HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Citizen, 1991-06-05, Page 5Arthur Black
Sir Wilfrid
laid it on
a little thick
Sir Wilfrid Laurier uttered that smug
prediction, back at the turn of the last
century. Sir Wilfrid was a tad premature.
Here in the dying embers of the time period
in question, one might argue that the
twentieth century belonged to America,
Russia, Europe, Japan — maybe even Korea,
but not to the Great White North. The past
91 years lavished many blessings and
rewards upon Canucks, but not, I think,
custodianship of the century.
Pity. Would have been so tidy, being able
to tag a hundred years of turmoil as "The
Canadian Century". Historians like to
catalogue periods of time that way. Thus we
have the Pleistocene epoch, the Edwardian
Era and the Iron Age. Journalists are fond of
subdividing it even further into decades --
the Roaring Twenties; the Dirty Thirties, the
Swinging Sixties, the "Me" Decade of the
80s.
I have no idea how the Nineties will go
down in the history books, but I have a
modest suggestion for the year we're in —
1991.
Is war
outdated?
BY RAYMOND CANON
"O wretched sons of men! Why do ye get
you weapons and bring slaughter on one
another? Cease therefrom, give o'er your
toiling, and in mutual peace keep safe your
cities. Short is the span of life ..."
It isn't too often that I begin a column with
a quote but this, I hope, is not just any
column. I doubt very much that there are
many readers who will be able to place this
quote. However, other than its rather archaic
language, it is something that easily could
have been said in 1991 as a result of the
short but vicious and devastating war in the
Middle East. This is a translation and it
comes not from some modem foreign writer
but from "The Suppliants," written in 410
B.C. by that most famous of Greek
dramatists, Euripides.
My first observation, and Presume yours,
might well be that things haven't changed
too much in the past 2500 years or so. Even
back in pre-biblical times there were
influcncial people who deplored the use of
war to find a solution to problems. What
Euripides said has been repeated many times
since and, in one way or another, has been
said during the past year. Where, therefore,
do we stand in our attitudes toward war?
If Euripides shares the same attitude about
war as do many people of this century, I
think it is safe to say that mankind really
hasn't changed loo much over the past 2500
years in his approach to solving national and
international problems. My knowledge of
history tells me that countries have gone on
century after dreary century killing each
other in droves in order to solve a problem
that diplomacy and the like have failed to
resolve. That being the case, the rather naive
approach that some people took in thinking
that war could be avoided in the Middle East
is as unrealistic now as it was before the
time of Christ. I have regretfully come to the
conclusion that, until we change human
How about The Year of the Veggie?
These are volatile times for vegetables.
Take the potato. Take, in fact, the only
province in the Dominion that is known
around the world for its potatoes — P.E.I.
They don't call it Spud Island for nothing.
It's received scant attention in the press,
but the fact is, your average Prince Edward
islander now faces criminal charges if he or
she dares to grow potatoes in his vegetable
garden.
I am not making this up. The provincial
government is trying to stomp out a virus —
called PVYN -- which likes to cohabit with
potato plants. To that end, the government
has created a brand new law enforcement
agency called The Prince Edward Island
Potato Police. Officers of the PEIPP come
armed with court orders, search warrants and
bulldozers to plough under bootleg potato
patches. Lawbreakers who flout the will of
the Legislature and attempt to cultivate
home grown french fries face a fine of up to
$25,000.
I swear I'm not making this up.
What makes this story exceptionally loony
is the fact that PVYN virus is utterly
harmless to humans and potatoes. Officials
want to stomp out the virus because it is
lethal to tobacco plants.
Which of course, kill Canadians by the
tens of thousands every year.
Would that the tubers of P.E. I. had a
nature far more than we have so far, we are
going to have to accept the fact that wars are
going to take place.
In short, somewhere down the line there
will be another Hitler, another Saddam
Hussein, who will be convinced that his
goals can be reached only by the use of
military force and that, as long as nobody
stands up to him, he can pretty well do what
he pleases.
This does not mean for one instant that we
should thereby assume that war is inevitable
and that we can't do anything about it. War
may not be inevitable on is planet of fallible
humans but there is a great deal that can be
done to cut down on the number of wars that
actually happen.
My first job of any significance was as an
instructor with NATO. This military alliance
of western European national plus Canada
and the United States is, I am convinced, all
that has stood between us and a Russian
invasion since the late 1940's. Those of you
who have been around for a while will
remember that the Cold War got really frigid
from time to time and, had we not been in a
state of preparedness, the Soviet tanks would
have come crashing across the border
between East and West Germany. Keep in
mind that Switzerland has one of the largest
armies in Europe and when is the last time
they had to fight? It was back in Napoleon's
time!
Another step is the development of such
concepts as the United Nations. What this
So much for saving money
THE EDITOR,
How ironic, Mike Harris and his Tories
who claim to want to save Tax dollars, have
tied up the Ontario Legislature for a month
with points of order and other silly activities.
That means tax paid members and their
staff silting around unable to get on with the
business of Government.
