HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Citizen, 2019-05-30, Page 5Other Views
The shelf life for a website? 5 years
The world’s suffocating in plastic Shawn
Loughlin
Shawn’s Sense
In the coming weeks, North Huron
Publishing will unveil three new websites:
one for each of its major publications.
The Citizen, The Rural Voice and Stops
Along the Way will all have their own space on
the internet, replacing northhuron.on.ca as the
one-stop shop for the publications.
The change comes approximately five years
after North Huron Publishing unveiled its new
website in 2014, replacing an even older site
that had been around for years.
What does this mean for loyal readers? Well,
first and foremost, you need to know the new
addresses.
For the past year or so, the URLs
stopsalongtheway.ca and ruralvoice.ca have
been directed to their respective part of the
North Huron Publishing Company website.
We now add huroncitizen.ca to the group,
which will direct to, you guessed it, The
Citizen.Don’t worry, northhuron.on.ca will
still direct you to The Citizen as well, so you
don’t need to change your bookmarks.
While it may seem like just yesterday that
we updated our website, bringing it into the
modern era (and trust me, if you feel that way,
there are a few of my co-workers who share
that sentiment), the sad fact is that five years is
a long time on the internet. Heck, five minutes
can be a long time on the internet if you
accidentally start reading comments.
All jokes aside, five years is a long time for
a website to remain the same and, while we all
loved the new interface and amount of control
our then-new website gave us over what
information we could share and how we could
share it, that new website smell wore off.
What once was new and cool in our eyes has
become a little clunky and some of the
features just don’t work as well as they used
to. I’m sure everyone over the age of 30 can
relate to that, if my experience is any guide.
With the new websites we came to the
realization that, while there is undoubtedly
a lot of crossover between people who read
the three publications, they do serve
different purposes. The Citizen, for example,
is something that people can visit every
day and find something new to read about
Blyth, Brussels and the surrounding
communities.
Stops Along the Way, however, has a clearer
mandate of providing tourism information,
which makes it require a different kind of
website and, to be frank, a more simplistic
user interface to speed people along to their
destinations.
The Rural Voice will be similar to The
Citizen, but with more of a focus on
agriculture.
One of the big additions to our web presence
with the three new websites is for advertisers
as, once we implement web advertising
sales, we will be able to help advertisers
target their ad dollars a little bit more
effectively. Previously, the few advertisements
that we did have on the page could be seen
by people looking for agricultural news,
local news or tourism information. Now we
will be able to make sure that everyone who
sees an advertisement will be its target
audience.
On top of that, it will help us here in the
editorial departments of the three publications
to better help people find interesting
information. By virtue of Citizen articles
having their own corner of the internet, you
can be sure that everything you see online at
our website will have the same focus: local
news for people in our coverage area.
There are a lot of reasons I’m excited about
this project, not the least of which is, like the
last website update, I’m driving a significant
portion of the work ahead of it. Alongside
Publisher Deb Sholdice, I’ve looked at what
works on our website and what doesn’t and
decided what the new website should look
like.
Things are changing. There’s no getting
around that. The new sites will all feature a
cleaner user interface designed to be less
cluttered. On top of that, we’ve also gotten
away from a one-size-fits-all photo space
which, to be honest, didn’t really fit all the
photos we wanted on the website.
Some of the changes won’t be readily
apparent to readers, like the improved backend
user interface that, with a little continuing
education for folks in my office, will hopefully
make maintaining the website easier.
There are also new style guides being
implemented which will help make sure that,
within each of the three sites, we’re adhering
to new layout guidelines to make for the best
possible experience for our readers and
advertisers.
In the end though, the thing I’m most
excited about is the fact that The Citizen,
alongside Stops Along the Way and The Rural
Voice are moving forward, and putting a new
focus on digital content and advertising. You
might think that comes from my role with the
website, but it really comes from me being a
reporter. I’m excited that, with a new forum,
we will be able to better distribute the hard
work we do on a weekly basis.
So don’t be surprised when you log on to
The Citizen’s website in the near future and
notice a big difference. It just means we’re
evolving to serve you better.
Denny
Scott
Denny’s Den
THE CITIZEN, THURSDAY, MAY 30, 2019. PAGE 5.
You are the problem
Where could I possibly be going with
this one? Because, really, we are the
problem in so very many aspects of
life. Whether it’s climate change, the troubling
political direction of the world (fueled, in
many cases, by xenophobia) or any number of
issues, we have no one to blame but ourselves.
This week the problem we represent is one
of being resistant to change in our
neighbourhoods, very often for selfish reasons.
Here at The Citizen, Denny and I cover
developments and planning matters handled at
local council meetings. Whether someone is
wanting to build a shed or a new barn or open
a business, they need to go through the process
of ensuring it will comply with the rules and
maintain reasonable living conditions for
neighbours. Another aspect of daily life here at
The Citizen is writing about all of the people
who are opposed to these proposed changes.
So, while planning is in place to ensure
things are compatible and pleasing to all
residents, complaints can often go too far,
leading to disgruntled neighbours standing in
the way of changes and, sometimes, progress.
The latest was at Central Huron Council last
week. A closed church may very well be taken
down to be replaced with a 60-unit senior
living complex. Sounds like a great addition to
the community, right? Especially in Huron
County with its high percentage of seniors.
Well, it didn’t sound like a great addition to
everyone. There were a few neighbours with
the common refrain in situations like these:
increased traffic, reduced parking on the street
and, frankly, one man said, he moved to rural
Ontario for a certain way of life that involved
a quiet street and plenty of parking.
