to a cat and mouse game with those involved and
creates some unusual situations -as last week's court
sitting in Exeter indicates.
Two charges were dismissed by the court because
the arresting officer was not present to give evidence,
while another accused who requested the same con-
sideration for the same reason was denied on the basis
he was a resident of the immediate area and therefore
could more readily attend at another time.
The aforementioned are not unusual situations at
court hearings: The amount of wasted time on the part
of policemen, witnesses, accused persons, and to a
much lesser extent, lawyers, is often ridiculous. They
are all components in the system, but getting them all
together at the same time is frequently difficult.
Naturally, there are emergencies that arise that
prevent one of those components from attending at the
prescribed time and place. That is understandable and
excusable.
However, there are many more times when one
of those components can not attend due to cir-
cumstances known well beforehand, and yet there is
no communication of that fact to the other people in-
volved and they show up in a total waste of their time.
Another aspect that is difficult to understand is the
frequency in which courts allow adjournments through
• the non-appearance of lawyers, while they appear to
41PC
BLUE
RIBBON
AWARD
1980
A
BLUE
RIBBON
AWARD
1981
be much more rigid in their stance towards policemen
and private citizens appearing as accused persons or
witnesses for either side.
Lawyers, it seems, are deemed to have more
valuable time than the other people involved, and while
their hourly. rates reflect that, it does not necessarily
follow that others are less important in the scheme of
things.
The courts should not give favor to the value of the
time of anyone at the expense of another, but obviously
should demand that those involved avail themselves
of the opportunity to communicate planned absences
with court officials so others involved can be cor-
respondingly notified.
If charges are dismissed because policemen are
unavailable, then lawyers should expect their clients
to proceed without them if they can't attend.
In the dismissals last week, the court's decision
is questionable in citing a distance factor, given the
factthe localaccused works out of town and therefore
has very few miles less to travel than the accused who
had his charges dismissed. It may have also been
worth considering the fact one of the two is a full-time
wage earner ina position of responsibility and the other
may not be and therefore the court appearance would
be less generous in that regard for one than the other.
The main point is that all should be treated equal-
ly before the law and by those in charge of administer-
ing the law.
Now you know
Canadians expecting some full-scale tax cuts in
last week's budget were denied because, as Prime
Minister Trudeau explained later, he feared they would
merely spend the money indiscriminately on imported
goods.
There may be some basis for that opinion,
especially in his concern for the money spent by Cana-
dians travelling abroad.
Trudeau's own practices in that regard are hard -
Spend it,
Many people niay find it difficult to
trust the national economy to a man so far
out of touch with modern times that he
doesn't realize today's photographers
have such new-fangled gadgets as
telephoto lenses on their cameras.
However, Finance Minister Marc
Lalonde took a stab at righting the
deplorable economic conditions this week,
and the fiasco surrounding that embar-
rassing photo session prior to his budget
delivery gives further evidence that the
government has lost control �f spending
in this country.
Lalonde had a rather simple solution to
correcting what had been charged as a
budget leak by the opposition benches. He.
merely changed the figures which had
been picked up by the camera and flash-
ed across the TV screens.
The page that had been photographed
had shown his planned deficit at $31.2
billion and his special recovery expen-
diture at $4.6 billion. His mathematics left
a great deal to be desired, however, when
he altered the figures. He added $200
million to the spending side and only $100
million to the deficit.
Most grade one pupils would have sug-
gested that if he was adding $200 million
in spending, he should have correspon-
dingly added $200 million to the deficit,
given the fact that no other figures in the
lengthy hudget document 'were changed.
The truth of the matter is that the
government doesn't have the slightest
idea of what the deficit will actually be.
Their track record indicates quite con-
clusively that they don't worry about a
few hundred million one way or the other.
They're quite pleased if they can come
within a few billion one way or the other.
« « * « «
A decision to spend $200 million to cover
a cabinet minister's plunder is one that
should be viewed with outrage by the
beleagured taxpayers. It was a flippant
ly exemplary. He just returned from a week-long vaca-
tion in Jamaica.
While he may be correct in his concern that others
would do the same, the budget was inconsistent with
that concern in that it doubled the amount of goods
which may be brought back to this country by vaca-
tioning Canadians.
That's obviously not a move designed to get more
Canadians back on the job.
or the government will
move and even Lalonde could not contain
his broad smile as he explained away the
money.
It was, after all, a mere drop in the
bucket of the government's tradition of
spend now, pay later philosophy. it is that
very philospohy that put this country in-
to economic jeopardy.
