Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Citizen, 2019-01-10, Page 5Not having any connection to the Girl Guide movement anymore, I had no idea that there was an internal war going on within the organization between the local people who do the work and the people at the Ontario headquarters. It’s a sad day for an organization that has been an integral part of most Canadian communities for more than a century. Three of our daughters were Guides when they were young. My wife, Jill, was a Girl Guide leader during those years. And of course Sheila Richards, co-founder of The Citizen, was a pillar of the movement, from being a Guide leader in Burlington before she and her husband Wendell moved to Brussels, to serving at the national level and being awarded the organization’s Medal of Merit. But like many such organizations, the Girl Guides was in decline. Between 2000 and 2007 membership had dropped from 71,500 to less than 40,000 in Ontario. The answer for the Girl Guides’ Ontario Council was, as it so often is, in greater “efficiency”. The organization had a multi-tiered structure with local districts, divisions and areas leading upward to the Ontario Council. It’s safe to say that probably most leaders saw their own troop as the centre of Girl Guides with the superior levels in place to serve local needs. The Ontario Council did not see it that way. They saw all those levels as a barrier to getting things done. In 2007 the council undertook “The Transformation”, dissolving the districts and areas and transferring their assets and $3.2 million in funds to the provincial head office. As happens so often in these attempts at efficiency, the bureaucracy swelled. Staff in the Toronto office grew from 26 to 98 full-time positions. The payroll tripled to $4.5 million. For the people in charge, the problem was not the increased staff but the cost of running and maintaining 33 Girl Guide camps it had taken over from the district organizations. The council decided they needed to be sold. One of the camps sold was Camp Keewaydin, near Kintail where my daughters went to camp all those years ago. Taxpayers in Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh might appreciate the change since there’s bound to be more tax revenue from the tech millionaire who bought it for his country retreat than from the camp. Not all the local Guide organizations went along quietly with the loss of the camps, however. Local volunteers in several areas, who had bought, set-up and maintained the camps for decades, actually went to court to prevent their closure. A lawyer for the council warned one local group to stay away from their camp. “The owner has not given your clients or anyone else permission to use the camp property. If they do, they will be trespassing.” Since Girl Guides still depends on local unpaid leaders to make the organization run, fighting with those volunteers doesn’t seem a great policy. When volunteers protested the closure of one camp and got media attention, the council saw itself as the victim. “It’s not a civil tone to take your five-year-old daughter and have her crying at the chain link fence,” the council’s head complained. Despite the ongoing sales of these camps, the Ontario Girl Guides Council has run deficits nine of the past 12 years. I have some sympathy for the council members. They are dealing with changing times. Many young girls are more interested in spending time inside keeping up with the latest on social media than in going outside in the fresh air, learning about nature. It’s also getting harder and harder to recruit volunteer leaders among busy young adults today. Still the Girl Guides Ontario Council seems to have fallen prey to a common delusion that the grassroots is there to serve the centre, not the other way around. The future of the Girl Guides depends on finding energetic and creative leaders in each community – dynamic people who can attract young girls back to Guiding. You can’t do that from head office. Over and over again, the founding model of Canada was the mobilization of local communities to create services they felt were needed by their community. Take schools, for instance. Although there has long been provincial funding and the province provided quality control through visiting inspectors, schools were very much locally run by local volunteer trustees until the 1960s. Then, in the name of efficiency, the province set up county boards of education, then enlarged them to regional boards. Today, many communities have no schools at all. Few people feel any sense of ownership or responsibility for their school. If you want buy-in, you need involvement and commitment at the local level. Good luck to you if you forget that lesson as the Girl Guides seem to have. Other Views Taking resolutions one step at a time Keith Roulston From the cluttered desk Local comes first to ensure success Shawn Loughlin Shawn’s Sense Despite the arbitrary nature of our calendar, we’re all in agreement that Dec. 31 and Jan. 1 are good days to think on the past year as well as the year ahead. We look back on all we achieved, or didn’t, as the case may be, and we consider what awaits of us in the year to come. I guess it’s kind of fitting that, as I struggled to find something to write about in this space for this week, others may be paralyzed in making decisions about the opportunities that lay ahead of them. See, writer’s block is a tough thing for me to deal with and, given the fact that many students, businesses and municipalities were taking a break the first week of this year, inspiration was tough to come by, until I realized that writer’s block can be its own inspiration. Creative roadblocks can come in many forms, and one of those forms is having too much to consider to put pen to paper (or fingers to keyboards) and start to create. Sure: that wasn’t what I was dealing with last Friday, sitting in my easy chair of the living room pondering what to put in this space, but it is something worth noting: sometimes we’re faced with so much, that we don’t even know how to start. Looking at the last issue of The Citizen for 2018 can be indicative of that. In years past, that Christmas issue has represented a huge hurdle for the editorial department to clear: between Christmas stories, Grade 1 interviews and regular news for the paper, not to mention the dozens of Christmas and holiday-themed events near the end of the year, figuring out where to start can be difficult. With easily a dozen stories to write, picking out what to work on first