The Citizen, 1992-07-01, Page 5Arthur Black
Being a job
gypsy gives
you plenty
to talk about
One of the luxuries of being middle-
aged or older is that you can look back on all
the jobs you've held.
And to glory in the knowledge that
you don’t have to do them any more.
Back in the Bad Old Days there were
jobs galore. The pay was usually lousy, the
working conditions ran the gamut from
dreary to downright dangerous, and the boss
as often as not was a jerk.
But that was okay. You took the job
for as long as you needed it, then one fine
day you told your esteemed employer to
pound Sifto, and off you went to find
another job.
I counted them up once and
discovered I had 27 different kinds of jobs
before I finally manacled myself to a
typewriter for life. I tried everything from
door-to-door encyclopedia flogging to
swabbing the deck of a Liberian oil tanker.
Being a job gypsy doesn’t make you
rich, but it does give you plenty to talk
about.
ilnternational Scene
■SISk TO
By Raymond Canon
Lower dollar
could relieve
cross-border
shopping sting
In case you haven't been noticing
lately, the Canadian dollar has been falling
on world money markets so that it is about
60 lower in terms of the American dollar
than it was only a few months ago. It is not
difficult to see what this does to us as a
nation; our exports become cheaper and it is
also a cheaper country for foreign tourists to
visit, all of which are to the good. On the
other hand, and this is certainly not all that
bad, imported goods are more expensive and
it also costs more to shop in the United
States. In other words some of the sting
should be going out of cross-border
shopping. However, as long as the
difference in the price of gasoline in the two
countries is as great as it is right now, I have
the feeling that there will be a goodly
number of people close to the border slip
over to fill up their lank.
You won't believe this, of course, but I
have some American relatives not too far
away from the border (Erie, Pa, to be exact).
They are delighted when I bring them things
from Canada that, are you ready?, cost less
and are of higher quality than the
comparable goods in the U.S. It has always
been this way but, with all the publicity that
cross-border shopping has been receiving,
\
The other day I was in a bar, jawing
with another Jackrabbit of All Trades. We
wound up comparing our work wounds —
softest Jobs. Best Paying Jobs. Jobs We'd
Like to Have Again.
And All Time Worst jobs.
"Roofing" I told him. "Tar and gravel.
Started at five in the morning and worked
until at least three guys fainted from the heat
or the fumes. Put a thermometer on the roof
one day and the mercury shot right off the
scale in less than a minute. Still got scars on
my arms from the hot pitch. Get thirsty just
thinking about that job" I said. "How about
you?"
He was a battered-looking guy with
big callous-hardened mitts and twitchy eyes
that looked like they were sitting on a lot of
secrets. I figured he’s come back with a
story about digging for emeralds in the
jungles of Brazil or rearranging kneecaps in
the jungles of New Jersey.
His big fist trembled as he reached for
the draft glass and his voice dropped to a
husky mutter.
"Personnel recruiter" he croaked.
"Toughest job I ever had."
Turned out he'd spent two and a half
years screening recruits for a large Toronto
corporation. "Before that I’d worked the oil
fields in Alberta, tugboats in the Georgia
Strait and a spell of hardrock mining in
Manitouwadge — but the only job that ever
gave me an ulcer was a desk job on Bay
Street."
I thought he was pulling my leg, but
such situations have been overlooked. Pity!
However, we must resist the urge to
think that, now that the dollar is lower, all
we have to do is sit back and enjoy the
benefits. As far as I am concerned, the
dollar could drop about another 40 U.S. to
reach what is called Purchasing Power
Parity. This is the situation which exists
when $1,000 Canadian dollars will buy
about the same basket of goods which its
American equivalent would in the U.S.
When it gets to about 78-790, then we can
start to sit back, but only if we do a couple
of important things.
Number one is in the field of tourism.
When our dollar drops in value, as I have
indicated above, Canada becomes cheaper
for foreigners to visit. When they come, you
will (this is an order) treat them as honoured
guests to the extent of making them think
that a visit to Canada was the greatest thing
that could have happened to them. Guess
what they will do when they get back home?
Tell others, of course.
I recently had to host a delegation of
Swiss businessmen and their wives, few of
which could speak any English. Switzerland
is noted for its treatment of tourists but I was
determined to outswiss the Swiss.
Everything went off like (Swiss?)
clockwork. Their entire time was organized
but flexible and even the weather co
operated. Our visitors were delighted at
their reception and went home thinking that
things were great here after all. That is
precisely the point I was trying to make.
Business, too, have to get their act
together. A low exchange rate will do only
so much for you; the rest has to be great
quality and service. It has been interesting
maybe not. I'm beginning to think that
interviewing prospective employees may be
one of the toughest gigs a guy can draw.
I have in front of me a list compiled
from a survey conducted by the International
Association of Corporate and Professiona.l
Recruiters. The Association asked its 600
members to list some of the more "unusual
questions" they'd been asked by people
looking for a job.
Here's a few of the choice ones:
"Why am I here?"
