Loading...
The Rural Voice, 1987-03, Page 22BUILDS EVERYTHING BETTER FOR BARNS Gain control over feed costs and production labour ... ... process your own feed rations and save time and money! BERG HAMMERMILL Combines mixing and grinding into one continuous operation. High capacity output. Case-hardened, bevel -edged grinding hammers result in uniform size of feed particles. All wear - points are replace- able for long life expectancy. Flexible, safe, and automatic. BERG Replace purchased soybean meal with homegrown beans which are high in natural protein content and provide your cows with a good source of by-pass protein. You get faster gains, better feed conversion, and increased production. ROAST-A-TRON Fast! Accurate! Reliable! STABLING & EQUIPMENT Sales, Installation Service Contact: JACK GRAUL R.R. 2, GADSHILL, ONT. 519-595-4530 or IVES CONSTRUCTION R.R. 2, BLYTH, ONT. 519-887-9024 20 THE RURAL VOICE REDUCED TILLAGE AND NUTRIENT LAYERING There's an article in the November issue of Country Guide about how conservation tillage confuses soil - testing technology, but the story raises more questions than it answers. The issue is important and timely, how- ever, since those of you who didn't find time to get your soil sampling done last fall, or didn't have someone do it for you, have only "one kick at the cat" left before the crop goes in this spring. Stratification of P and K either on or below the soil surface in conserva- tion tillage has certainly raised major questions about the effects on growing crops and about techniques needed for the collection of soil samples. Because of the changing chemical characteristics of the surface three inches of soil in conservation tillage, soil -sampling techniques must undergo change. But, most importantly, the interpretation of the laboratory results and the final recommendation must undergo the biggest change. We do know that repeated broadcast applications of fertilizer P and K result in higher concentrations of these nutrients close to the soil surface and that amounts of P and K adequate for optimum yields may not be absorbed by roots when high concentrations of these nutrients exist in the top two or three inches and low concentrations are present deeper in the rooting zone where root activity is greater. According to Dr. George Rehm of the University of Minnesota, one of the top researchers today in conserva- tion -tillage fertilization techniques, we would find nutrient stratification to be of greater concern in regions where rainfall is limited and there is a high probability that the soil surface will remain dry during the growing season. Nutrient stratification may not be a major concern in conservation tillage systems if we recognize that the distribution of roots is altered by the tillage system used. Studies in Indiana have shown that there is a higher concentration of roots near the soil surface in a no -till system. Thus, if soil moisture is adequate and there are no restrictions to root development in the rooting zone, corn should be able to use P and K concentrated near the surface. In situations where nutrients can be fixed, the potential for fixation is greater for broadcast and incorporation systems and less for surface applica- tion in no -till or sub -surface banding. With repeated placement of P and K below the soil surface, the concentra- tion of these two nutrients should increase with time, fixation should be reduced, and efficiency of use should increase. With adequate moisture and no restrictions to root growth, im- proved yield should be the result. Evidence is accumulating that the presence of fertilizer in concentrated bands below the surface is beneficial to crops. Dr. Stan Barber at Purdue University has demonstrated that corn yields are higher when fertilizer is ap- plied in strips on the soil surface and plowed under. As field research continues, fert- ilizer management systems that will take the stratification scenarios into consideration will evolve. The following are soil -sampling recommendations for different conser- vation -tillage techniques from five U.S. land-grant universities. University of Wisconsin: Take a minimum of one composite sample per 5 acres regardless of chisel plow and off -set disking. Take soil sample to 3/4s of the tillage depth used. When possible, take samples before fall or spring tillage; sampling depth can be determined more accurately and fertilizer bands applied for the previous crop can be avoided. In no -till, take samples to a depth of 7 inches for fertilizer reconunenda- tions. Sample between rows to avoid all fertilizer bands. When N is surface - applied, take an additional shallow 0 to 2 -inch sample to monitor pH changes. In ridge -till, sample ridges to a 6 -inch