Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Citizen, 2004-03-18, Page 5THE CITIZEN, THURSDAY, MARCH 18, 2004. PAGE 5. Other Views Ready for the brave new world One of the great things about being in a book club is being forced to read books you'd normally fling across the room. I finished such a book recently, called The Diamond Age, by Neal Stephenson. It's science fiction. I hate science fiction. Well, not true — I don't hate science fiction, 1 hate the technological zeal which infects the genre. I'm not a Machine Guy. And science fiction seems to abound in time machines, particle accelerators and bizarre phenomena with tongue-numbing names like Chrono- Synclastic Infundibula. The Diamond Age is set in a future in which every household boasts an M.C., right in there between the fridge and the washer-dryer. M.C. stands for 'Matter Compactor'. You need anything? A pair of pants? A new mattress? A pizza all-dressed? Just dial it up on the Matter Compactor and in about as long as it takes a vending machine to spit out a diet Coke, the object of your desire materializes before your eyes. When I got to the last page of The Diamond Age I thought: "Huh. Imagine having the imagination to imagine something as far-out as a 'Matter Compactor —. Then I picked up a copy of National Geographic and discovered that Neal Stephenson and I are a little behind the times. Matter Compactors already exist. The official name is 'digital fabricator' but proponents just call them 'fabbers'. Industrial fabbers are already old hat. Forensic scientists and anthropologists use them to make three-dimensional replicas of human bones from digital models. Car Ontario's Liberals are turning again to promising "modernized" drinking laws to divert attention from issues that embarrass them, but they sound like they have hoisted a few glasses themselves Premier Dalton McGuinty says he favours allowing diners to bring their own bottles of wine to restaurants because it would be cheaper for them and, grandly, more civilized and a 'coming of age for Ontario.' Consumer Services Minister Jim Watson added that diners also would be allowed to take home partly-drunk bottles to save still more money and, not to be outdone, this would help bring Ontario into the 21st century. The Liberals want to distract voters from concerns, such as Finance Minister Greg Sorbara having been a director of a company now being investigated by police, as well as their inability to pay for some of their promises because of a deficit. This strategy has had some success and many are licking their lips at the prospect of an -- , opportunity to drink cheaply, particularly when it is portrayed as a new freedom. It reminds of the last Liberal premier, David Peterson, winning power partly by promising to allow wines to be sold in corner grocery stores and acquiring an image as a reformer, although he never did it. McGuinty's plan has a surface appeal because diners could save through buying wine at liquor store prices to avoid the markups restaurants add, and take along a favourite wine that a restaurant may not stock. But it has downsides the premier did not acknowledge. If restaurants do not supply customers with their drink — and they might not notice when one slips his own bottle on a table — they will not know how much the patron drinks and be able to exercise some control. Restaurants need to worry because courts have held them responsible for acts committed by those who have been drinking on their manufacturers in Detroit routinely fire up fabbers to create small car parts from digitally- rendered artists' sketches. According to Neil Gershenfeld, we've only just begun. Gershenfeld is the director of a division called The Centre for Bits and Atoms at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He believes personal 'fabbers' are not only possible, they're just around the corner. He foresees the day when you and I will each have an in-home gizmo that can whip us up a cell phone, a clock radio — even a computer. "It's like taking the tools of the factory and putting them in your own home". Gershenfeld compares them to your computer printer. The way it will work, he says, is you'll sit down and design something - a footstool, say = on your desktop, then just punch the "Print" (or "Fab") button - and presto, out pops a brand new footstool. How does that happen? Where does my Fabber get the leatherette? The wooden legs? The carpet tacks? Damned if I know. All I do know is that Big Thinkers and Technoboffins already act like this is old news. Ind4ed, Freeman Dyson, a world-renowned professor of physics at Princeton and one of the world's Biggest Thinkers, foresees the day when we will be using fabbers to create new life-forms, like 30-foot geraniums or weird premises, but the public also stands to ,lose some protection. Some diners will drink more because it is cheap and become offensive to others wanting quiet conversations and family meals, or buy fries and sit drinking all night, changing upscale restaurants into drinking dens. If diners are encouraged to take home their half-empty bottles, even some who drank little, inevitably will drop them in darkness or snow and ice and leave glass scattered dangerously. A few will drink the last drops and toss bottles on the streets and anyone who disputes this does not know human nature. Having thousands more people, some inebriated, carrying bottles opened or unopened on the streets at night is not exactly conducive to safety. Ontario law also currently forbids carrying open bottles in an attempt to prevent drinking on streets, but anyone found doing so will be able to claim he is returning from a restaurant and police will be unable to disprove this, even with lengthy, time-consuming investigations. The Liberals paint restaurants as gougers who sell wine at unnecessarily inflated prices and fail to recognize they have substantial costs ranging from buying or renting high- traffic locations to employing staff to cook and serve. Restaurants recoup these outlays by charging markups in what they sell, as do all retail businesses from groceries selling bread to clothing stores selling shirts, and no-one is pets — say, a 200 pound chihuahua. (Hey, if it ever bit