Loading...
The Rural Voice, 1990-02, Page 63PERTH Irtk County Pork Producers NEWSLETTER Clare Schlegel, President R. R. 4, Stratford N5A 6S5 655-2750 ' The Rural Voice is provided to Perth County Pork Producers by the PCPPA PCPPA ANNUAL MEETING: JANUARY 26, 1990 PRESIDENT'S REPORT 1988 has quickly but not quietly gone by for pork producers in Ontario and Perth County. Currently, we are experiencing one of the most unsettling times in our industry. The "window of opportunity" in the tripartite stabilization program early this year allowed this program to be- come almost universal in Ontario and across Canada. 1989 has seen large pay- outs in this program for all four quarters because of relatively low hog prices and incredibly high costs for feedstuffs. Some weaner producers have been forced out of business, while some fin- ishers who survived the drought of 1988 with adequate feedstuff suppliers have never had a better year. Our concern for 1990 is the lowering support levels and the tremendous deficiency in the fund. This is compounded by countervails and the increase in the value of our Canadian dollar. Many of us thought the Free Trade Agreement, now called CUSTA, would assure us continued access to the U.S. market. Apparently, it never outlawed U.S. countervail action, but only affects the appeal process. We found this out. The response to U.S. countervails on pork imposed in September by the Canadian industry was to help the pack- ers offset this retroactive, unknown quantity by imposing a $2 per hog charge for every hog shipped in Canada until the end of March, 1990. Our directors discussed this costly issue on four occasions, and all present at our November meeting approved the action taken by our provincial board. Some other countries came out in oppo- sition to the decision, causing the De- cember appeal to the Farm Products Tribunal in Guelph. This disastrous price drop in Decem- ber is a continuing serious concern be- cause the spread between U.S. prices and ours is far greater than it has been for a long time. It seems there has been some negative bureaucratic interven- tion which has caused some of the ex- porting packers to lose their confidence 60 THE RURAL VOICE in the U.S. pork market. I hope that by the time this is published the situation has been righted, because from my per- spective it is costing our producers about $20 per 100 kg or more. Pork quality has been stressed this year. We have toured J. M. Schneider livestock handling and kill facilities. They demonstrated the effects of PSE in pork with a display. Last January we held the initial pork quality seminars. Also in relation to this theme, at our directors meetings we talked with a representative from Staffens Food Mar- kets, among others. Many other activities which hap- pened on your behalf in 1989 were re- ported by others at the annual meeting. Your county directors are your link to the activities and actions of your Ontario Board. Each hog producer in Perth County should make use of and support his or her county organization. It is encouraging to be part of an organization with so many success - minded people. Our aggressive industry will survive this current trough of pessi- mism and low prices.° Clare Schlegel President 1989 1989 HOG REVIEW While hog production in Ontario was down 5.4 per cent in 1989, total Canadian hog production is up approxi- mately 1 per cent. More significantly, hog production in the U.S., while de- clining in the last quarter of 1989, was up 1 per cent over 1988. These strong hog numbers meant a slow -down in the price recovery process. Supply, however, was not the only factor contributing to the price trends of the past year. Other factors which had an impact on the price of hogs included packer kill capacity, the desire by indi- vidual packers to maintain their market share, and international and inter -pro- vincial trade issues. In the last two weeks of 1989, there was fluctuation in prices both from day to day and from market to market. These fluctuations were caused by a negative packer response to uncertainty in the export market, specifically the U.S. Quebec packers operated only five days over the two-week Christmas and New Year's holidays. Increases in pork prod- ucts moving into the Ontario retail market from packers based in Western Canada resulted in a lower storage fa- cilities filled. They responded by bid- ding lower for Ontario hogs. Ontario sales for the year were 4,365, 967, down 5.4 per cent from a year ago. Our pork industry of the 1990s will be the most challenging and exciting that we have ever faced. What with trade problems (free trade and GATT), financial problems (low returns, high input costs, high interest rates), con- sumer desires (food safety and quality of product), and animal welfarist demands (the housing and the transportation of hogs), if there was ever a time that an individual and producers must be united to overcome the problems and meet the opportunities that confront us, this is it.0 Cinth Vogels R. R. 2, Dublin.° Date to Remember Excellence in Swine Production 2 Tuesday, February 13, 9:30 a.m. Upper Kinsmen Hall, Stratford Fairgrounds Topic: Swine Housing and Behaviour