Loading...
The Rural Voice, 1991-05, Page 14FARM SAFEIY FACTS AGRICULTURAL CHEMICALS MUST BE PROPERLY STORED TO PREVENT DAMAGE AND ACCIDENTS! Safety Tips • Lock chemical storage areas securely and post warning signs. • Never store protective equipment with chemicals. • Always store pesticides in original containers. • Read label for proper storage instructions. • Store herbicides away from insecticides and other materials including feed and seed. When you need Insurance call: Frank Foran R.R. 2, Lucknow 528-3824 Lyons & Mulhern 46 West St., Goderich 524-2664 Kenneth B. MacLean R R. 2, Paisley 368-7537 John Nixon R R 5, Brussels 887-9417 Donald R. Simpson R.R. 3, Ripley 395-5362 Delmar Sproul R.R. 3, Auburn 529-7273 Laurie Campbell Brussels 887-9051 Slade Insurance Brokers Inc. Kincardine ..396-9513, Port Elgin 389-4341 Owen Sound 376-1774 West Wawanosh Mutual Insurance Dungannon Ont. NOM 1R0 519-529-7922 (69 10 THE RURAL VOICE WILL GRIP LEAD TO OVERPRODUCTION? Robert Mercer is editor of the Broadwater Market Letter, a weekly commodity and policy advisory letter from Goodwood, Ontario LOC 1AO. Although government officials deny the new safety net programs will be pro- duction stimulating, there is hardly one economist or analysis to date that suggests acreage will be less than last year. As the end of March, Statistics Canada released the prospective plantings report for Canada which was taken prior to the implementation of the GRIP programs across the country. Now that most of these programs are in place, the farmer response is seen to be greater than expected. Of ma- jor concern to all farmers and farm leaders should be the international reaction to Canada's new programs if they are seen as counteracting the GATT standstill agree- ment on subsidy levels. If Canadian grain production increases, then our shipments could be countervailable. A detailed study from the U.S. sug- gests Canadian wheat acreage this year could be an all time record, with the west at 34.88 million acres (ma), up from 33.78 ma last year. This is based on the estima- ted returns to prairie wheat in the area of S4.15 per bushel. This is well above the current market returns. Other beneficiaries of the GRIP will be corn and soybeans. The major losers will be the input indus- tries as the way the program works, it appears to be of greatest benefit to those with the lowest costs. It is expected in the west that sales of fertilizer and pesticides will fall in relation to total acres, but because summer fallow acres will be cut, actual input sales may hold their own. Not only is the program seen as stimulating to current acres, but it is expected to bring a reduction in summer fallow acres in the west by as much as 1.4 ma. This land, plus new acres brought into cultivation, will boost Canadian grain po- tential this year. In Ontario, the immediate result of the program has seen much of the benefit capi- talized into land rent with the landlords the gainers, not the farmers. This has often been the case for government assistance programs, especially those of interest rate reduction. Ontario's corn acreage has been set by the early Statistics Canada report at 1.8 ma, up fractionally from last year. Some feel this level could rise to the near two million mark if seeding conditions favour corn over beans. The soybean acres are expected, by some, to surpass the Statistics Canada figure of 1.431 million acres due to the winter wheat acres that did not get planted last fall, rising prices, and the pro- duction incentives in GRIP. There is also some thought that the closure of one of the three remaining soybean crushing plants in Ontario may have a negative influence on farmers' confidence this planting season, thus offsetting the GRIP boost. In any case, the 15 per cent Statistics Canada in- crease is too high. Analysis by The United Grain Growers in Winnipeg says there will be more grain in the west looking for a home in the east, once the harvest is over, because of GRIP. Both approaches to GRIP say the greatest benefits of the GRIP will be in the early years. The U.S. study finds that the level of government subsidy payments for all forms of grain assistance will peak in 1992, with 1993 being lower by 37 per cent from that level. This confirms the fears of some producers who see changes in the program possibly increasing premi- ums, while decreasing returns the longer the program runs. One thing to look for in Ontario is a form of control over acreage such as in Saskatchewan, where the maxi- mum cap is 110 per cent of the producer's three-year moving average of cropped acres. Remember the sign-up conditions spe- cify you must sign up all eligible crops and give three years' written notice to drop out. After dropping out, you must stay out two years, and when re-entering, you only get 50 per cent coverage the first year, 75 per cent the second, and full coverage in the third. If Ontario farmers do carry through with the expected increase in cropped ac- res, coin will likely be priced on the export basis, (also lower demand from Quebec) and some of the small grains could move to a premium. There is strong potential for good prices for milling oats and even mixed grain by the end of 1991, and these crops will be poor cousins to corn, wheat, and soybeans in seeded acres. Take care not to follow the crowd too closely, you may get trampled on in the world of the real market -place. Govern- ments have to get elected.0 T