The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutThe Goderich Signal-Star, 2009-06-17, Page 18Page A18 - Goderich Signal -Star, Wednesday, June 17, 2009 MUMCIPAL PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT REPORT GODERCH YEAR 2008 Canada's prettiest 1.1 GENERAL GOVERNMENT EFFICIENCY 2006 10.4 2007 8.5 F re Services 2008 '0.29 Bliciency Measure Operating costs for governance and corporate management as a percentage of total municipal operating costs. Objective Efficient Municipal Govemment. Notes & Key Factors for Understanding Results The formula for the local government measure was changed in 2007. 2.1 FIRE SERVICES EFFICIENCY 2006 2005 10.26 '042 80.22 Efficiency Measure Operating costs for fire services per S1,000 of assessment. Objective Efficient Fire Services. Notes & Key Factors for Understanding Results Formulas for all efficiency measures were changed In 2005 to improve the definition of operating costs. 3.1 POLICE SERVICES EFFICIENCY 2008 '230.30 2007 2006 1 2005 $211.86 499.481$211 A2 Efficiency Measure Operating costs for police services per person. Objective Efficient police services. Noot�tes�y& Key Factors for Understanding RWWftM Formulas for all efficiency measures were changed In 2005 to improve the definition of operating costs. 3.2 VIOLENT CRIME RATE EFFECTIVENESS 2006 12.68 2007 2006 2005 13.57 15.64 7.29 2004 8.23 Efficiency Measure Violent crime rate per 1,000 persons. ObjecUve Safe communities. Notes & Key Factors for Understanding Results 3.4 TOTAL CRIME RATE EFFECTIVENESS 2006 2007 2006 2006 2004 69.07 68.54 82.52 56.40 59.37 3.3 PROPERTY CRIME RATE EFFECTIVENESS 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 42.88 44.30 52.20 20.41 23.07 Efficiency Measure Property crime rate per 1,000 persons. Objective Safe communities. Notes & Key Factors for Understanding Results 4 3.5 YOUTH CRIME RATE EFFECTIVENESS 2008 2007 2006 2005 Efficiency Measure Total crime rate per 1,000 persons (Criminal Code offences, excluding traffic). Safe Objective Notes & Key Factors for Understanding Rasutts 14.88 N/A 14.90 14.10 Effectiveness Measure Youth crime rate per 1,000 youths. Objective Safe communities. Notes & Key Factors for Understanding Results The formula for youth crime was changed in 2005 to include youths who receive pre -charge resolutions such as warnings and cautions. 4.1 PAVED ROADS EFFICIENCY 2007 11240938 4474120 2005 $1146544 Efficiency Measure Operating costs for paved (hard top) roads per lane kilometre. Obje Efficient maintenance of paved roads. Notes & Key Factors for Understanding Results Formulas for all efficiency measures were changed in 2005 to improve the definition of operating costs. 77..„ rte. f?rte: 14.3 WINTER MAINTENANCE OF ROADS - EFFICIENCY 4.2 UNPAVED ROADS EFFICIENCY 2008 138384 2007 2006 GL ,•, LTi, 2005 M1465.50 Efficiency Measure Operating costs for unpaved (loose top) roads per lane kilometre. Objective. 1 Efficient maintenance of paved roads, Notes & Key Factors for Understanding Results Formulas for all efficiency measures were changdd in 2005 to improve the definition of operating costs. 4.4 ADEQUACY OF PAVED ROADS EFFECTIVENESS . 2006 2007 2006 2005 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Effectiveness MINIUM Percentage of paved lane kilometres where the condition is rated as good to very good. Objective Pavement condition meets municipal objectives. Notes & Key Factors for Understanding Results Pavement condition is rated using a Pavement Condition Index (PCi) such as the Index used by the Ontario Good Roads Association or the Ministry of Transportation's Roads Inventory Management System (RIMS). 0 11 2008 7148,49 2007 $1452.00 2008 $884.00 2005 $1388.00 Efficiency Measure Operating costs for winter maintenance of roadways per lane kilometre maintained in winter. Objective Efficient inter maintenance of roads. Results & Key Factors for Understanding it lts Formulas for all efficiency measures were changed in 2005 to improve the definition of operating costs. 4.5 WINTER EVENT RESPONSES EFFECTIVENESS 2006 2007 2006 2005 2004 100% 11 1, 100% 100% 100% Effectiveness Measure Percentage of winter.events where the response met or exceeded locally determined municipal service levels for road maintenance. Obisctive Appropriateresponse to winter storm events. Notes & Key Factors for Understanding Results 'vet tionsTransit 5.1 CONVENTIONAL TRANSIT EFFICIENCY 2008 2007 2006 2005 5.2 CONVENTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS 2006 2007 TRANSIT RIDERSHIP 2006 2005 2004 N/A N/A _., N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A WA N/A Efficiency Measure Operating costs for conventional transit per regular passenger trip. Objective Efficient conventional transit services. Notes & Key Factors for Understanding Results Formulas for all efficiency measures were changed improve the definition of operating costs services s in 2005 to Efficiency Measure Number of conventional transit passenger trips per person in the service area