can be as daunting as writing the story itself. That’s a form of creative block that we have to deal with that can be just as difficult as not knowing what to write about. The same kind of indecision can plague those looking ahead to the next 12 months when trying to determine what this year can bring to them. Sure, we’re all going to say, “I want to live healthier”, but what does that mean? Diet? Exercise? Drinking more water? It can be a tough thing to nail down. We can also say we’re going to focus more on happiness, but, again, that can mean any number of things, depending on the person. Happiness for me can be sitting with my daughter watching PAW Patrol or Mickey Mouse Clubhouse. I doubt people without children look forward to those kinds of television shows. There is a solution, though: start with what’s right in front of you. When we were preparing the Christmas issue, I started by writing the interviews and Grade 1 questions that I had most recently completed. I would sit and write shortly after my interviews were completed to prevent me from running headlong into an insurmountable wall of work. Dealing with the opportunities of a new year can be tackled in the same way: look to what’s right in front of you. Want to pursue happiness? Then look at what you can do at home to make yourself happier. Maybe that means keeping some more guilty pleasure-type foods around for a quick pick me up, or, maybe it means the opposite: getting rid of all those chocolates, treats and holiday leftovers so you won’t eat them and feel guilty after the fact. Want to be healthier? Well maybe getting rid of the treats can help with that as well: two birds, one stone. Or maybe you can make a small change: buy a good water container and start increasing your daily water intake. It’s simple and, if the internet is to be believed, by cutting out soda, fruit ‘drinks’ and caffeinated drinks, you’ll start to feel and live healthier very quickly. Want to focus more on family? You don’t need to plan a week-long getaway to Disney World, you just need to make an effort to shut off the television, put away the phone and spend some one-on-one time with each other. I’m a bit hypocritical in suggesting these simple solutions because I’ve been told, on numerous occasions, that I like to make things more difficult for myself than they need to be. The term ice-skating uphill comes to mind during those conversations. That said, as I’m getting older, I’m realizing the wisdom in eating the elephant one bite at a time. If you sit there trying to figure out how to best chow down, you may never get around to the job itself. So look forward to the new year, loyal readers, and tackle the small things, and if that doesn’t make enough of a change, at least you’ll be building up to the bigger challenges. Denny Scott Denny’s Den THE CITIZEN, THURSDAY, JANUARY 10, 2019. PAGE 5. First things first For Christmas, my mother gave me a lovely framed map print of Ireland – a special edition created in conjunction with A Course Called Ireland by Tom Coyne. He walked the perimeter of the country over the period of a few months, playing dozens of rounds of golf along the way, documenting his life on and off the course. There is a flag on the map for every course he played there. Coyne has signed the print, along with an inscription that reads, “The dog was going to be a problem.” Showing the gift around the tree, I was asked more than once what the inscription meant. Because I’ve read the book, I knew it to be the first line of the book. Out of context, however, it means absolutely nothing. Rewind to when I said it is the first line of the book. When you first read the book, there is no context. Those are the first words you read in A Course Called Ireland. As I said, I love the book, so I’m not running it down. Coyne’s time in Ireland was one reason that made me want to go there for our honeymoon. He connected with some of the most beautiful people and storied landscapes the world has to offer, but you wouldn’t know that awaited you by the first line of the book. So, while I love my mother’s Christmas present and the book that inspired it, on the wall of my home it will serve as a constant reminder of one of my biggest pet peeves in the world of writing: attention-grabbing, out- of-context first sentences that intrigue, but serve as literary islands – all sizzle, no steak. Many writers, especially in magazines or longer newspaper pieces, are partial to these ledes; cloaked in secrecy, but urging the reader to follow the author down an alley where, trust him, all will be revealed if you put in the time. Now, I’m not denigrating these writers here. It’s a conscious, stylistic choice to write that way and, if anything, they are on the right side of the trend as more and more writers utilize this tool in their writing. It’s just not my way. It’s lazy sensationalism. A quick spin through the Rolling Stone website (reading Rolling Stone’s features growing up, I’m convinced, is where I picked up this pet peeve) yields first sentences like “It had the vibe of a campaign event, even if it wasn’t one” and “The plan was to sell flowers” among others. By contrast, last year I finally got Jess to read a book I recommended (to say she and I are on opposite ends of the literary spectrum would be an understatement – I like, admittedly, boring non-fiction, whereas she likes splashy murder-mystery thrillers), In Cold Blood by Truman Capote. I told her that, in that book, Capote’s writing is the epitome of descriptive storytelling, not to mention a masterclass in building tension page to page. The first paragraph richly and vividly sets the scene in just a handful of words with skill most writers would kill to have: “The Village of Holcomb stands on the high wheat plains of western Kansas, a lonesome area that other Kansans call ‘out there.’ Some seventy miles east of the Colorado border, the countryside, with its hard blue skies and desert-clear air, has an atmosphere that is rather more Far West than Middle West. The local accent is barbed with a prairie twang, a ranch-hand nasalness, and the men, many of them, wear narrow frontier trousers, Stetsons, and high-heeled boots with pointed toes. The land is flat, and the views are awesomely extensive; horses, herds of cattle, a white cluster of grain elevators rising as gracefully as Greek temples are visible long before a traveler reaches them.” Now that’s how to set a scene. “Cherish all your happy moments: they make a fine cushion for old age.” – Christopher Morley Final Thought