HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Citizen, 2019-01-31, Page 5Although much of the discussion around
the updated Canada Food Guide when
it was released last week was about the
emphasis on more vegetables, fruits and beans
and less meat, eggs and milk, there was
another recommendation that may be more
difficult to implement than persuading meat
eaters they really like lentils.
The new guide doesn’t simply suggest
what we should eat, it also recommends how
we should eat – particularly that we should
cook more often and that we should share our
table with family and friends.
Such a suggestion wouldn’t have been
necessary back in 1942 when the first Canada
Food Guide was introduced, or even in many
of the revisions released since. Until relatively
recently it was simply natural for most food to
be cooked from scratch and eaten at home.
Much has changed since then.
At one time mothers generally stayed home
and one of their tasks was to plan and cook
nutritious meals for their families. Often even
a stay-at-home mom’s social life might
include meetings where a home economist
might suggest new foods and recipes that
would increase variety in her family’s diet
while meeting nutritional requirements.
Our world has changed since then.
Generally, today, both parents work. Their
children are often involved in more sports,
clubs or part-time jobs that keep them on the
run. The common complaint is that people
don’t have time to cook and that the whole
family is seldom home at the same time to
share a meal together.
Yet not all modern western countries have
the same attitude, even if they face the same
time constraints. Writing in last Saturday’s
Globe and Mail, Laura Calder, cookbook
author and former host of a Food Network
program on French cooking, tells of the
culture shock she experienced when she took
her North American attitudes toward food
along when she moved to France. It is a
foundational belief of French culture that
eating good food at your leisure with friends is
vital, not just to individual health and well-
being but to society. Because of the
importance French society places on eating
well, people make it a priority and find the
time to do so.
Here in Canada, too often we see eating as
refueling ourselves for more important things
like work. Sometimes I think our ideal eating
pattern would be the human equivalent of
those giant tanker aircraft that can transfer jet
fuel in mid-air to other jets so they don’t have
to waste time in landing to refuel. We see
taking time to eat as unproductive.
This attitude is reinforced through
advertising by companies that produce meals
for people who see themselves as too busy to
cook. Meanwhile line-ups lengthen at drive-
through windows of fast food chains as people
convince themselves that they don’t even have
time to go inside to order. More and more
meals are eaten outside the home because we
convince ourselves we’ve no time to cook.
Whenever the subject of eating more
healthy food is raised, there are sure to be
complaints that nutritious food like fresh fruits
and vegetables is just too expensive so people
have no choice but to eat convenience food.
Seldom do people take the time to explore
healthy options like using less-expensive
frozen vegetables instead of out-of-season
fresh vegetables.
There are other options, depending on the
size of your family. In our house, where there
have been just the two of us now for nearly 20
years, Jill continues to cook meals large
enough to have once fed our family of six.
After the initial meal, she packages and
freezes the leftovers in meal-sized portions
that she can pull out of the freezer and have a
home-cooked meal in minutes. (This won’t
work with some of our relatives because they
refuse to eat leftovers.)
If we examine our priorities, shouldn’t
eating well while we share conversation with
our family top any other use of the same
amount of time? Aside from bringing the
family together, studies show that sharing a
meal with others has such side benefits as
higher grades and literacy rates, reduced
depression and addiction, improved
relationships and greater open-mindedness.
I suspect, though, that persuading people to
change their lifestyle will be harder than
getting them to change their diet. For one
thing, in a society currently obsessed with
everything new, getting people to cook and eat
as a family at home seems old-fashioned. It’s
much easier to get people to adopt the new
idea of a plant-based diet.
And yet I can’t help thinking that cooking
meals at home with simple ingredients and
then eating them together as a family would be
far better for our health than banishing meat,
eggs and milk.
Other Views
A lens through which to look back
Keith
Roulston
From the
cluttered desk
The food guide’s hardest change Shawn
Loughlin
Shawn’s Sense
In this week’s edition of The Citizen, we’ve
taken highlights from our previous
Throwback Thursday Facebook posts and
some previous images that haven’t been seen
anywhere else since their publication date to
show our loyal readers the way things were
between one and five decades ago.
In case you’re not familiar with the idea
behind Throwback Thursday (or #TBT), it
offers an opportunity for social media users to
post nostalgic photos or posts from years past
as a way of keeping the memory of said post or
photo alive.
Before you read any further, go check out
those pictures later in this issue. See what
things looked like in the past and see if you
recognize any familiar faces. Really, go. I’ll
wait.
Welcome back. Throwback Thursday has
primarily been my initiative. It goes hand in
hand with the “Looking Back Through The
Years” column that is on page four of each
issue of The Citizen, but focuses on the images
of the past instead of the news.
As I’ve gone through the past, I’ve seen a lot
of important events that happened in the Blyth
and Brussels communities, but I’ve noticed
that the majority of the pictures we post that
generate a lot of traction (a term meaning
people interacting with the image, be it
through commenting or “liking” it) aren’t
necessarily the photos associated with big
news stories.
Routinely, our Throwback Thursday posts
are our biggest attraction on our Facebook
profile. We have between 2,000 and 13,000
people seeing the images I upload. Those
numbers are only rivalled by some of our
biggest stories.
That realization led me to start looking at the
images and trying to see what people are
interested in and the results may surprise you.
While there are the obvious popular photos,
like pictures of teams from years past in which
everyone tags friends and family members,
some of the other images are much more
personal ones that result in entire families
discussing the photo in the comments.
