HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Citizen, 1991-10-16, Page 17THE CITIZEN, WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 16 1991. PAGE 17.
Speaking
of Farming
By Jim Fitzgerald
Make cropping pay
Feds kick in $800 million
to help farmers in crisis
Most of you are likely familiar with the so-called Chinese water torture
test. That's where a person is tied up, and water is dripped one small drop
at a time on their forehead with precise regularity. Waiting for each drip
becomes so excruciating, that the victims willingly confess to any
impropriety. Each drop, you see, is by itself completely harmless, it's the
accumulation that hurts you. When I ran my own small business full time,
we called it being "nickeled and dimed to death". We never lost money on
major items, but it was all those little things that went wrong that seemed
to eat into the profits
The latest farm crisis for Canadian producers of grains and oil seeds
over the last eight or nine years is something akin to thaCwater torture. The
prices inch down in small increments — nickels and dimes — until we
have reached the point where farm incomes in those sectors are falling far
below expenses needed to grow the crop, leaving little for living costs, let
alone a return on labour and investment. The federal and provincial
governments have come through with last minute emergency assistance
packages of about $850 million. Farm groups, trying not to appear as if
they are looking a gift horse in the mouth, are grudgingly saying thanks
and quietly pointing out that it's not enough. And they're right. The new
money will only stop the haemorrhaging temporarily, but won't keep many
in business. Even the new jointly funded government-producer programs,
set to kick in next year, are far from adequate. The new GRIP program will
only cover farmers' prices to the 1985 level, while expenses have risen to
1992 levels. How many of us would put up with living on 1985 incomes?
So, what is the answer? Canadians, especially those from the Prairie
provinces, have been told for generations that we were the bread basket of
the world with three out of every four bushels of wheat grown sold on the
export market. In the last decade, this has been reinforced by reports that
the world population, now over five billion persons, is exploding by some
90 million souls a year, with many of them dying of starvation. But do
those people want our wheat, com, and soy beans? Are they even part of
their diet? With incomes far below ours, can they afford to pay enough to
keep our farmers in business?
Douglas Mutch, director of economic research for the Livestock Feed
Board, a Crown corporation, addresses the first presumption we hold dear:
is there a world food shortage? Writing in the latest edition of the Board's
Grain Facts ,Mutch contends that the global food demand has not
increased as much as was projected in the mid 1970s, while food supplies
have exceeded expectations, because of factors such as increased yields
better technology, mechanization, and increased feeding efficiencies. He
points out that while global grain acreage in 1990 was the same as 1967,
output has increased 70 per cent, while meat output is up 120 per cent.
Continued advances in biotechnology and techhological transfers will
mean grain yields will continue to increase in the foreseeable future,
Mutch contends, and that will result in continued excess grain production
capacity for years to come.
As well, most importing countries are striving for national self
sufficiency. Mutch says that with a few exceptions, only those countries
with a significant trade surplus of non-agricultural products can afford to
be a net importer of food. To which I might add, look out for all those
former communist countries, whose farmers, once they get their act
together, will be able to flood the market with cheap grain.
All these questions are in need of answers, and about the only good
thing to come out of the farm crisis, is that we may get them answered
once and for all. That will lead to some solutions to truly address the
problem. It’s obvious that the Canadian government, carrying a huge
deficit from subsidizing other sectors of the economy, doesn't have pockets
deep enough to subsidize grain growing for the export market at a level
high enough to keep farmers in business. Although the public is
sympathetic, farmers are so few in number that the latest interest the media
has in the farmer's plight will soon end, and they'll move on to other
stories. So it's up to farmers to sit down and put their own house in order.
The same chaos faced the dairy and poultry sectors 25 years ago.
Plagued by low prices, high debt loads, bankruptcies, and despair, farmers
decided to end the lunacy and match domestic supply with domestic
demand. Maybe it's time that grain, pork and beef farmers did the same
thing, and quit deluding themselves that they can be "world competitive"
and make a decent living al the same time.
After nearly two months of inten
sive lobbying, demonstrations, and
desperate pleading, Canadian grain
and oil seed farmers will finally
receive an $800 million relief pack
age from the Federal government.
While farmers agreed the new
money will help, Federal agricul
ture minister Bill McKnight's
announcement last Thursday won't
go very far to address the depressed
prices for wheat, spring grains,
com and soy beans, which were at
15 year lows.
The “Line in the Dirt” grass roots
farm movement, which was started
by farmers in the Lucknow area, is
still concerned that Ontario farmers
get their fair share of the new
money, and had planned a demon
stration and meeting in Dresden on
Tuesday night.
So far, there haven't been any
indications of how or when the
money will be paid out, and all
McKnight would say was that it
would be “before seeding next
spring.” And that has many farmers
and farm leaders concerned that the
money won't be enough and won't
come in time to save thousands of
Canadian farmers who are on the
edge of bankruptcy.
