Loading...
The Rural Voice, 1988-09, Page 101(ALmnR) GRAIn SYSTEMS LTD Quality Grain Storage Drying & Handling Products DESIGN • SALES • SERVICE Expert Erection Crews Available CALL NOW (RLmAR) GRAIL SYSTEMS LTD. P.O. Box 550, Exeter, Ont. 519-235-1919 or call Brad Marsden, evenings 519-235-2018 MILTON J. DIETZ LIMITED RR 4, SEAFORTH, NOK 1 WO 519-527-0608 MAXIMIZE PROFITS in LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY with VENTILATION IMPROVEMENT • We supply several brands of Exhaust Fans. Air Bag Mfzing fans. Powered Louvres for intakes. • We also stock a cornplete line o1 Sprinkler System Components such as Time Clocks, Solenoids, Thermostats, Plastic Pipe and Nozzles to cool and train hogs. 'Wholesale and Retair FREE ESTIMATES Based on Ministry of Agriculture & Food Specifications • Reg I M — Rolston Punno Company Rolston Purina Canada Inc — Regnstere0 Use! 24 THE RURAL VOICE If there is to be an agricultural policy in this province it must be to make agriculture viable. The province is trying to suck and blow at the same time." There is no doubt that government policy concerning land use is in a state of flux. Federal agriculture minister John Wise has said that his department has considered proposals that would encourage farmers across the country to abandon marginal land. But accor- ding to the Canadian constitution, land -use planning falls under provin- cial jurisdiction. British Columbia has its Agricul- tural Land Commission. Saskatchew- an has the Farm Ownership Act and the Land Bank Act. Quebec's Bill 90 protects that province's farm land, and in Prince Edward Island strict legis- lation guards the small but fertile land base. In Ontario, where there has been little consistency in the application of the Foodland Guidelines, farmers and developers are looking for a definitive statement on land -use policy. A string of challenges to the guidelines might just force such a statement. One expected witness at the Wat-Cha hearings is Harold Fleming of the Foodland Preservation Branch of OMAF. Fleming has been with the branch (originally called Foodland Development) since 1977. Further to the introduction of the guidelines in 1978, Fleming's department compiled the "Foodland Preservation Policy Statement" of 1983. But this paper retains the status of a "proposed document" and is now being revised and reviewed — briefs are still being accepted for discussion. The impetus for the renewal of the paper comes from the 1983 Planning Act. Policy statements from all mini- stries have been requested in relation to the act's jurisdiction. The process, like an OMB hearing, is both time- consuming and costly. And on either side of any land -use dispute there are those who find our system frustrating. Yet such frustra- tions are inevitable in a system de- signed to allow each interested party its day in court. The OMB, before dispensing its discretionary justice, is obliged to open the floor to statements from members of the public. In Ayton, 23 individuals spoke to the board. A high-school student supported the development. A minister opposed it. Charles Watson's neighbours favoured it. An emigrant from Mississauga feared it. At the end of the summer portion of the hearing, the tally read 17 for and 6 against. But the board has yet to hear from Elbert van Donkersgoed and his clients. He is not a lawyer, but his status in the hearing room is similar. Charles Watson may have the means to develop an industrial park on his land. And he may have the full sup- port of local planners and politicians and businessmen. And yet a devel- oper in the 1980s must also be ready to contend with determined citizens groups concerned with defending what is increasingly being recognized as our shared environment ("environment" being a term applied to social and economic aspects as well as the physical). Elbert van Donkersgoed is both research and policy director of the Christian Farmers Federation of Ontario and a director of Friends of Foodland. In the early 1970s, with Ontario experiencing a frantic devel- opment boom, citizens groups inter- ested in environmental protection sprang up in response to many scattered issues. The Association of Peel People Evaluating Agricultural Land (APPEAL), Preservation of Agricultural Lands Society (PALS), People or Planes (POP), and Save the Rouge Valley System (SRVS) are all co-ordinated under the Friends of Foodland banner. In Grey -Bruce, the Citizens for the Protection of the Environment and Foodland (CPEF) have joined the Friends of Foodland coalition and will draw on its experience and resources to fight the Wat-Cha proposal. In the introduction to his 1984 Citizens Guide to Foodland Protec- tion, van Donkersgoed asks: "Are you intimidated by pin-striped suits, planning jargon, consultants, zoning by-laws, Official Plans or tribunals?" He goes on to lead the reader through the intricate process of staving off en- croaching urban development. And he points out why the fight is necessary. "During the past 25 years, almost 80 per cent of Ontario's urban r+cvel-