The hudget deficitwould have been ex-
BATT'N
AROUND
with the editor
cusable to a point had it signalled a quick
and drastic reduction in the unernploy-
inent figures. But even Lalonde doesn't
see the current level of 12.6 percent
unemployment dropping to any ap-
preciable extent.
There are, unfortunately, well-founded
fears that the excessive deficit of this
year, coupled with that of the past fiscal
term and those cited for the next two
years, will undermine some of the growth
potential as the government moves to bor-
row the funds and thereby put more
pressure on the market place. That could
be at the detriment of the private sector
as well as in the battle against inflation
and keeping interest rates dow.
That could serve to defeat the obvious
move in the budget to rely heavily on in-
centives to the private sector to spur the
recovery which is ljust beginning.
Lalonde faced a problem similar to a
homeowner with a large number of holes
in the roof. The alternatives are to invest
money in pots to catch the drips or to
spend that money on fixing a few of the
holes in the hope that eventually all the
holes can be filled before the rest of the
home is ruined.
His budget appears to opt in many in-
stances to the former solution. He set out
pans to catch the .leaky economic plight
of farmers, fishermen, the unemployed,
single parents, jobless young people, the
housing industry, small business, mining,
etc., etc., etc.
However, most spokespeople for those
groups indicate the assistance may be too
small to be of any great benefit, sug-
gesting that he may have tried to cover
too much at one time, and as a result,
spread assistance too thin to he of much
benefit for all but a few.
Compounding that particular problem
is the bureaucratic jungle that springs
forth to administer the programs and
eats up a sizeable portion of the money
which then does not reach its intended
destination and purpose.
The aid thereby takes on more political
overtures than economic ones and the
public opinion polls may have had more
input that some of the economic advice
the Liberals received in preparation of the
budget.
*
There are those who suggest that
Lalonde failed to spark consumer con-
fidence in his budget to spur Canadians
to get off their fat savings accounts, which
even despite economic" conditions, hit
record proportions last year.
That may be, but what those Canadians
have to understand is that they have to get
the economy rolling through consumer
purchases. They can either spend the
money to create jobs or they can face the
prospect of having their savings eaten up
with increased taxation to pay for gover-
ment handouts and deficits.
One way or the other the money has to
be put into the economy. Sooner or later
the bills have to be paid, either through
consumer purchases or taxation. The
choice is rather simple!
"We're just making sure our profit glut keeps pace with our gas glut!"
Correspondence catch up
This is neither an Old
Home Week nor a
Remembrance Day col-
umn. It is -merely a
desperate attempt to
catch up with my cor-
respondence, triggered by
a week's holiday, in which
I, at first tentatively, then
frantically, pawed
through the unanswered
letters on my desk.
Oh, yes, I' have a
secretary. But she's not
worth a diddle. She's great
on emptying ashtrays,
sorting my desk until I
can't find anything, and
telling me I'll never be a
writer until I learn to
change a typewriter
ribbon:
She also serves a great
cup of tea when I am
scriptorially constipated,
and fending off phone calls
when I sit before the infer-
nal machine in a catatonic
state. But she simply
won't get down to it, and
write my column for me.
What's the point of having
a secretary if you have to
do the dirty work
yourself? Especially when
she's practically a blood
relative; your wife?
Back to the letters. We'll
work froth about now back
through a year or two.
A letter from Orest
Woychuk of Wainwright,
Alta., hit me where it
hurts. He'd read a column
in which i referred to his
brother Roman,
'Chuck'I an old P.O.W.
buddy. Chuck is' dead;
flew into a hill down in
Quebec in 1957. We'd
planned, in our young
romanticism, to go to
Yucatan, Mexico, when
we got out of prison camp.
Chuck was reckless and
violent. I could have
predicted his end. I was
reminded of him when I
read a dedication to a
novel: "To the victim of
the Great War; among
whom are the survivors.
One of his favorite sayings
was, "If you sleep fast
enough, you can get five or
six hours sleep in two
hours."
Orest says, in
understatement, "He was
very restless on his return
from overseas - there's no
need to explain why - you
both were there and went
thru it all." Chuck had
recall as "A handsome
and intelligent young man
from Perth, Ontario by the
name of Bill Smiley." We
were both stupid to be
working for one dollar a
day, twelve hours a day,
thirty days a month. And
I am not handsome, mere-
ly distinguished. You were
Sugar
and Spice
Dispensed By Smiley
three wives and his
brother says they, "Had a
hard time catching up
with him," because, "My
home is where I hang up
myhat for a few
moments." Poor girls.
