The Rural Voice, 1992-10, Page 10FARM
SAFETY
FACTS
FROM THE
WEST WAWANOSH
MUTUAL INSURANCE
COMPANY
Silo Gas Kills
• Nitrogen dioxide (silo gas) can
remain in a silo up to 4 weeks
after filling.
• Post warning signs near the
silo and keep family members
and visitors away during danger
periods.
• The only way to enter silos
where gas may be present is
with a self contained breathing
apparatus.
When you need insurance call:
Frank Foran
R.R. 2, Lucknow 528-3824
Lyons & Mulhern
46 West St-, Godench 524-2664
Kenneth B. MacLean
R.R. 2, Paisley 368-7537
John Nixon
R.R. 5, Brussels 887-9417
Donald R. Simpson
R.R. 3, Ripley 395-5362
Delmar Sproul
R.R. 3, Auburn 529-7273
Clinton 482-3434
Laurie Campbell
Brussels 887-9051
Slade Insurance Brokers Inc.
Kincardine 396-9513
Chapman -Graham Insurance Brokers
Owen Sound 376-1774
Chapman -Graham -Lawrence
Walkerton 881-0611
West Wawanosh
Mutual Insurance
Dungannon
Ont. NOM 1R0
519-529-7922
1-800-265-5595
V•9
6 THE RURAL VOICE
Keith Roulston
Caught between two extremes
I tempted schizophrenia last week.
Within a 24-hour periodin which I sat
down to catch up on some back issues
of Brewster Kneen's The Ram's Horn,
I also heard a speech by Prof. Larry
Martin of the
George Moms
Centre.
Where you
stand on a line
between these
two polar ext-
remes is a sort of
litmus test defin-
ing your political
views on
agriculture.
Martin is the
pro -market, free
enterprise,
research chair of
the George
Morris Centre, a
think tank that throws around terms
like "competitiveness" while attacking
"protectionist" vehicles like supply
management. Kneen isn't quite as
well known but his views are just as
strongly held. He is a one man think
tank for a more self-sufficient, nature -
oriented agriculture, railing against
the dominance of multi -national food
companies.
The two voices are about as far
apart as you can get, yet both are
valuable in making us think, and
rethink, about our beliefs in agricul-
ture. Martin constantly questions the
current state of agriculture, suggesting
there must be more co-operation
between producer, processor, retailer
and consumer while at the same time
blasting those barriers he sees in the
way of Canadian competitiveness.
Questioning the status quo is always
valuable in that it forces us to think
about why we believe what we
believe.
Kneen provides the same quest-
ioning voice from the other side. He
pointed out in a recent edition, for
instance, that at the same time tomato
growers in California were taking cuts
in prices of nearly 50 per cent and
Ontario growers dropped their prices
12 per cent to encourage processors to
stay in Canada, Anthony O'Reilly,
CEO of H. J. Heinz made $75 million
in salary, bonuses and stock options.
That salary, Kneen said, invested at
the expected rate of return for Heinz
investors of 25 per cent, would keep
19,000 Mexican tomato pickers
earning $4 a day working forever.
The two men represent the
extremes of two opposing views of
democracy and the market. Martin
says "these are the rules of the market
so you better adapt to die" (of course
he is ready to change the rules for
things like marketing boards). Kneen
says "the system isn't working on
behalf of people so the system should
be changed".
Martin's supporters can point to
the failure of Communism in eastern
Europe to support their claim that only
a competitive system keeps an
economy dynamic enough to survive.
Kneen can point to all kinds of
examples of international companies
being large enough to manipulate the
rules of the marketplace.
Martin embraces free trade as the
ultimate statement by the intemational
marketplace. Kneen sees it as the next
logical move by multi -national food
companies who want to set the rules
free from the restrictions that can be
imposed by politicians answering the
democratic will of the people: things
like environmental standards, mini-
mum wages and health and safety
standards.
Both can be unfair. Martin portrays
those who want to protect supply
management as people not willing to
meet competition, yet look in your
neighbourhood and you'll see dairy
and poultry farmers who are the most
progressive farmers around. They are
efficient, they just don't want unfair
competition. Kneen calls groups like
AgCare and the Environmental
Agenda program apologists for the
major chemical companies, when you
know many good farmers who support
these goals who have helped change
agricultural practices for the better.
Yet both are worth listening to. It's
how you sort out what you believe
after hearing them that confuses
things.0
Keith Roulston is editor and publisher
of The Rural Voice as well as being a
playwright. He lives on a small
acreage near Blyth, Ontario.