HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Citizen, 1994-10-19, Page 5I Arthur Black
THE CITIZEN, WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 19,1994. PAGE 5.
You’re not nuts —
the movie
business is
Do you find you're having a little trouble
at the movies these days - trying to
distinguish what's real from what isn't, I
mean?
Don't get down on yourself about it.
You're not nuts - the movie business is.
Consider: A brand new John Candy movie
came out a few weeks back. It's called
Wagons East and stars Canada's favourite
funnyman as the besotted, buckskinned
leader of a wagon train of settlers in the
mid-1800s. The hook is, they're heading east
to get away from the Wild West.
Which is a pretty funny premise, and
should make for an entertaining flick,
especially with roly-poly Candy lolling
around in the saddle.
There's just one problem: John Candy's
dead.
What's more, he died more than half a year
ago, on the set.
More than half of Wagons East was shot
after the star of Wagons East was no longer
available for camera work.
How did they do that? Simple. Hollywood
faked it. They used several John Candy
lookalikes with their hats pulled low or their
backs turned. They hired an actor who could
imitate his voice to fill in the necessary
dialogue.
International Scene
Why so many
casinos'?
It wasn't long before the politicians of
Detroit, taking a look at how much money
was allegedly fleeing the state of Michigan
and finding its way over to Windsor, decided
that it was time^to have yet another vote on
the establishment of a casino. Three previous
votes had turned down the idea but, in the
light of the new evidence showing all that
money flowing into Canada, another vote
was held and this time the concept was
approved.
Small wonder that the good people of
Detroit got so excited. It could not have
escaped them that, in the short time the
Windsor casino has been in operation, it has
earned $20 million for the Ontario
government. It doesn't take much mathe
matical knowledge to work out how much
that will mean in a year and, at a time when
governments all over North America are
short of cash (i.e. running big deficits), such
figures get in the way of rational thinking.
But Michigan has just joined the eight
other states that have already got into
gambling and which have seen almost $400
billion wagered during the past 12 months,
which is about $65 billion more than the
previous period of time. Who really has been
winning? Well, certainly not the gamblers as
a class; somebody has calculated that in the
same 12-month period which I mentioned
above, the losses could be expressed as $300
for every household in the United Slates.
You don't hear statistics like that very
often from the groups that arc in favour of
establishing yet more casinos, but there is
definitely another side to the story which, I
think, needs to be aired. Much of this other
Hey, presto. Candy rides again.
Such reincarnation isn't even new. Earlier
this year another star, Brandon Lee was
killed in a gun accident while filming a
movie called Crow. The producers didn't
even have 30 per cent of the film in the can
when Lee died. They needed his face and his
body in at least seven crucial sequences in
order to make the movie believable. Could
they pull it off?
Sure - with the help of a little computer
magic. Computer experts isolated Lee's face
on one screen, then "painted" it digitally on
to the neck of the body of another actor who
then performed the movements Brandon Lee
would have, had he been alive.
End product: Lee in a scene in which he
never appeared.
There are lots of other examples. Did you
see Forrest Gumpl You remember the
double amputee, Gary Sinise?
In real life Gary Sinise can do the Hully
Gully better than you and I. He's got two
perfectly useable legs. They were
"amputated" by computer for the film only.
In the film True Lies, the opening scene
shows a beautiful mansion beside an
unspoiled lake which sits at the foot of a
series of snow-capped mountains.
And it's a fake. A collage.
The mansion sits in Newport, Rhode
Island; the mountains are part of the Sierra
Nevada in California and the lake is nowhere
at all - computer animators created it out of
electrons.
The weird thing is, when you look at the
By Raymond Canon
side has to do with social costs and they are
not significant.
It goes without saying that people get
addicted to gambling just as they do to other
things. Ten years ago it was calculated by
Gamblers Anonymous that there were 3
million compulsive gamblers in the United
States. At the present time this number is
believed to have risen to over 10 million
with 1.3 million being teenagers.
The money that these 10 million, not to
mention the other less committed gamblers
spend is not extra money; for every million
dollars, say, that is spent in the casinos, the
same amount is lost to other segments of the
economy.
This means that, if you frequent a casino,
the money that you gamble will be money
that you would have spent buying clothing,
various services or eating out. To cite one
local example, if the Ontario government
calculates that it has earned $20 million in
revenue from the Windsor casino, it should
not for a moment consider that to be extra to
what it would normally earn without the
casino.
Taken into consideration must be the tax
revenue lost when people gambled instead of
buying things like clothing, etc. Add to that
the additional policing costs and the net
result is not even close to 20 million.
Such calculations are the same regardless
of where the casino is located, in the United
States or in Canada.
The Americans have also taken to
riverboat gambling. What happened there?
One community in Iowa spent $1.2 million
to develop port facilities for the boats that
plied the Mississippi River. Unfortunately
the expected wealth did not roll in; instead,
other centres further down the river decided
to get into the business and the boats that
would normally have come to Iowa gave up
the idea in hopes of increased revenues
elsewhere.
scene - you can't tell any of that.
