HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Goderich Signal-Star, 2009-05-27, Page 11Goderich Signal -Star, Wednesday, May 27, 2009 - Page Al 1
Divided we stand, united we park: The Square debate rolls on
She said...
Walking around Goderich's most fa-
mous street, you wouldn't think the act
taboo, but rather a thoroughly quaint
and enjoyable experience. Taking about
walking around the downtown core,
however, may send you running for the
nearest set of wheels.
While the controversy has quieted
down to a dull mumble in news -pages,
the subject of pedestrian -only Square
time is a touchy thing to address, it
seems.'
On a recent outing, The Signal -Star
set out to gather the real opinions of
those who know The Square best —
shoppers and businesses. •
Shop keepers, or sales people too
chatty, cheerful and chipper? No prob-
lem — ask them if they think about a
proposed return to our roots, using your
feet. That seems to be a surefire way to
illicit staunch silence, or unsure hesi-
tance.
The amount of shopping Goderich's
senior community does on weekends
seems to be the lifeblood of merchants.
Or, so it would seem from their im-
plied opposition to the occasional hour
or two of a decidedly safer downtown
experience without vehicles vying for
a space. Though few were in favor of
discussing the pros and cons of pedes-
trian -only without a veil of anonymity,
fewer were willing to talk about it at
all. The feeling of disapproval was pal-
pable.
According to one Square business
employee, "1 think it's a great idea ...
I've lived in places where some down-
towns were pedestrian -only from time
to time and it's just a great experience,
a better feeling ... etc .. I think the town
would definitely benefit from it, and
tourists would enjoy it as well." When
asked their name, however, conversa-
tion dwindled off. "My boss doesn't
like the idea, I'm sorry."
The arguments are similar from busi-
ness to business, and mostly consider
the volume of seniors shopping and
the convenience of parking. How will
shoppers get their purchases to their
vehicles without parking in front of
the stores? Is it unfair to ask them to
park a block away on a spoke street?
If that's the case, they're likely to take
their business elsewhere - the mall per-
haps, where they'll walk a comparable
distance through the parking -lot.
While the question of pedestrian -only
Square times is still up in the air, it may
be a simple lack of clarification hold-
ing progress in a perpetuating debate.
Is it every weekend, or the occasion-
al festival? Is it all day, or one or two
hours?
The bottom line is, it's hard to get a
clear sense of what's a good idea and
what's not if no one is sure what the
idea is. It's easy, however, to assume the
worst and draw your line in the sand.
(D.M.)
He sat ...
The no -vehicles on The Square debate
is like racism or religion. Everybody has
beliefs but nobody wants to talk about
them - at least not on record.
We tried, and it was tough. Businesses
were the most tight-lipped of all, though
they seemed to provide the most opposi-
tion to the idea.
With such strong opinions, I wasn't sure
why nobody wanted to go on the books
until one business owner explained he lost
customers last *time he took a stand on an
issue. If shoppers are that fickle, perhaps
what The Square offers isn't as unique as
it's touted. Maybe we need to reinvent the
wheel while we're out walking.
With money tight all over the place,
merchants on The Square want to see what
little is out there circulating downtown.
My understanding is that The Square
would only be closed to vehicles during
festivals. Many had the impression it was
to be every weekend, or during the mar-
kets.
The nitty-gritty of this will eventually
get worked out, but the lack of detail is
making people apprehensive about the
process. The biggest obstacle for people
to overcome with the concept was its am-
biguity, but what about safety?
When you drive around on a Saturday
morning, you never know when a pedes-
trian is going to pop out from between two
cars around Courthouse Park.
If vendors could unload and then park
along the outside of The Square and shop-
pers on the spokes, there are no doubts in
my mind things would be much safer for
pedestrians. But is that fair for the people
who set up booths?
Not really.
Is it fair for the stores who 'want their
customers to be able to park directly out-
side?
Not really.
Is it fair for the person with small chil-
dren who has been waiting to cross the
street for five minutes, or the seniors who
may take a little longer to cross the road
while cars.continue to circle for parking?
Absolutely.
No matter what terms are finally em-
ployed for this idea, all sides are going tc
have to do some give and take here.
Parking outside The Square will have tc
be made available and those with disabili-
ties (ie: those already using blue and white
parking stickers) should be considered.
One gentleman had a particularly good
idea (though an anonymous one) that il
The Square were to close off to vehicles.
there should be some sort of courtesy -car
type service to assist those who need it.
"You have about 1,000 golf carts in this
town," he said. "Have the town get propel
insurance and substitute free transporta-
tion for those who need it."
But who needs it and who is just ac-
customed to convenience? Provisions are
needed for the disabled, but everyone else
should take a walk and think it over.
ASKUSABOUT:
- HOME COMFORT
OilHeat, gas, A/C, filtration,
humidifier, heat pump hybrids, °eia„drA
boilers & Infloor, temporary, etc.
- ALL FUEL & LUBRICANT NEEDS
Now INCLUDING PROPANE!
ISO,
9001
CERTIFIED
CALL YOUR LOCAL OFFICE:
KINCARDINE CLINTON
398.8841 482-7381
TEESWATER GODERICH
392-61 OO,w21 59 524-8386
w.cam. Graham Dowling
PROPANE CUSTOMER SERVICE
EDWARD
FUELS
WWW.EDWARDFUELS.COM