in a year. Objective Maximum utilization of municipal transit services. Notes & Key Factors for Understanding Results f�ti r i.1 WASTEWATER COLLECTION 6.2 WASTEWATER TREATMENT £ 6.3 WASTEWATER INTEGRATED EFFICIENCY AND DISPOSAL - EFFICIENCY ` SYSTEM -EFFICIENCY 2008 2007 2006 2008 2007 2006 2005 2008 2007 2006 2005 $98.01 $230.30 '206.69 $267.81 $351.71 780.51 '270.47 '0.00 $0.00 '0.00 '(5.18) Efficiency Measure Efficiency Measure Efficiency Measure Operating costs for the collection of Operating costs for the treatment and Operating costs tor the collection, wastewater per kilometre of wastewater disposal of wastewater per megalitre. treatment and disposal of wastewater main Objective per megalitre (integrated System). ObjectiYe s Efficient municipal wastewater treatment Objective Efficient municipal wastewater collection and disposal services. Efficient wastewater system (Integrated services.Notes & Key Factors for Understanding System). Notes & Key Factors for Understanding Results Notes & Key Factors for Understanding ResultsFormulas for all efficiency measures Results Formulas for all efficiency measures x were changed in 2005 to improve Formulas for all efficiency measures were changed in 2005 to improve the the definition of operating costs. One were changed in 2005 to improve definition of operating costs. In 2006, the megalitre equals 1,000,000 litres or the definition of operating costs. One definition of kilometres of wastewater 1,000 cubic metres. megalitre equals 1,000,000 litres or main was redefined; connections were . eliminated. 1,000 cubic metres, 6.4 WASTEWATER MAIN BACKUPS fi 6.5 WASTEWATER BYPASSES TREATMENT EFFECTIVENESS , EFFECTIVENESS 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 0 0 3 3 5 .007% 0% 096 •02296 •066% Effect veness Measure ' Effectiveness Measure Number of wastewater main backups per 100 kilometres of ' Percentage of wastewater estimated to have by-passed wastewater main in a year. treatment. Objective Objective Municipal sewage management practices prevent environmental Municipal sewage management practices prevent environmental and human health hazards. j and human heatth hazards. Notes & Key Factors for Understandkg Results Notes & Key Factors for Understanding Results fftf, i i.' / �4„ 1.{ : if • 1 ce / .r, ,r" /. , `. /,, r.,/'//v1/ ?r ;. ... , 7.1 URBAN STORM WATER MANAGEMENT 7 2 RURAL STORM WATER MANAGEMENT EFFICIENCY EFFICIENCY 2008 2007 2006 2008 2007 2006 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Effectiveness Measureh Efficiency Measure Operating costs for urban storm water management (collection, Operating costs for rural storm water management (collection, treatment, disposal) per kilometre of drainage system. treatment, disposal) per kilometre of drainage system. 5 ObjectivEfficient urban storm water mane ement. Efficientural storm water management. Notes & Key Factors for Understanding Results Notes & Key Factors for Understanding Results Formulas for all efficiency measures were changed in 2005 to Formulas for all efficiency measures were changed in 2005 to improve the definition of operating costs. improve the definition of operating costs. In 2006, the definition of kilometres of drainage system was In 2006, the definition of kilometres of drainage system was redefined to eliminate connections; catch basins were retained. % redefined to eliminate connections; catch basins were retained. Reported by municipalities with a separate storm water system. Reported by municipalities with a separate storm water system. 8.1 DRINKING WATER 8.2 DRINKING WATER ' 8.3 DRINKING .DATER INTEGRATED TREATMENT -- EFFICIENCY DISTRIBUTION -- EFFICIENCY SYSTEM -- EFFICIENCY 2008 2007 2008 2005 2008 2007 2006 2008 2007 2008 2005 $34933 $34495 W417 $25992 $054481 $311367 $2381 % '485.78 $49993 $33U3 1334156 Efficiency Measure Efficiency Measure ( Efficiency Measure Operating costs for the treatment of Operating costs for the distribution of . % Operating costs tor the treatment drinking water per megalltre. drinking water per kilometre of water j and distribution of drinking water per e ObjecUvEfficient municipal water treatment distribution pipe. objective o megalitre. (Integrated System) Objective services. Notes & Key Factors for Understanding Efficient municipal water distribution services. # Efficient municipal water system. s (Integrated System) Results Notes & Key Factors for Understanding Key Factors for Understanding Results Formulas for all efficiency measures ' Results Formulas for all efficiency measures were changed in 2005 to improve the Formulas for all efficiency measures were changed in 2005 to Improve the definition of operating costs. were changed In 2005 to improve the definition of operating costs. One megalitre equals 1,000,000 litres or definition of operating costs. `: One megalitre equals 1,000,000 litres or 1,000 cubic metres. In 2006, the definition of distribution pipe 1,000 cubic metres. was redefined; connections and hydrants were eliminated. ~Me