What's it mean, the fact that the
Truth/Reality divide is blurring even more?
I'm not sure, but it's pretty scary.
We are being systematically taught not to
believe our eyes. And we're learning. A
survey a few years back showed that 12 per
cent of Americans don't believe astronauts
ever landed on the moon. They believed it
was an elaborate PR exercise orchestrated by
NASA choreographers somewhere in
wilderness Arizona.
What happens when we no longer trust
anything we see? Well, we'll become more
passive I guess...like graduate Couch
Potatoes.
That too, may be happening. Last month a
crowd of tourists at the Mont-Saint-Michel
Abbey in France stood by like a herd of
Holsteins and watched a woman drown
trying to save her child.
The mother was walking with her six-
year-old along the beach when her child fell
into water-filled hole. As the frantic mother
tried to save it at least a dozen tourists stood
and watched without trying to assist her or to
call for help.
They probably thought it was a mini
drama for visitors. If they thought about it at
all.
Finally, rescuers from the town managed
to save the girl. They couldn't reach her
mother.
And one of the tourists - an American
lugging a VCR - was heard to murmur "I
got the whole thing on tape.
So much for the alleged pot of gold' at the
end of the rainbow.
I think by now you get the point. While
there is undoubtedly a little bit of the
gambler in everybody, the situation has now
reached the point where it does not just
provide a bit of entertainment, it is
approaching the mania stage.
Have we become a civilization that is
hooked on the "something for nothing" idea
as if our financial problems were going to be
solved by lotteries and casinos. Hands up all
those who can honestly say that they have
won more than they have spent in their quest
for instant wealth.
Do you think that the situation is any
different here than it is elsewhere? The
people of Spain, France, Britain,
Switzerland, Germany, etc. all take part in
sport pools, lotteries and the like and the vast
majority of them come out losers - just like
their Canadian cousins. To my mind any
commercial that emphasizes what you can
win when you gamble is as misleading as the
one that states simply that one product is 20
per cent better than another.
In neither case are you being provided
with full facts.
Got a beef?
The Citizen welcomes
letters to the editor.
They must be signed
and should be
accompanied by a
telephone number
should we need to
clarify any infor
mation.
The
Short
of it
By Bonnie Gropp
Sex and
local politics
The little town was in an uproar— Ellie
Walker wanted to run for councillor.
Last week an episode of The Andy Griffith
Show proved to be rather timely with
municipal elections coming up. But, my oh
my, Aunt Bea, did it ever show how times
have changed.
It's decades ago in the tiny town of
Mayberry and municipal elections are
approaching. Andy has good naturedly
arrested a fellow who drinks too much and
who thinks the only way to keep his wife in
line is with a punch now and then. Now,
while Andy doesn't exactly cotton to this
approach he does enjoy a little chuckle about
the whole situation.
However, when Otis draws it to Andy's
attention that his own Ellie has decided to
run for council things aren't so funny. He
becomes even more nervous after his Aunt
Bea says that a woman councillor will make
them just like city folk. Then with pressure
from some of the Mayberry men, Andy
agrees to try and talk Ellie out of "this
foolishness". As he walks out of the office,
he is taunted by Otis's words of wisdom.
"You can talk if you want, but when it
comes to women the only thing that will
work is to hit them with a leg of lamb."
What results is a classic unenlightened
battle of the sexes with the men holding
back the money and the women refusing to
cook, clean and do laundry.
As a longtime fan of The Andy Griffith
Show, I have always enjoyed its simplicity
and old-fashioned outlook. However, this
one aspect of the pre-60s movement was
something I would have been happy not to
be reminded of.
It was mildly reassuring that by the show's
conclusion, Andy had seen the error of his
ways and with grudging acceptance told the
men that even though Ellie was a woman,
she was also a person and had every right to
serve on Mayberry's council.
This sort of backhanded acknowledgement
wouldn't make Andy and company very
popular these days. Though some women
today still feel they are not treated as equals,
I think even the most disgruntled feminist
would have to admit radical changes have
occurred over the past three decades.
Notwithstanding the members of the female
sex in provincial and federal governments,
locally there are two women running for
reeve of their municipality and three of the
five candidates for one township council are
women. Of the two villages and six
townships we cover, all but two
municipalities have at least one female
candidate.
Whether male or female the job of a
municipal policitican is one that is not
always easy. Elected officials will often find
themselves caught between two sides with
no easy answers. They must answer to the
people they represent and follow the dictates
of higher government.
Compensation is minimal for the hours put
in and the thanks received. It will ultimately
tum the idealist into a realist.
It is good to see that in many of our
readership municipalities there are enough
candidates to hold an election so that
ratepayers have a chance to choose their
officials. I commend the candidates, male or
female, who are volunteering time and self
to represent their municipality. Whether they
are up to the challenge remains to be seen,
but if they do fail most would agree sex
should have nothing to do with it!