The Rural Voice, 1998-02, Page 40preconditioning program designed
after a meeting of the Ontario
Cattlemen's Association, Beef
Improvement Ontario, OMAFRA,
breeders groups, nutritionists and
veterinarians.
It is in the best interests of the
cow -calf producer and feedlot owner
to co-operate, Dr. Bridge said. "The
cow -calf guy and the feedlot guy
might as well be married," he said.
Too often in the past, however, they
have thought that if one is to win, the
other has to lose.
The preconditioning program was
designed to produce a better calf for
the feedlots. If the calf is worth more,
then the feedlot owner can afford to
pay more for it.
The preconditioning program
requires all calves to be vaccinated
with a booster applied. They are
treated for worms and warbles and
weaned.
Numbers of preconditioned calves
sold at the first sale were
disappointing, Dr. Bridge admitted.
There was an offering of 81 calves
with 39 sold at the sale, 17 being sold
at another sale, and 25 being
retained.
Of the group, there was no
mortality when the cattle were put in
the feedlot. One buyer had to treat
two or three head.
Bridge testified to the value of the
OPAC preconditioning program from
his own experience. He bought some
OPAC Charolais calves at 15 cents a
pound more than he paid for some
non-OPAC Blonde d'Aquitaine
calves. He thought at the cheaper
price the Blonde d'Aquitaine cattle
were a bargain, he said, but the
Charolais were now 50 pounds
heavier and look like the best deal.
Ken Alton of Lucknow supported
the OPAC program, saying he had
bought three of the calves. "Those
are the kind of cattle we've got to
have if we're going to compete," he
said.
Bill Davis of Dobbington said the
preconditioned calves seemed to
respond better to treatment if they did
get sick.
Ron Kuhl of Keady Livestock,
cow -calf producer Myles Ryan of
Markdale and feedlot operator
36 THE RURAL VOICE
News
Harold Klages of Desboro all
discussed the presorting,
prevaccination program instituted
this fall at several feeder sales at the
sales barn.
The requirement for the sale was
that calf producers give their animals
a four-way vaccination, and had to be
castrated one month before the sale.
A demonstration was set up in
August at which cattle were
vaccinated, dehorned and castrated.
Cattle were tagged for identification.
Cattle were presorted according to
weight and sex. Lists of offerings
were faxed to some buyers. One
buyer had the cattle he wanted picked
out before he arrived for the sale.
There was a follow up with buyers
to see if there had been any health
problems with cattle bought and most
buyers were very satisfied with the
cattle. There was some problem with
pneumonia that was not covered in
the vaccines applied. Next year, Kuhl
says, he'll require the vaccine to
prevent pneumonia too and ask that
cattle be castrated two months before
the sales.
One of the cow -calf operators
taking part in the sale was Ryan. He
castrated and dehorned early,
between one and three weeks of age,
then vaccinated in September, giving
a booster two weeks later. He
estimated the additional cost at about
one cent per pound.
With the calves presorted, the
most calves he had in any one lot was
six, Ryan said. "We were part of 31
lots." Convenience was a major plus.
Instead of six or seven hours of
selling under the old method, 1200
calves were sold in just two and a
half hours.
Asked if there was an extra
premium for his extra work, Ryan
said calves were selling for $200
more than last year, but prices in
general were higher this year. "Time
will tell whether you get paid for it or
not."
Klages liked the program but said
"The most important thing was that
producers can work together to try a
new idea."
He described presorting or
preconditioning as "a kind of
packaging. The performance of the
calves will determine the true value."
Continuing the theme of co-
operation he predicted "The future
will belong to those who arc part of a
win/win arrangement."
Dale Pallister of Dundalk, who
chaired the panel agreed. "If the beef
industry in Ontario is going to
survive in North America we're
going to have to co-operate."0
High carryovers bad
news to crop prices
Carry-over drives the commodity
pricing mechanism and increased
carryovers will mean crop prices
won't be strong, Colin Reesor,
OMAFRA Commodity Marketing
Specialist told the Crops Day at
Grey -Bruce Farmers' Week in
Elmwood.
Corn prices are under pressure
because predictions for carryover
(stocks of a grain left over when a
new crop comes on line) are
increasing, Reesor said. Carryover is
important because if there isn't grain
left over people hoard and stockpile.
If there is an increased carry-over
there is less fear of shortage and
more hand-to-mouth buying.
The USDA prediction (prior to the
January 13 update) was for the carry-
over to be about 10 per cent of total
needs, larger than when prices were
driven up earlier in the '90s but much
less than in the mid -'80s when
stocks -to -use ratio was about 50 per
cent of use and prices collapsed.
Corn supply in the U.S. has been
pretty consistently around 10 billion
bushels, Reesor said. With industrial
uses for sweeteners or ethanol, usage
has been creeping up and use for feed
is high but the swing point in pricing,
and the soft part in the current usage,
is exports. Exports are not meeting
expectations and "the longer this
goes on, the more out of whack the
expectations may become."
The former Soviet Union
countries have turned from importers
of grains to, in some cases, exporters
of feed -grain, Reesor said. The
problem is their meat production is
dropping. "They've consumed their
livestock herd and it will take a long
time to rebuild the herds."