The Rural Voice, 1990-11, Page 64PERTH tfik
County Pork Producers NEWSLETTER
Vince Hulshof, President
R. R. 1, Sebringville, NOK 1X0 393-5586
The Rural Voice is provided to Perth
County Pork Producers by the PCPPA
I'm writing this piece on an Ottawa -
Toronto flight. It is a fitting end to a
discouraging week. I have just been
bumped off the direct flight to London
— it was oversold. My friend (who was
not bumped) is waiting for me in Lon-
don with my husband. (I hope.)
We were in Ottawa to attend a con-
ference entitled "Rural and Small Town
Canada: Economic and Social Reality."
The conference was organized by Sta-
tistics Canada in co-operation with
Agriculture Canada and the Agriculture
and Rural Restructuring Group.
We waited in vain for good news at
the conference, described by one frus-
trated participant as "days of bloodless
statistics."
The first speaker, David Freshwater
of the University of Kentucky, set the
tone with his presentation entitled "Fall-
ing Further Behind." He told us that
increased knowledge has not translated
into improved conditions, that economi-
cally, rural residents are now considered
equal to inner city residents in their
poverty rate.
He has three main concerns. First,
the growing divergence in real income
between rural and urban residents.
Second, the emergence of non -rural
interest groups dictating land use poli-
cies (eg. Temagami and Rafferty Dam
in Canada). Environmental concerns
arc breaking down into a rural versus
non -rural conflict. Where will land use
policies be set, at the township, county,
regional level, or thousands of miles
away?
Dr. Freshwater's final point is that
changing technology is resulting in an
out -migration from rural areas. Eco-
nomic growth in the future will be de-
pendent on access to telecommunica-
tions. In the absence of access to tele-
communications networks rural growth
will be impeded.
Smaller hospitals cannot afford to
keep up with the changing technology.
Improved transportation makes it easier
to by-pass local hospitals. In America
rural hospitals are closing because of
fewer patients and the resulting higher
costs due to low volume. Without local
hospitals rural growth is discouraged
because of lack of access to emergency
60 THE RURAL VOICE
and health services.
Changing technology has an urban
bias. We have higher costs in rural areas
due to lack of volume.
Dr. Freshwater's points were echoed
by Canadian presenters. What are the
implications of this for Ontario farmers?
We need to consider how changing tech-
nology will impact on farm families and
look for solutions.
000
Have you recently purchased a
computer or are you considering
whether a computer will fit into your
farm business? An introductory four -
session course will be held at the St.
Paul's Township Hall, November 20 -
December 11. The course is designed to
show farmers the capabilities of micro-
computers as a management tool in their
farm operation. Through hands-on
work sessions, DOS, a spreadsheet pro-
gram, and word-processing will be ex-
amined. The course will also provide
information to assist in making an in-
formed computer buying decision.
"Farm Business Management with
Microcomputers" is designed for farm-
ers who have a working knowledge of
computers. Numerous production and
financial management software pack-
ages will be examined (Bedford,
Farmhand, Farm Management Systems,
RoyFarm.) Participants will have a
hands-on opportunity to test these pack-
ages in order to select appropriate soft-
ware for their farming operation.
Other computer courses scheduled
include: Advanced Farm Planning Us-
ing Micros, Introduction to Word Per-
fect 5.1, and Introduction to Lotus 123.
Farm business management courses
will include, Farm Record Keeping and
Analysis, Finance and Credit, and
Commodity Marketing. Call the OMAF
office at 271-0280 for registration infor-
mation.0
Carol Rock
HOG PRODUCTION IN THE 80s
Ontario hog producers are working
harder and smarter!
At the outset of the 80s Ontario's
sow herd was reported to be 375 thou-
sand head. According to Statistics
Canada, Agriculture Division the sow
herd grew steadily through to 1984
when it peaked at 383 thousand. Just
when our competitors began accusing
the Ontario industry of unprecedented
expansion the Ontario herd began to
decrease in size. The sow herd in 1989
was 333 thousand while 1990 figures
suggest a further 1.5 per cent decline.
The decline in marketings has not been
at the same pace as that demonstrated for
sows. OPPMB marketings in the final
quarter of 1990 are estimated at 1.1
million or 8.7 per cent below 1984 4th
quarter marketings. This compares
favourably to a 14.4 per cent decline in
sow numbers for the same period. The
obvious conclusion is that Ontario pro-
ducers through superior genetic stock,
and improved facilities and manage-
ment techniques are achieving more
with less!
MANAGING OUR FUTURE
"Ontario should produce hogs," says
chairman Jim Goodhand, "It is one of
the things we do best." Goodhand was
talking to the delegates at the Board's
semi-annual meeting held recently in
Toronto.
During the board's first fifty years
there have been many changes in the hog
industry and there are more changes on
the horizon. Managing those changes
will be the challenge for Ontario's hog
producers in the 90s. We have the land
base and climate, the managers, the
facilities, the genetic stock, the govern-
ment services, the market and a unique
marketing system which will allow
Ontario to be an efficient hog producing
province well into the future.
Goodhand told the councilmen that
they cannot rest on their laurels. There
are issues such as food safety, the green
movement, government spending re-
straints, trade issues and packer viability
which must be dealt with now and in the
near future. Tough issues which are
going to require some deep thought and
forward thinking on the part of the prov-
ince's hog producers.
"My gut tells me that this organiza-
tion will continue to use change to its
advantage. It always has in the past ... it
is up to us (producers, councilmen and
directors)," concluded Goodhand.