The Citizen, 1999-06-02, Page 5A funny thing
happened on the
way to election
Ninety-eight per cent of the adults in this
country are decent, hard-working, honest
citizens, it’s the other lousy two per cent that
get all the publicity. But then - we elected
them.
- Lily Tomlin
Ah, the anti-politician bandwagon is an easy
one to hitch a ride on, but I’ll pass this time.
The poor slobs we send to Ottawa and to our
provincial capitals have enough people
slagging them day and night without my added
tuppenceworth. Truth is, I don’t have high
hopes for any politicians. These are people
who usually started out as lawyers - and went
downhill from there. I don’t expect them to
reflect qualities like honesty, scruples or
integrity.
Hell, I’d be happy if politicians were just a
little funnier. I’d settle for comic relief.
There was a time when politics and humour
knew how to dance. The greatest comedic
putdown in the history of the English language
sprang from the lips of a British political
malcontent by the name of John Wilkes.
Working the internet
When I started writing articles back in the
1950s, I sent them off by mail and hoped they
arrived. In the 1980s I took a quantum leap in
getting my articles to their rightful place.
One of my duties was to write an editorial
five or six times a week for the Stratford
Beacon-Herald which provided me with a
portable word processor connected to the
phone line.
I typed the editorial, proofread it and sent it
via the phone line to the newspaper’s
computer in Stratford. When the editor
arrived, he called it up on his screen and took
it from there.
What a real improvement from the old
typewriter and mail routine!
I now do my writing sitting in front of a
computer flanked by a printer and a scanner.
The thought occurred to me that this
equipment might eam some additional income
but I must admit the first opportunity arrived
much more quickly than expected.
I came across some info on the Swiss air
force provided by a British company and
noticed a couple of small errors. Off went a
correction to the company.
In short order a reply came back thanking
me and asking me if I could upgrade this
force’s history going back to 1914.
I accepted and the next three weeks were
dedicated to just that.
Not all assignments have come as easily as
that one.
Wilkes was responding to a slur from a
political enemy, the Earl of Sandwich, who
had told him: “'Pon my word, Wilkes, I don't
know whether you'll die on the gallows or of
the pox.”
To which Wilkes silkily rejoined: “That
must depend, my Lord, on whether I first
embrace your Lordship’s principles, or your
Lordship’s mistresses.”
Somehow I can’t hear Mike Harris voicing a
comeback like that.
The Brits of course are past masters at the
art of political wit - none more so than the
grandmaster of the century, Sir Winston
Churchill.
Churchill, who once cast a withering gaze
across the floor of the House of Commons at
the honourable Leader of the Opposition and
pronounced him, “a modest little man ... with
much to be modest about.”
Churchill, who once described political skill
as “the ability to foretell what is going to
happen tomorrow, next week, next month and
next year.
And to have the ability afterwards to explain
why it didn’t happen.”
We’ve had our share of witty politicians on
this side of the water - mostly in the past, alas.
Abe Lincoln was a pretty funny guy.
Homely too - but he didn’t sweat it.
“The Lord prefers common-looking
people,” said Lincoln. “That’s the reason he
makes so many of them.”
Lyndon Johnson, despite outward
appearances of classic Crude OF Boyism -
But two thoughts occurred to me: more
people are opting for the self-employment
route as they come to terms with the rapid
economic changes taking place in our society
and they are realizing the advantages that the
internet provides in marketing their services or
products.
To give you an idea of how some people are
actually going about this, I started looking for
a good example. Again one dropped into my
lap totally unexpectedly and I had my
material.
The person in question is Karen Brown who
lives in Exeter. She was previously general
manager of the London Downtown Business
Association but the changes in the nature of
the business improvement areas made her job
redundant.
As a single parent with two growing
daughters, she looked around for something
that would keep her closer to home.
Having worked with her mother to find
proper utensils for use in the kitchen, she
realized how difficult it was to find ones that
could be used easily by those people facing
some physical challenges such as MS, stroke
or arthritis.
Providing a supply to this demand proved to
be the challenge she was looking for and so,
her company, Help Mates, was bom.
Not only does Help Mates sell tools to make
kitchen chores more manageable, visitors to
the site will also discover items to assist with
other everyday tasks such as dressing,
grooming and even maintaining social
activities.
She soon realized the demand for such
utensils was truly international.
To date she has, on her web site, received
hits from as far away as Japan, United Arab
had a sharp tongue on him.
“Oh, Gerry Ford’s a nice enough guy,” he
once said of the I.Q.-challenged future
president, “He just played too many football
games without a helmet.”
Here in Canada, humorous politicians are
about as plentiful as palm trees ... but the few
we’ve had weren’t half bad.