"Why aren't you in a more interesting
business?"
"What are the zodiac signs of all the
board members and their wives?"
"What is it that you people do at this
company?"
"Would it be a problem if I'm angry
most of the time?"
"Does the company have a policy
regarding whether employees can carry
guns?"
"Will the company pay for moving my
two-ton rock garden from California to
Maryland?"
And my favourite: "I know this is off
the subject, but will you marry me?"
Puts a whole new perspective on that
beady-eyed guy sitting on the other side of
the Personnel Desk, doesn't it?
Yessir . . . I've been a roofer, a sailor,
a cattle prodder and a bartender, but I’ve
never been a Personnel Recruiter and I'm
glad of it.
I don't think I'm tough enough.
to note that some Canadian companies,
which had moved to either the United States
or Mexico, are discovering that they don't
have to go elsewhere to provide this to their
foreign customers; they can do this better at
home. Let me cite one example. In 1988
Fleck Manufacturing, of Huron Park, came
in for a goodly share of opprobrium for
shutting up its plant at the former Centralia
air base and moving everything to Mexico.
What is not nearly as well known is that it
shortly after moved one of its plants from
Mexico to Canada (Tillsonburg to be
precise) and is able to give its customers
better quality and faster service. This is not
an isolated example, by the way.
We do, however, have to be nimble on
our feet to keep up with all the competition
but isn't that what our system is all about?
Customers' tastes change elsewhere just as
they do here and we have to react to that. It
pleases me no end to read about a small
Canadian company, and there are plenty in
all provinces, who are able to tum out a
quality product and sell it to foreign
customers. I have recently come back from
a business trip to the Atlantic Provinces;
while I was there, I ran across a small
company in Prince Edward Island which was
bringing in fish and smoking it in such a way
that it had attracted favourable attention
from such large customers as Delta Airlines
in Atlanta, Ga. The owner was not resting
on his laurels; he reported that his American
competition was trying to get this customer
back; so far he had kept ahead of the game.
It always delights me to come across
such successes if only to offset all the doom
and gloom that permeates our thinking in
this country. It's a never-ending battle!
I Mt CITIZEN, WEDNESDAY, JULY 1 ,1992. PAGE 5.
TheShort
of it
By Bonnie Gropp
From 67 to 92,
not a change
for the better
Today is Canada's quasicentennial, which
I will probably remember better than its last
milestone.
I was a Grade eight student in Listowel
when Canada celebrated its centennial in
1967, (That made me 13 for anyone, trying
to figure it out) so don’t have many vivid
memories of what was happening. I
remember the Expo '67 trailer coming to the
park and our class getting lime out from
school to go visit it. I remember some
students getting excited about going to the
exhibition in Montreal, but as I was not one
of them, that momentous occurrence was
shrugged off my shoulders with the
flippancy that comes from being too young
to care about something you weren't part of.
What I remember more about that year is
the way things seemed to me. Life in 1967
was, to me, easier. Perhaps it’s selective
memory, but even with the racial tensions
that existed, the ever growing feminist
movement and hostilities over the Viet Nam
war heating, 1967 seemed a pretty
remarkable time to live - for a child anyway.
Life in 1992 has, quite simply, become
loo complicated, even for the young. We
must teach them to love thy neighbour, but
remember that even a friend can be a
stranger. Whereas the 60's were a time of
love and peace, we are now in a time when it
is virtually unsafe for women to walk alone
or for anyone to come to the aid of a
stranger.
We can't protect ourselves or our children
too much. As a youngster I and my friends
had free rein. Today, trying to keep a
watchful eye over our exuberant children is a
full-time job. And even that isn't enough,
when you think of a recent incident where a
mother had to literally fight off an alleged
abductor.
And nowhere is it more important for
people to learn, than in our multi-cultural
nation, that all are created equal. Yet all the
while it appears we must come to terms with
a reverse rascism in our society that is
ludicrous. If we truly want to leam to get
along together it should not be at the
expense of white, Anglo males.
Discrimination was, and is, wrong. But so
is overcompensation. In Waterloo Region
white males will apparently need a mark 10
percent higher than women or minorities on
the qualifying test for the fire department.
What ever happened to the best person
for the job? Someone recently told me about
an application form they filled out. Their
qualifications were not important, just race,
gender, etc.
Some police detachments no longer have
strictly black silhouettes for their target
practises; they use white during the day and
black at night. This is a harmless change,
that perhaps demonstrates sensitivity,
however, why did it have to be? Silhouettes,
represent shadows, which are dark
regardless of race. I can't help wondering -
would the question of possible sensitivity
have come up if they had been using white
to begin with?
I wish, in the future, when I think back to
Canada's 125th birthday it would be with the
same good feeling I have when I remember
the time of the centennial celebration. Still
, an idealist, I believe that the majority of
people in this country are fair and just and
all want the same things for each other. I still
believe that this is the best place in the world
to be and I'd like to believe that when my
children grow up it still will be.
If there is as much change in the next 25
years ihere won't be much to celebrate.