Loading...
The Rural Voice, 1998-08, Page 27company then chances are the son, when he takes over the family farm, will follow in his footsteps," said Hutchinson. The underlying principles of mutuals have been of co-operation and self help. When they first started, a mutual policyholder was asked to sign a premium note agreeing to assume certain liabilities of the company which were directly proportionate to his limit of protection. The whole idea was to get neighbours together so they could share risk. When a fire occurred, the mutual company assessed the damages, collected the money needed to cover the injury directly from the policyholders and paid the person who had suffered the loss. If the company didn't have enough money at the time it could evoke the money needed at year-end from policyholders. Any money a farmer paid was taken off his next year's premium. It was like an extra payment in advance. The notes were on three per cent of the farmer's premium. For example, a farmer with a $100 premium note could be asked for three per cent of his note. The farmer would then have to hand over $3, a lot of money at the time. While the notes were rarely used, over time regulators suggested mutual companies adopt uniform methods of payment in order to ensure protection of the company and fairness to the individual policyholders. The next step was to adopt a plan whereby companies could estimate future losses and costs as a basis for rates. Under this system, payment on the premium note was only made when expenses exceeded the estimated cost for the year. Mutual companies moved away from this system of assessment and started collecting premiums in advance. In 1975, the premium note was discontinued in favour of the Fire Mutuals Guarantee Fund. At present, there is between $1-2 million in the fund. The fund is there to bail out a farm mutual company that is on the verge of bankruptcy. The fund has rarely been used but companies know it is there if needed. Up until the 30s fire losses were the primary concern of farm mutuals and many companies have still kept the reference in their names. As times changed and farmers started demanding more protection for their buildings, machinery, livestock and crops, individual mutual companies, wanting to lessen the burden of insurance on their companies, started sharing portions of their risk with each other. This process known as re- insurance soon became compulsory. In 1959, an effort was made to make the process of reinsurance more efficient. That year the first Canadian -owned reinsurance company was formed. As insurance risks increased in value with the beginning of hydroelectricity and more expensive farm equipment, a province -wide pool system of co- insurance among companies was seen as the best way to insure individual companies' financial stability. Every year McKillop in Seaforth pays close to $600,000 to the reinsurance company to protect the • Farm Residential Commercial AM Automobile howiCk MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY Wroxeter, Ontario NOG 2X0 (519) 335-3561 NEIGHBOUR TO NEIGHBOUR INSURE WITH • CONFIDENCE Comprehensive farm and home insurance coverage right in our own community GERMANIA FARMERS' MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE CO. Ayton, Ont. NOG 1CC 519-665-7715 AUGUST 1998 23