Loading...
The Rural Voice, 1987-08, Page 16Hagedorn HAGEDORN ROUND BALE FORK — Loader mount or three point hitch — Single or double for all types of bales — Rugged & economical. Only $235 F.O.B. Paisley — See us fora full line of Round Bale Forks & Feeders N E. Hagedorn & Sons Ltd. PAISLEY 519-353-5240 Ward & Uptigrove CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS Listowel Mitchell 291-3040 348-8412 R.B. Karcher, C.A. C.W. Brouse, C.A. C.D. Newell, C.A. R.H. Loree, C.A. R.E. Uptigrove, C.A. G.J. Martin, C.A. R.C. Roswell, C.A. 14 THE RURAL VOICE FREE TRADE AND OUR EAST -WEST SPLIT Once again the country seems to be split on an east -west basis as west- ern farm leaders blast the eastern farm groups for worrying over the effect that free trade could have on their livelihoods. Alberta farm groups, representing beef, pork, lamb, and grain producers, accuse farmers in Ontario and Quebec of trying to scuttle the free trade talks to protect supply management boards. "We resent them attempting to protect their (farm) sectors on the backs of ours," according to their statement. Fuelled by long years of being neglected, of feeling that they get the brunt of unjust decisions made far off to the east, westerners now seem to have the attitude that anything that hurts the east must be good for the west. Polis continue to show strong support across the west for free trade negotiations. Westerners have always seen trade barriers as helpful to the east (and in regard to much of history they have been right) while doing little for them except increasing the cost of manufactured equipment that they could buy more cheaply from the U.S. Today there are few trade barriers against U.S. imports and few restric- tions against Canadian farm exports to the U.S. In recent years, there have been cases of unilateral American re- taliation to perceived Canadian advan- tages in trade. Westem beef and pork producers, like their eastern counter- parts, seem mostly concerned not with current problems, but with problems that might develop if protectionist sen- timent continues to flourish in the U.S. They worry about markets for their products if some American politician sees a chance to win farm votes by hitting out at Canadian imports. We seem to be going into the free trade discussions, in farm products at least, to take the unenviable position that we're only seeking the status quo. The Americans, on the other hand, can "bargain" with us by demanding freer access to the markets we protect through "supply management." While the government insists that supply management boards are safe, they could easily be destroyed if borders in those areas were struck down. In other words, if we get what we want in free trade negotiations, west- ern and eastern producers of pork and beef and some grains can only hope to stay about where they are. If the Americans get what they want, the supply -managed producers (in the one area that has shown the kind of stabil- ity that has helped keep our farm com- munities going through some very bad times) could be destroyed. (Given the ideological leanings of many beef, pork, and grain producers, this might be an end in itself in the negotiations.) But even given Canada's limited goal of protecting the markets we do have, the Americans have shown little inclination to give up their power to retaliate unilaterally. The idea of a dispute -settling mechanism has been shot down time and again. The situation is clouded further be- cause of uncertainty over the one ad- vantage Canadian farmers have over U.S. competitors. If our dollar started to rise and got near to being par with the American, how many markets would be left for Canadian farm pro- duce in the U.S.? American farmers already have the benefits of long growing seasons, milder climates, and cheaper labour, livestock housing, and heating and fuel costs. If the dollar were even, which direction would farm trade be flowing? The westerners with their knee- jerk reaction against the east and toward free trade may just be cooking their own goose.0 KEITH ROULSTON, WHO LIVES NEAR BLYTH, IS THE ORIGINATOR AND PAST PUBLISHER OF THE RURAL VOICE.