you, you could throw a saddle on it and ride for help.) Dyson says the possibilities are endless. "You could imagine growing furniture," he says, "if you could persuade a tree to grow in the right shape." Sounds insane, does it not? But think for a moment. Think of the world as it was not long ago. People got ,around (if they got around at all) with horses. There was no such thing as an airplane in the sky, a motor boat on the water or a tractor in the field. There was no television. There was no radio. Vast areas of the country didn't have electric light. Things we take for granted - instant replay, shrink-wrap plastic, nylon stockings -would have been as alien as a spaceship from Betelgeuse. When was this — The Dark Ages? Elizabethan times? No, this was less than a century ago — an eyeblink in time. There are people living today who can remember that world. And we needn't go back that far. A mere 20 years ago I would have been pecking out these thoughts on a manual Olivetti typewriter on two-part Canary typing paper. And if someone had interrupted me to chat about the internet, e-mail, websites, blogging or laptops, I would have assumed I was talking to the chief purser from a space ship just in from Betelgeuse. So I'm not laughing at the idea of Matter Compactors and 'fabbers'. I'm keeping an open mind so that I can be ready for the Brave New World on our doorstep. And I'm taking positive, concrete steps to make sure I'm ready. First thing tomorrow, I figure out how to program the VCR. suggesting they should be forbidden their markups. The rate of failures among restaurants also is much higher than for any other type of business — walk along a busy street and look how often they close and reopen with new names and new owners. This suggests they are not making huge profits, and would need to recover what they lose through diners bringing their own bottles, by substantial corkage or other charges just to survive, leaving diners no better off financially. McGuinty says there are other jurisdictions that allow diners to bring their own bottles without problems, but a lot more don't, for good reasons. McGuinty did not mention any of these things, but it is more appealing to promise new freedoms, Letter THE EDITOR, I am writing this letter to encourage the community to get involved in the Block Parent program. • A couple of weeks ago my child was stopped by a stranger who proceeded to ask him personal questions. This made my child feel uncomfort- able and he ran away and told me. The police were involved but nothing came of it. We have no idea what this man intended, but that's not the point. The point is this happened in OUR community. We need to talk to our kids about these things and make sure they know what to do and then we need to do something ourselves. As a Block Parent you are doing something. You are saying "I will be there to help if help is needed". So please call Sheila Hallahan at 523-9668 and get involved in the Block Parent program. Name withheld. Reality at its better At first I thought I was just living vicariously through them. That is until I recognized that while I may envy the paycheque, I have neither the stomach nor the personality to do what they have to do to get it. No, I'm not talking about something wild or sinister. It's actually much worse. I'm hooked on The Apprentice (I'm shocked too) a new reality series. Survivor one through 1,000, Fear Factor, Average Joe, Blind Date, My Big, Fat, Obnoxious Fiancé. Reality shows are everywhere on the television and, with the exception of the final episode of the original Survivor, which I was forced to watch because a houseguest couldn't miss it, I have successfully avoided them. That one instance affirmed my contention that producers of the vast wasteland had completely given up on integrity. Or for that matter the intelligence and decency of their audience, a group, whom it has apparently been determined, likes nothing better than to watch people at their worst, and witness their humiliation and embarrassment. The Apprentice is a little different in that it takes place in a world we already assume to be cutthroat. Contestants compete for the opportunity to run one of Donald Trump's companies. As teams they work on projects ordained by The Donald and each week one person is fired. Promo commercials stirred in me a mix of bemusement and irritation. I couldn't imagine any reason why I would want to watch arrogant aliens from the corporate world taking on pretentious challenges. And Donald Trump's over-sized ego quite frankly makes me a little nauseous. However, long before Seinfeld, ThJrsday night was must-see TV at our home. From the time my oldest was a little guy we made an event of Thursday night television with potato chips and chatting. The channel never moved beCause from 8 p.m. to I I p.m it satisfied first a need for family viewing, then later for some quality drama. Thus when The Apprentice followed the favourite network fare I found myself in a conundrum. Old habits die hard it seems because despite my aversion I just couldn't bring myself to turn the channel. Within moments I was fascinated; by show's end, hooked. And every week since I've been trying to figure out why. While all of the people were chosen in part because they have achieved a level of success, it bothers me that the majority are quite pleasing to look at. It's equally bothersome that the ones who are less so were the first to be fired. But, it's fun to watch these people. As mentioned they were successful before the show and sometimes you just have to wonder how. Just like us regular folk would when given a task such as discovering an artist and selling his work, a contestant can look like a doofus, be clearly out of his or her depth, making insipid suggestions, contributing nothing but wrong moves. Yet, as long as his team doesn't lose he will return next week and amazingly be the star this time around. Then too the moments of brilliance are as interesting to see as the machinations and conflicts are entertaining. But while other reality shows are personal, this, as they say, is business, which I guess is better. It apparently makes it a little more palatable to me anyway. Drinking in the 21st century