Poor Chuck.
Another old ghost turn-
ed up recently: Don
McCuaig, former private
in His Majesty's forces;
former newspaper editor,
the scourge of the upper
Ottawa Valley. For some
reason, this idiot and I
have an affinity that
transcends almost
everything. We can meet
after ten years and
thoroughly enjoy each
other's company. Silly
duffer is it France, living
in a village, taking an im-
mersion course in the
language. I canust hear
that Ottawa Valley Irish
coming through the
French. For example,
"terrible". In French it
comes out, "Terreeb",
with a little guttural on the
"r". In Ottawa Valley it
comes out, "Turbul".
Here's one from Jack
Seeley Hay River, N.W.T.
Yes, Jack, I'm guilty: i
am the guy you worked
with on the old iiamonic
on the upper Great Lakes
in 1937-38-39. But i am no
longer the fellow you
the handsome one, with
your lean face, blond hair.
Remember Peachy 'diving
off the hurricane deck.
Remember Capt. Bill
Taylor flouncing around
like a French gigolo, woo-
ing the lady passengers in
an aura of sweat and
booze? He wound up as a
bar -tender, after the S.S.
Noronic burned.
And another from Bob
Love, somewhere in Alta.
(envelope lost), a long and
friendly and warm letter
of reminiscences and
shared experiences.
And another from Mrs.
Jay Webster of Lake
Francis. Man., which tells
a lot about the state of
Canadian publishing,
book -selling, and Win-
nipeg as a cultural centre.
"Would enjoy reading the
books you mention, Boys,
Bombs and Brussels
Sprouts by Doug Harvey,
and Terror in the Star-
board Seat, by Dave
McIntosh. After asking on
the average of once a
month in the Cole Book
Stores in Winnipeg. I was
told it wasn't on the order
form so couldn't be
ordered. Somebody must
be failing in their job if
these books aren't
available west of
Toronto."
Somebody is, lady.
Canadian publishers,
notoriously timorous,
would rather spend money
onpublic relations for
their name than pushing
books with merit, but
without a big -name
author. Canadian
booksellers are generally
subsidiaries of American
or British chains. Most of
them couldn't name ten
Canadian writers to save
their souls.
In line with that, I
recently received word,
via my principal, that the
school board wants.me to
write a "rationale" for
two fine Canadian books I
put on my list: "Lives of
Girls and Women", by
Alice Munro, and "The
Wars",by Timothy
Findle.
Both of these have been
widely acclaimed. Both
are works of art. Both
were printed and written
in Canada by Canadian
writers. And I must write
a "rationale" for their ac-
ceptance. The Board
doesn't have to write a
"rationale" for question-
ing them. So much for sup-
porting Canadian writers.
More letters. A card
from my daughter, almost
three years old. "I was
thinking of you a lot as
your 60th birthday ap-
proached. I love you a lot.
Always have. Always will.
I have just begun to be
aware of the things you
have taught me: strength,
perserverance, tolerance
and humour". Thanks a
lot, baby. Just went
through the old cheques.
Sure enough.
And eleventy-seven
other letters. I'll get at
them during the summer
holidays, but don't let that
stop you. I need nourish-
ment. Drop a line and let
me know that my
secretary is not the only
one who reads this
column.
Moved by a movie
Every once in awhile
you see a movie on televi-
sion or in the theatre
which is really wor-
thwhile, one that gives you
far more in value that the
admission price. Such a
one is "Ghandi."
It's one of the ones that
makes you come away
thinking and saying,
"Boy, that was really
worth the time and
money. Not just because
of the length of it either
(about three and a half
hours.)
I might warn you before
you go to see it that there
lion for the little man who
area few scenes which are was able to inspire
Perspectives
By Syd Fletcher
a bit gory and frightening, millions of people with his
yet overall it is a story philosophy of 'turning the
which is so powerful that • other cheek' instead of
those particular scenes fighting.
are lost in your admira- It is interesting to note
that this film, a British
one, took many of the
Academy awards this
year, as did Chariots of
Fire last year, a film
which discussed the pro-
blem a Christian athlete
had with competing in the
Olympics when his event
happened to fall on a
Sunday.
Perhaps we are seeing a
good trend when films are
being rewarded for depic-
ting the nobler side of man
instead of his violent
nature.
I'm all for it.