HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Lucknow Sentinel, 1984-11-30, Page 73
Lucknow Sentinel, Wednesday; November 28, 1984 ---Page 7
4. a r. admits residents will have real to c�inplain.... .
•from page :3
Walden: I happened to visit the Goderich
plant just recently and the employees say
they do have odour and they do have
complaints. When we were there we could
smell it, too.
Steve Burns. I'm not saying,that. when
you are on the site, that you cannot smell
it. Traditionally, it is considered that the
odour is not offensive and you have to be
on the site ,to smell it. The guidelines,
which the ministry of the environment has
established, have been developed through.
experience with literally hundreds•of these
facilities.
Walden: Has Chester Finnigan been.
fully informed with respect to the
complete ramifications of this project? I
understand Chester understands there will
be no 'access road across his property and'
that he will be able to crop .over the top of
the sewage tile bed. Fie told • me that
yesterday. He says that the blueprint
Burns Ross showed me. is not the' same.
blueprint..he was shown, • .• .
Brophy: Unfortunately,, without •Chester
'here to explain exactly -what ;he ,under-
stands the matter to be, we cannot goany
further than we have with Jim speaking on
his behalf:
Walden: hi seleetion is it fair -to only
consider purchase price 'rather than
resident proximity?
Burns Ross: Economics is only one
factor. Certainly you have to: meet the re-
quirements for isolation and we thought we
had done that.. We :have met the require-
ments of : the ministry for isolation.
Walden: What is your opinion on devalu-
ation of homes which are mostly new in the
area?
Steve Ross: I . am not a realty appraiser.
This is just my personal opinion which is'
probably prejudiced. It would' 'be my
opinion that there will be rio devaluation.
Going on the, experience in other commun-
ities, they are building very expensive
homes very close ' to sewage treatment
plants. The only way that you would be
able to 'prove devaluation one way or the
. other would be to have an appraiser assess
(your property)..
Walden: Of. the plants that I have
visited,this is very much closer ° to our
• residences than- any I have seen so far. It is
definietly closer to our homes than what
the plant is in Goderich and there, are
• complaints from the owners of the homes. I
was told that by people working on the site.
- Steve Burns: Certainly there are com-
plaints. I certainly would never say that
people here would never complain. There
will undoubtedly be events that occur from
time to ,time that there is an odour
associated with it,
Herb Clark, Lucknow village councillor:
Eldon -Mann and myself niade a trip over to
Goderich with the purpose to have a look at
their plant: The engineer has told us the
plant in Goderich is 40 times the size of the
one that ' we are talking about, here. The
man who works at the plant took Eldon and
I on a tour, and showed us the whole opera-
tion. -I wouldn't have known I was in a`sew-
age treatment plant if I had gone in there
blindfolded. We asked him about- comp-
laints and he said he had one complaint
from a lady who lived behind there.
We went to ask some of the residents
who lived around the plait because as you
know some of the finest houses in Goderich
are built right around this area and their.
yards come right up to it. And Eldon and 1
checked with . different residents there ' in
the area and there . is no problem.
Walden: Is Lucknow council planning to
extend Place Street further south to service
the area?
Murray: I'm not aware.of•it. I talked with
• Mr. Finnigan :.yesterday and he . never
mentioned this problem with the access
road. It was never brought up The built up
area of this facility is to be built just south
of the fence which runs along the south end
of the• Snobelen property.
The day that we were on the site, Mr.
Finnigan asked how he was to get down to
the river to cut the grass along the river
and it was agreed at that time that there
would be like a farm laneway. The Snob-
elen land would be the property of the town
and it would continue to be leased out to be
cropped. There' would not be anybody
working over the tile bed. ,
This was one concern of Mr. Milne's. He
understood that he was going to grow crop
on this tile land. It was in the agreement,
that he couldn't in black and white and I.
don't know why he didn't understand it.
He could not graze over the file bed.
Getting back to. Mr. Zinn's comments. I
realize we have a problem. ,But without
providing sewage facilities for our down-
town area and cultivating new business
how will . we service• the recreational
facilities :and the religious facilities in the
town. We have a lot of things we have to.
