Loading...
The Rural Voice, 1990-01, Page 25Bill on the horizon, watch for Canadian farmers to be the losers. THE U.S. FOOD SECURITY ACT AND THE EEP In 1990 the U.S. Farm Bill will likely be quite similar to the current (1985) legislation. This means that programs designed to dump U.S. product on the international markets will continue. THE ENVIRONMENT Agricultural sustainability is a worthy goal, but government pronouncements such as those contained in the Mulroney govern- ment's paper, Growing Together, must be backed up by action. I feel that financial incentives are the best approach to ensure farm viability during this difficult time... JACK STAFFORD, 1st VICE-CHAIRMAN GAY LEA FOODS FREE TRADE In the milk industry, free trade could be devastating if the border opens up to raw milk. My own thoughts are Canada will have to lower its standards on food or the U.S. will have an unfair ad- vantage. And farmers will have very little say in dispute settling. FARM FINANCING Farm Credit should not be the last resource for financ- ing. An interest -rate rebate will have to be put in place if Ontario farmers are going to compete with other provinces and the U.S. PRESERVING FARM LAND We have more land in production now than is needed to feed the population. Severances in some areas need some restriction but the farmer also needs protection from complaints that arise when the city dweller moves to the country. BIOTECHNOLOGY The better use of biotechnology could reduce the amount of chemicals that are now necessary to obtain high production. LYNN GIRTY ONTARIO SEED CORN GROWERS FARM FINANCING The FCC must become the major provider of farm credit for both the long and inter- mediate term. It must become the "Home Administration" of Canada in order to help level the playing field. CROP INSURANCE There will be some minor changes shortly, but there will have to be major changes as part of a long-term commitment to an expanded self -developing agricultural industry that will supply a much greater portion of our own market but a smaller export market. THE GATT GATT will not achieve its goal of liberalized trade. However, GATT will be reconvened to assist in developing more orderly managed export trade as countries continue to form trading blocks and move towards more managed production within their own borders. In the short term, Canada will give in totally on Article XI, but eventually Canada will follow the rest of the world and become better managed. Countervail actions from the U.S. will increase yearly throughout the 1990s. FOOD HEALTH Consumers' fears will not be soothed by reality until the store shelves are bare. However, increased monitoring will help slow the increasing fear. Education efforts will have to increase. But, as with Alar, when the fear level goes too high so quickly, farmers must abandon the product to alleviate consumer panic. Govern- ments then must close the borders to imports until the safety of products banned in Canada is 100 per cent guaranteed. THE FEDERAL DISCUSSION PAPER The paper is unfortunately based on the early 1980s drive for unfettered free trade. The world movement since the summer of 1989 is towards more managed trade, so this paper is dated and out of "sync." The federal govemment will probably have to change in order for Canada to catch up with the rest of the world. RON GARLAND ONTARIO SHEEP MARKETING AGENCY FREE TRADE I expect to see the dollar at par, which will eliminate the only advantage we have now. In the lamb industry we will likely see a restriction on Canadian lamb by the U.S., as the Americans are preparing to countervail New Zealand lamb and fear it will come into Canada and go south as Canadian product. ANIMAL RIGHTS Yes, the issue will be prominent. We will have to get our production systems in line. Sheep producers in OSMA have set a high priority on a code of production practice. We are also seeing the removal of predator controls as a major concem. THE ENVIRONMENT I admit the concern is there and real. Let us get our house in order before we are legislated into practices that will be detrimen- tal to agriculture. Tic all support programs into environmentally sound practices. BIOTECHNOLOGY At this time we don't need biotechnology. Present overproduction means lower prices, fewer farmers, fewer farms, and the erosion of the rural community. INCOME SUPPORT Income stabilization is needed, but tripartite, I believe, extends low prices. I would propose an alternate income support scheme. THE FEDERAL DISCUSSION PAPER The paper asks agriculture to give up a lot — for no gains in return.0 JANUARY 1990 23