Normally, I’d advise anyone to stay away
from any comment sections on the internet.
Truly, there is no greater hive of scum and
villainy than the comments below YouTube
videos or contentious news stories. Our
Throwback Thursday posts, however, seem to
bring out the best in humanity, including
smiles, fond memories and recollections.
While Shawn and I joke that we know when
a Throwback Thursday post goes up because
our phones start vibrating every 10 seconds,
it’s good to see that The Citizen’s community
is so interested in what the newspaper, as well
as its predecessors, has done for the past
century (though there aren’t many images in
those truly ancient editions of the local
newspapers).
It’s a refreshing realization because, going
in, I was very worried that these posts and
pictures may end up going unnoticed, or worse
yet, I may end up opening old wounds for
people. As I’ve come to find, however, even
with images that contain a lost loved one,
people are happy to see them and happy to be
reminded of the people they have had in their
lives.
Aside from that realization, it has really
made me evaluate what I consider to be “the
big pictures” of the newspaper.
Sure, I take a lot of pictures of smiling kids
playing on the playground (or, in last week’s
issue of The Citizen,playing indoors due to the
cold), but I never thought how much of an
impact those photos may have five, 10 or 20
years down the line.
There was a disconnect between what I
know as a journalist (that photos attached to
news story should be a priority) and what I
know as a person (people like seeing people
they know).
Some months back, just after my
grandfather, Retired Major Frank Golding,
passed, I was sitting in my grandmother’s
living room scanning old pictures of him for a
slide show for his visitation and funerals.
The images were of a man I had only really
known in his 70s and through to his mid-90s. I
was either too young to remember or not
around before that.
It was an uplifting experience, digitizing
those images and getting to see his life through
those pictures. I’m sure at some point I had
viewed him as a young man, but, to be honest,
until I was going through photo after photo,
following him through his life, had it dawned
on me just how much of a story he had to tell.
It also dawned on me, in a bittersweet way,
that it was too late to ask for that tale.
It seems silly that I wouldn’t have connected
that experience of my own with our
Throwback Thursday posts until recently,
when I started thinking, which ones should we
share on Facebook and which ones should we
put in print. It seems silly, but here we are.
So take another look at the Throwback
Thursday page in this week’s issue of The
Citizen, then go on Facebook (and if you need
to ask your children or grandchildren for help,
do that, because as annoyed as they may seem
now, I guarantee they won’t feel that way
looking back) and check out what once was.
You never know what you might remember.
Denny
Scott
Denny’s Den
THE CITIZEN, THURSDAY, JANUARY 31, 2019. PAGE 5.
What’s in a mandate?
What is a government’s mandate?
What should politicians be funding
with taxpayers’ dollars? This age-
old debate is at the heart of a democracy, but
there will always be as many answers as there
are citizens, which is why defining council’s
mandate can be a dangerous exercise.
At last week’s North Huron budget meeting,
for example, Councillor Chris Palmer said that
council’s mandate was to pave the roads of
East Wawanosh and to fix snowplows. With
the diversity and complexity of a community,
it’s hard to point to one, single mandate and
say it’s more important than another.
Remember the Howson Dam conversations?
A handful of Wingham residents wanted
council to spend as much as $7 million to fix a
dam so they could enjoy some time on the
water. To them, a 126.6 per cent increase to the
budget (Treasurer Donna White said one per
cent of North Huron’s 2019 budget is $55,287)
was worth it for a little “R&R” on the waves.
You might surmise then that those folks, for
example, may not care about East Wawanosh
roads or snowplow repairs.
Right now, Brussels residents are facing a
community centre renovation and expansion
expected to cost $4.5 million. While not on the
tax bill, that’s a large cost that could divide
residents. A parent of four hockey-playing
children may see the project as a priority,
while an older couple who hates sports may
feel there are better ways to spend their money.
It all comes down to a resident’s priorities,
activities and lifestyle.
Paving smooth, immaculate roads can really
add value to a community. However, if there’s
no reason to visit a community (or move there
because it offers nothing of interest), those
roads could prove to be a waste of money.
Blyth Festival Artistic Director Gil Garratt
and I have had numerous conversations about
this mindset when it comes to governments
providing funding to arts organizations like
galleries, theatres or public art installations.
Some will argue that a government has no
business pumping money into the arts, while
others, like Garratt, will point out that not only
do the arts help keep a community healthy, but
they also have a very real economic impact on
their communities as well. Nowhere is this
more obvious than in a community like Blyth.
For the tens of thousands who come to Blyth
every year, the Blyth Festival is important to
them, but for Blythites who have lived their
whole life in the village and never attended a
show (I have spoken to such people, they
exist), perhaps funding for the Festival isn’t
atop their priority list for their government.
The creation of a “non-essential” tourist
attraction can have a profound impact on a
small community. Ask Blyth residents about
Cowbell Brewing Company or Brussels
residents about the Four Winds Barn. People
visit and move to places for a myriad of
reasons – to ignore the majority of them is a
mistake. To forget you govern a community of
nearly 5,000 individuals is a mistake.
No doubt budgeting for municipalities is
getting harder every year and tough decisions
have to be made, but the floor should always
be left open for debate. To dictate the
municipality’s priorities to ratepayers, without
seeking any input from them could be a
slippery slope. At what point are you imposing
your priorities on ratepayers who may not
share those exact same views?
North Huron Council has a full plate, so
dictating priorities to a community in the first
few months of a term might lose some crucial
stock in the court of public opinion.