How much do the Tories figure this
juvenile attention getting waste of lime costs
champion like Steven Acquafresca of
Colorado. Earlier this year Mister
Acquafresca quarterbacked a bill through the
Colorado senate that promised to "protect
fruits and vegetables from slander". As an
apple grower, Acquafresca was incensed
over reports that the chemical Alar, sprayed
on apple trees, could cause cancer. Apple
sales plummeted, even though the Alar data
turned out to be inconclusive. Mr.
Acquafresca contended that law abiding
fruits and vegetables should be protected
from such unsubstantiated rumours.
Unhappily for Acquafresca, his bill
amounted to so much applesauce. It was
hooted down by Colorado legislators who
complained that it would "prune the
Constitution of the right of free speech" and
"treat a lima like a human bean".
That's the trouble with being a fruit or
vegetable — no respect.
Although now that I think of it, the PEI
spud does have one Good Will Ambassador.
This fella even wrote a song about them.
One verse goes:
It's Bud the Spud, from the big red mud,
Rollin' down the highway smilin'
The spuds are big, on the back of Bud's
ng,
They're from Prince Edward Island.
That Stompin' Tom — he sure knows his
onions.
means is that we have to give up a bit of our
national sovereignty and avoid conditions
that can lead to war. One of our most
meaningful contributions to the U.N. has
been peace-keeping forces that we have sent
off to hot spots; there are very few soldiers
in the Canadian army that have not done
some duty of this nature during his or her
military career.
Yet another step is to cut down on
economic inequalities. Marx may have been
wrong when he said that all wars had
economic causes but there is no doubt that
he was partially right. The more effort we
make collectively to remove these causes,
the fewer chances there will be for war to
break out.
Finally we have to attempt to change
human nature a bit. Take a look at wars and
you will see in them a number of our less
desirable characteristics. A certain amount
of what we know as human aggression will
always be with us but somehow we have to
learn how and when to curb it.
I can close with something positive. We
may still have wars but we may have learned
a substantial amount about avoiding world
wars. In the period 1914-45 we had no less
than two colossal ones with millions of
people needlessly slaughtered in both of
them. Although we have come close on a
couple of occasions, we have managed to
avoid such a calamity since then. That in
itself should make the sentiments expressed
on Nov. 11 rise above the trite and mundane.
the Taxpayers of Ontario.
It's no wonder Canadians are cynical about
politicians.
Gel on with business. There are important
issues to be dealt with.
OS COLE ARNAL
WALTON, ONTARIO.
More letters on page 12
THE CITIZEN, WEDNESDAY, JUNE 5,1991. PAGE 5.
Letter
from the
editor
Summer
delights now
lost forever
With the great weather on the
weekend I fell the urge, Saturday night, to
pack up the family and go to the drive in
movie...except there aren't any drive-ins left
within driving range.
Maybe it's just nostalgia for my youth
but I miss the drive-in. I find it hard to
believe that something that was such an
integral part of our lives such a short while
ago is now virtually extinct. There's a drive-
in in Hanover now but that's about it locally.
Once there were drive-ins all over the place:
Clinton, Goderich, Grand Bend, Harriston,
Kincardine. You were never far from a
chance to sit in your car and watch a movie.
The drive-in, when I was in high
school had a kind of aura about it that made
it exciting. There was, of course, a sort of
illicit excitement about it, sort of like
sneaking into the poolroom when you were
younger. There was the reputation of the
place. I mean everybody knew what went on
there...usually even knew who was with
whom when it supposedly went on. I mean,
nobody went there to see the movie, right? If
there was as much hanky-panky really went
on as the rumours in the high school halls
said, then it's a wonder the current teenage
population isn't larger than it is.
For all that kind of reputation,
however, most of us went to the drive-in
with others of our own sex, at least partly
fantasizing that we might meet somebody
there of the opposite sex. The drive-in was
one of those place you went (like the beach)
because you heard about other people who
met girls there, or you saw all those teenage
movies where people met girls there and you
figured that one of these days it had to be
your turn. Maybe if you were blond and
bronzed and well-muscled and had a hot car
it did but if you were tall and skinny and
freckled and drove you dad’s old car it didn’t
happen -1 speak from experience.
It didn't work when I had my own first
car either - a car of even more ancient
vintage than my fathers. As a matter of fact
it was after a night at the drive in that I lost
my first car. We were proceeding home
down a county highway in the black of night
when we met a horse coming in the opposite
direction. Neither car or horse survived the
meeting.
To tell the truth, though, I think I have
more fond memories about taking our
younger family to the drive-in than I do of
my teenage years. There was something nice
and private about it all. You didn't have to
worry if the kids made too much noise. You
could carry on a conversation and nobody
was disturbed but each other. You could
have a special night out with the kids and yet
sort of be at home al the same time.
Now, I guess, we get the same kind of
experience by slaying al home with a rental
movie in the VCR. Sort of. While I love
having a wealth of movies available from the
rental store, it still isn't quite the same as
going out for the evening.
Sure seeing a movie in the drive-in
wasn't for connoisseur, what with bad sound
and usually a screen that left lines or bumps
or dots in the middle of the picture, but it
was a special occasion. The trouble is, I
guess, it wasn't special enough for enough of
us often enough. I'm afraid if we're not
careful, we may soon face the same problem
with indoor movie theatres then we won't
have any choice but slaying home with the
VCR.