. service and we don't collect taxes on the
$75,000 homes in West • Wawanosh' town-
ship. We have a problem: I even suggested
annexation but it was too expensive: We
certainly .want :development. I see nothing
wrong with the real nice homes to the south
of Lucknow and, to the east. I don'ti know
how we are going to, service them.
Walden:'I am not disputing that we need
sewers in the downtown area. I question
why come out -there to a prime; residential
area. ' • 1
Murray: • I don't ,think you can truthfully
stand there and say that is a ,prime resid-
ential- area :where that treatment facility is
going to be built.
it was never my intention to. wish any-
thing on. Wawanosh . township. We asked
Treatment tanks will be open to prevent problems.
'from page 1
Up to this point in the five years
Lucknow Village Council has been studying
,the proposal to build a subsurface treat-
ment system, members of council have
assured' the public that everything would
be enclosed and the only: component of the
treatment process which would be above
ground would be a small building to' house
a blower to pump' the air supply to the
equalization and storage tanks.
., Burns said a 10 foot high chain link
security fence topped with barbed wire will
surroundthe facility. Inside the facility,
hand rails surround the open . tanks to
prevent employees working in the area
from inadvertently falling into the tanks.
Burns' said the facility is no different
Sewage treatment facility
includes. several components
•SPS
The proposed Lucknow sewage treat-
ment facility to be located ih West
Waw anosh Township, just south of the
village of Lucknow includes ' seven
possible components.
The influent works; a series of open
concrete channels, five or six feet wide by
20 feet long, are designed to remove grit
and sand from the sewage as it flows into
the system. Metreing of the flow can also
be done at this point in the system.
The flow equalization tank, measuring ,
12 feet by 12 feet by 10 feet deep, is the
first majora component of the system. Its
purpose is to even out the flows between
'the peak and slow periods of the day.,This ,
tank is open.
The primary settling tank, measuring
10 feet by 10 feet by lil feet, evens outs the
flow and settles out the solids' permitting
a smaller treatment unit. This is also an
open tank.
Any of the three preceeding Units are
optional.
The actual.treatment unit is a rotating
biological contactor which is comprised of
a cylindrical tank',., partially subni,ersed in
a concrete basin. There will be at least
two of these contactors with a total area of
16,feet by 22 feet. This tinit willbe closed
in. The main treatment takes place
biologically in this unit arid solids are
created.
The . final' settling tank is open and
measures 10 feet by 10 feet by 10 feet and
works with the treatment unit to catch the
solids.
The dosing chamber is an open
concrete tank, measuring 12 Meet by 12
feet by 10 feet, which collects the sewage
after it is treated, allowing large aniounts
to be sent to the tile bed system at one
tiine, instead of permitting it 'to trickle
into the tile bed from the treatment
facility. In addition to the main treatment
process, ° sludge is sent to the aerated
holding tank where it is treated ° and
stored until it 'is hauled away by truck
from the site. This open tank measures 15
feet by 15 feet by 10 feet.
If phosphorous is detected in' testing
the leachate from the tile bed system, a
chemical storage tank, measuring 10 feet
by 10 feet •by 12 feet, is builtinto the
•sytemfor the addition of alum to the
treatment unit and the final settling tank,
to remove phosphorous front the sewage
before it !enters the tile bed system.
than_ a hydro - transformer station. If'
someone chooses to ignore the warning
and climb the fence, they are at their' own
peril , once- inside the fence: .
Burns also informed.the ..November 22
meeting that sludge fom the treatment
facility. will be hauled /away from the site
between 10 and 30 times a year depending
on the size 'of ' the truck used. Lucknow
Village Council, in their discussions at
' council meetings, indicated they believed
sludge would be hauled away three or four
times a year.
Burns addressed reasons for concern by
area residents. Sources of 'odour could
originate from organic 'overload where the
strength of the sewage is greater than the
capacity of the treatment unit. Burns told
the meeting this virtually' never happens in.
purely domestic sewage and as there are
no industries on the sewage service, he
cannot foresee this problem with the
Lucknow ..facility.