Sir John A. McDonald to political colleague
D’Arcy McGee: “Look here, McGee, this
government can’t afford to have two
drunkards. You’ve got to stop.”
John Diefenbaker on political polls: “Polls?
I have no time for polls.
“You know what dogs do to poles....”
Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau to
Progressive Conservative critics in the House
of Commons complaining about his new
swimming pool: “You may come over at any
time to practise your diving.
“Even before the water is in.”
Mostly though, when our Canadian
politicians enter a duel of wits, they go in
barehanded. As in the case of Mitchell
Hepburn, one-time Liberal premier of Ontario.
Speaking from the back of a manure
spreader to a group of farmers during a
political campaign, Hepbum decided to try to
be witty.
“Gentlemen,” he announced, “this is the
first time in my life that I have spoken from a
Tory platform.”
From the back of the crowd came the growl
of a farmer. “Throw ‘er in low gear, Mitch,
she’s never had a bigger load on.”
Emirates, Hong Kong, Australia and all over
Europe.
Not surprisingly, the largest single number
of inquiries come from the U.S. These
international inquiries make up from one
quarter to one half of all her hits.
It is fair to say that only the internet could
have given Karen such a broad spectrum of
potential customers.
She has been helped too by such places as
rehab centres.
I asked Karen if she had any advice for
people thinking of using the internet for such
businesses. Her answer was that it would be
especially suitable for niche products or
services.
Once you have a web site, it is important to
maintain an up-to-date service, providing the
variety that keeps it from growing stale. It is
also essential to constantly incorporate lessons
learned from previous transactions, to add or
delete items wherever necessary.
With Karen’s entrepreneurial spirit, it is easy
to see why she is a natural for the internet.
If her product line interests you, why not
give her a call at 1-888-771-0977 or email
sales@helpmates.on.ca Better yet, visit the
catalogue on line at www.helpmates.on.ca
A Final Thought
Nothing can add more power to your life
than concentrating all of your energies on a
limited set of targets.
- Nido Qubein
THE. CITIZEN, WEDNESDAY, JUNE 2, 1999. PAGE 5.
The
Short
of it
By Bonnie Gropp
What’s left after the right
Tomorrow I will cast my vote for the
provincial election. That I will cast my vote,
there is no question; which way it may go is
quite another matter.
Without getting too specific so as not to be
accused of attempting to use this medium to
sway voters (not that I believe I have that
much influence, but just in case), I will say my
choices have been whittled to two candidates.
My reasons can be simply explained by
drawing an analogy to what is expected from
people in the professional or corporate world.
After all, government is a business of which
we regular folk are to be the boss. Let’s not
forget, who does pay politicians’ salaries. So,
if we caught an employee lying to us, or
making false promises time and time again,
would we forgive or would we terminate their
employment?
If an employee fails to deliver, if they in
some way disappointed, what would be the
reaction? Would it not be a costly mistake for
an employer to give anyone who uses
company money for their own gain, or who,
during their tenure actually cost the company
money, a second chance?
What company can survive if its staff is
arrogant to the consumer, gives favours to
their friends, plays power games with sub
contractors or takes actions that result in a
number of job losses?
Those questions easily answered I was left
with one definite deletion. And, though
integrity and politics are not traditionally
words I think likely to be used in the same
phrase, I have put my faith in two candidates.
Unfortunately, I cannot vote for two. Thus
for the past week, knowing right is wrong, I
have been doing some mental sparring on
what I am left, and further left, with.
In retrospect I have noticed historically that
on the federal side, my tendency has been to
vote for the candidate I feel will best represent
my interest. Yet, I realized with interest that
on the provincial side I have cast my vote for
the person at the top.
My dilemma, therefore, is that this time I
am not sure either leader instills in me a sense
of confidence. There have been weaknesses
exposed on both sides, offering me no clear
choice.
So I look to the candidates, one of whom I
know well and admire, one I know virtually
not at all. I have listened to their platforms and
feel strongly that each is genuine. Therefore, I
suppose some of my confusion results in
whether my vote is personal. When two seem
equally favourable is familiarity an acceptable
method of choice? My conscience makes me
feel this may be a bit frivolous.
Conversely does my conscience cloud my
perspective, making it difficult for me to see
my acquaintance is indeed the best choice?
So I ponder and I weigh, I choose one then
the other, all with the knowledge that come
election day the decision will be made in the
exact second it takes to mark an X.
Such impulsiveness does not bother me
overmuch as it will not have occurred without
cogitation. It will bother me far worse if my
vote does not have the effect for which I am
hoping, because if I’m certain of one thing, it
is there is no right answer in this election.