McKnight said that of the new
money, $700 million will go to
grain farmers, and $100 million
will go to producers of horticultural
crops. Canadian grain farmers have
been caught in the crossfire of an
international grain trading war
between the United States and the
European Common Market.
A feel forjudging
A judge gets in touch with a lamb at the Huron-Bruce 4H
lamb and calf sale at Brussels Livestock Saturday. 4H
club members from across the two counties showed their
projects inthe morning, then had them sold in an afternoon
auction.
Jack Riddell wins award
for ag. contributions
A former member of the Ontario
Legislature and minister of agricul
ture and food, Jack Riddell, was
chosen to receive the Huron Coun
ty Award from the Huron Federa
tion of Agriculture at their annual
meeting Friday night.
Mr. Riddell, who served as MPP
from 1973 to 1990, was minister of
agriculture from 1985 to 1989. He
was taken by surprise when the
announcement was made by
regional director Bob Down of
Usbome township. He called Mr.
Riddell a person who grew up with
agriculture along side his dad
Keith, who was a long-time agri
cultural representative for Middle
sex County. "Jack was an ag rep
and farmer as well, and was also
concerned about the plight of the
industry throughout his 17 year
political career," Down said.
Ip other business, Brenda McIn
tosh of Tuckersmith township was
re-elected to her second term as
president of the Federation, while
Bill Wallace of Tuckersmith is the
new first vice president and Nathan
Peel of Tumberry is the new sec
ond vice president. The six direc
tors at large are Tom Hayter,
Stephen Township; Gerald Johns,
Fred Hem and Merlon Brock from
Usbome; Jody Durand, Hay; and
Ken Scott, McKillop.
Stephen Thompson of Blyth was
reconfirmed as the auditor, and
fieldman Blaine Stephenson gave a
rundown of the past year, which
was an extremely busy one for the
Federation.
One resolution was approved and
will be forwarded to the Ontario
Federation for approval at the
provincial level. It wants all farm
ers to boycott this year's Ontario
Ministry of Agriculture and Food
Outlook Conference in November.
Members felt this year's annual
conference is putting too much
emphasis on organic farming and
environmental concerns, without
discussing what area farmers are
more worried about this year: the
farm financial crisis, and manage
ment and marketing techniques.
Guest speaker John Core, chair
man of the Ontario Milk Marketing
Board, warned the 150 producers
that a deal is about to be struck at
the General Agreement on Tariffs
and Trade (GATT) talks in Brus
sels, Belgium, and Article 11, a
special clause to protect supply
management may be traded away
by Canadian negotiators. That spe
cial clause protects Canadian dairy
and poultry farmers from unfair
outside competition, while match
ing domestic supply to demand
under marketing boards.
He also said that the current cri
sis in the grains and oil seeds sector
is the same chaos that faced the
dairy and poultry sector before they
became organized under marketing
board 25 years ago.
“Maybe it's time we worked
together to make those sectors that
are hurting return a fair return to
producers as well,” Core said.
CHECK US OUT
or special cash rebate, financing available Our ATC's start $3,669
Dairy, poultry
farmers worry
about GATT
BY JIM FITZGERALD
As if things weren't tough
enough for some sectors of the
agricultural production, now other
sectors are worried about their
future as well.
While producers of grains and
oilseeds are being hit by low prices
for their crops because of an inter
national grain trading war, dairy
and poultry farmers are now
becoming worried about their
future as well.
More than 500 of those dairy and
poultry farmers decided to go on a
province-wide lobbying effort to
protect their industry, following a
meeting recently in Mississauga.
It's all because of the negotiations
taking place in Brussels, Belgium
on the General Agreement on Tar
iffs and Trade (GATT). Canadian
farmers are worried that they may
lose their ability to control the
domestic supply and price of dairy
and poultry products when a new
trade deal is negotiated this fall
between the 101 countries in the
GATT.
Dairy and poultry farmers cur
rently are able to set prices for their
products and control the supply to
match the demand within Canada,
based on a cost of production. That
has given those farmers 25 years of
stability, and they’re fearful that if
that protection is removed under a
section of the GATT rules called
"Article XI," then those farmers say
the country would be flooded with
cheaper, subsidized American
products. The subsequent potential
loss of the $3 billion in farm gate
revenue would wreak havoc in
rural areas and force many farmers
out of business, farm groups say.
During October, producer repre
sentatives will meet with all federal
Members of Parliament from
Ontario, and are asking all produc
ers to write to selected federal min
isters.
The joint lobby effort by the
Ontario supply management boards
includes the Ontario Cream Pro
ducers Marketing Board, the
Ontario Milk Marketing Board, the
Ontario Chicken Producers Market
ing Board, the Broiler Hatching
Egg and Chick Commission, the
Ontario Turkey Producers Market-
Continued on page 23
Kawasak