Mechanical failure could result in odour
problems, said Burns, but the systends a
gravity. flow situation and no sewage will
.reach the land surface or flow to the river
during a power' failure.
Maintenance is important to the mech-
anical function of the system and Burns
emphasized that the design of the facility
using open tanks, makes it easy to main-
tain and . mechanical failure should not
present a problem.
The only noise associated with` the
facility would be the blower in a small
building which pumps the air Supply to the
equalization andtorage tanks. The, only
other noise: would be the truck hauling
away the sludge, which would be done over
two day periods between 10 and 30 times a
year. •
Burns said the facility is considered
acceptable within 100 metres of residential
buildings and he is confident, but would
not guarantee, there will never be odour.
He said he does not anticipate a problem as
the facilityproposed for Lucknow is very
small. .
fora meeting, we didn't get it. We weren't
invited to a meeting until such time as the
petitions were sent around. If Wawanosh
had acted, there could have been some of • ..
this straightened out before it ever got this
far. �.
We had the ministry of environment on.
one side saying you have to get to work,
and we did what we did to solve some of
the problems. Consequently it has made
some new ones and maybe 'it was a lack of
communication.
Bruce Baynard, West Wawanosh count
calor: What does West Wawanosh gain? If
this is such a good deal, why wouldn't the
town hang on to it?
Brophy: If there is such a thing as an
advantage, the town becomes a landowner
in the' township and the tbw, nship collects
taxes from the town.
Raynard' If we could . make a deal with 1
Milne, would the village be interested in
taking the property off our hands?
Murray: I will go on the record as saying
we would definitely have to take 'a look at
it, but if you can deal with him, because, I ,
spent a whole week trying to get him to
deal and I sure didn't want to walk away
from the $10,000 we put down a hole up
there. ;
Raynsrd: Why did it take Lucknow
council so long to propose a meeting 'with
the West Wawanosh council to discuss this
matter? You took the option, in the spring •
and yet you did not consider asking us for a
meeting until October.
Murray: We looked at the property in
March or April. In the meantime, they did
the testing on the Finnigan eight'acres and
we talked to Snobelen "about his eight
acres. This got, into the summer and it was
after the crop was off before test holes.
were dug. We were informed by Burns,
Ross that it ' was okay to proceed. From
there on I don't know.
Res idents cornp lain
about sewage.
pro biems
Two Lucknow residents, who attended
an information meeting dialing with ques-
tions about a proposed, sewage treatment
facility for the village of Lucknow, 'raised
concerns about : the effluent in the east
tributary of the ' Lucknow River.
Bob .Lyonsasked the Ministry of Envir-
onment officials • at the meeting whether
they had ever tested the east tributary of
the. Lucknow River, which he called Black •
Creek, for sewage pollution.: The• tributary
runs alongside Treleaven's Feed. Mill from
the Mill Pond.
Lyons said Black Creek is half the size of
the Lucknow . River and he bets there is
more effluent being pumped 'into it than
the Lucknow River.
Bill Hutchison, an environmental engin-
eering officer with the ministry' answered •
Lyons questioln, saying as far as he is.
aware the proposedcollector system of the
Lucknow sewage works takes care of any
known problems. The proposed sewage
works services the downtown core only:
Lucknow resident Dorothy ,Atkinson said
her lot is presently being used' as a
dumping basin from Havelock Street to the
Black Creek. She'lives on Campbell Street
just west of Treleaven's Mill.
Atkinson said she made a complaint to
the Bruce County Public, Health Unit and
samples she submitted were supposed, to
be tested in a laboratory. She said she has
never received a lab report or a response
from the health unit concerning her
complaint. '
West Wawanosh Township and Lucknow
residents,"'who livein the area of the
prred sewage treatment facility and tile
b d system, are concerned it Will become
necessary to expand the system in the ,
future as more of the village is serviced by
sewers. The residents fear they will be
living near a much larger facility than the
facility currently , proposed, which the
ministry describes as very small.
oi