You hear that last one a lot. Sure, it would be
nice to have that development, but how will it
impact my neat little corner of the world? The
second someone moves to a rural area, they
instantly become the mayor, dictating terms.
I have heard this dozens of times. I could
cite many recent examples just in Blyth.
Outdoor concerts that would bring thousands
of people (and their money) to the village were
protested for being too loud, opponents said.
There were the people who had concerns
about the new subdivision in the north end of
Blyth. Then there was the fire hall. We had a
petition when it was proposed on North
Street – that was, of course, before the other
petition and the massive uprising in the middle
against the ball diamond location proposal.
There was resistance to the new houses in
Belgrave. Not only were people upset about
losing their park (which wasn’t a park), they
didn’t like the look of the houses, nor did they
like that they would attract – hold your nose
and cover your mouth – renters. There goes the
neighbourhood. (Extreme sarcasm intended.)
That’s not even getting into the neighbourly
squabbles that are commonplace in these
situations. Neighbour A wants to build a shed,
but that might threaten Neighbour B’s quality
of life, so the arguments begin.
Those are just a few examples, but getting
back to this column’s title, rural Ontario
residents can be their own worst enemy at
times. Things change. We need to grow the tax
base, we need people to move here, we need
stores, services and businesses, so don’t make
life a living hell for those brave enough to
invest their money in your community just
because you thought you were buying a time
capsule instead of a house.
If you want your community to grow and
progress, you need to be supportive of that
change, rather than leaving it up to everyone
else while you live happily in your bubble.
While the Canadian media, in months
past, searched hard for scandals to
embarrass the government, it paid
scant attention to a real scandal – the 1,500
tonnes of Canadian garbage that has been
rotting in Manila, Philippines since 2014.
Last week the federal government finally
announced that the garbage would be coming
home, to be incinerated in a plant near
Vancouver that generates electricity from
burning garbage.
After two Canadian governments failed to
act, Philippines’ President Rodrigo finally got
Canadians’ attention by suggesting he’d
declare war on Canada if we didn’t take back
the garbage and recalling his country’s
ambassador.
The garbage was packed in 69 shipping
containers marked as plastic for recycling in
facilities near Manila, but when the containers
were opened they were filled with raw garbage.
The private company that shipped the garbage
certainly wasn’t about to take the garbage back
so the federal government was stuck with the
problem. Sadly both the Conservative
government of Stephen Harper and the
Liberals under Justin Trudeau didn’t make it a
priority to clean up this Canadian mess.
This whole episode has typified the crisis
we find ourselves in as a result of our modern
consumer society. With our modern packaging
and throw-away culture, we’re burying
ourselves in garbage. We fill up landfills in
what seems like a jiffy, then people fight when
municipalities want to turn a neighbouring area
into a new landfill.
To extend the life of garbage dumps,
municipalities embraced recycling, but issues
like the Philippines scandal resulted. We began
shipping plastics to China and other Asian
countries for recycling. At the beginning of
2018 China banned the importing of plastic
because it had more than enough already there.
Since then, plastic waste has flooded into
Thailand, Malaysia and Vietnam, often through
disreputable operators, leading to dumping and
open burning, contaminating water supplies,
killing crops and causing respiratory illnesses.
The plastic issue is an example of passing
the buck. For manufacturers, plastic is often the
most profitable solution. Take the situation
with some food products, for example. Plastic
jars are cheaper than glass jars so they use
plastic. Once it leaves their plant, it’s not their
problem.
We consumers get that jar and use
the product that’s in it and want to dispose of
the container. Consumers tend to think that
plastic is plastic. I only discovered that isn’t so
while doing a story years ago on a company
that turned bale wrap into plastic lumber.
Every plastic has a different chemical
composition, they explained to me, and
if you’re a company wanting to reuse it, you
have to have plastic made up of the same
polymer. That’s not so easy in household
waste, which is why your municipality gives
you a list of what is, and what is not,
acceptable. (Then there’s the problem of
convincing people to clean the container before
its recycled so it’s usable.)
So we throw our plastic jar in the blue box
and now it’s the municipality’s problem to deal
with. But markets for different polymers
change quickly and plastics that had value last
week are sent to the landfill this week. And
sometimes, the ultimate pass-along of the
problem is to export our mess to other
countries.
Canadians, according to a 2017 Canadian
Geographic story, each produce 720 kilograms
of garbage a year, more than any other
industrialized country (seven per cent more
than Americans). We are particularly addicted
to plastic. We use 3 billion single-use plastic
bags per year – the average length of use being
20 minutes. Scientists estimate it takes 500 to
1,000 years for that bag to break down.
Just in littering alone, Canadians create a
29,000-tonne problem. It’s also estimated that
10,000 tonnes of plastic enter the Great Lakes
every year. If the world doesn’t clean up its act,
some scientists estimate that by 2050 there will
be more pounds of plastic than fish in the
world’s oceans.
What can we do? We can stop pushing the
problem off to the next guy. Manufacturers
need to take responsibility and reduce plastic
use by legislation if they won’t use their
consciences. We need better ways to reuse
plastic, creating plants here in Canada to do the
job instead of sending waste to Asia. It’s been
estimated this would create thousands of jobs.
As well, if we could properly recycle materials
here at home, it’s been estimated this could add
$11 billion to the economy.
And finally, we consumers must reduce the
plastic we use. We can choose products with
the least wasted plastic. We can cut our own
use of plastic bags. We can reuse containers.
We can properly recycle. We each need to take
responsibility for our share of this massive
problem.
Keith
Roulston
From the
cluttered desk