Loading...
The Rural Voice, 2005-07, Page 57PERTH ifetk County Pork Producers NEWSLETTER Russ Danbrook, President 519-356-2385 • The Rural Voice is provided to Perth County Pork Producers by the PCPPA. Government policy with a vision to the future Any opinions expressed herein may not necessarily reflect the views of the Perth County Pork Producers' Association. Last month's article on our competitiveness by Phil Anwender has provided lots of food for thought. It's clear that in Ontario we have some major disadvantages in input and product pricing to overcome. We must put a major effort in to try to level the playing field. There are also. however. some less -talked -about areas that we have been slipping in. that have made us competitive in the past. The main area is research and development. Too long ago when I was in college in the mid -'70s. our crop science instructor. Jim O'Toole would hammer home to us that there was a disturbing trend by governments to reduce money spent on research. As I recall. he would make the point that it would be our responsibility to keep pressure on those in power to spend on research as this is what would keep us competitive in the future. Not doing so would have consequences in our future competitiveness. Research is a long-term investment. Has his prediction come to be? My primary joy in hog farming is found in swine genetics. We have been fortunate in Ontario and in Canada to have had government money (our tax money) spent in the past into R and D which led to the development of the ROP program of the '60s. This evolved in the early '80s into the national EBV BLUP (best linear unbiased prediction) program that we still use today although it is quite enhanced from the original. This program was developed by the late Dr. Brian Kennedy of the University of Guelph. We. through research dollars developed it and it set us well ahead of the rest of the world. It provided Canadian producers with genetics that gave them an incredible advantage in carcass, feed conversion. growth rate and farrowing productivity traits. This system has been adopted around the world with pretty much every major genetics company adopting it in one form or another Our research dollars developed it. we were first in the world and we had years of benefit before others would follow. We are still ahead primarily because of Canada's unique internet- based nationally -linked herd and prompt frequent genetic evaluations and very large (possibly the largest) linked herd in the world. Almost 10 years ago the federal government decided to get out of genetic development and cut IN funding from millions to near zero PERTH COUNTY PORK PRODUCERS' PORK PRODUCTS • Smoked Pork Chops • Fresh Pork Chops • Stuffed Loin Chops • Smoked Sausage • Smoked Cheddar Sausage • Bacon Burgers • Teriyaki Pork Steaks • Vittorio's BBQ Sauce AVAILABLE FROM: Steve Hulshof (Kinkora) .......... 348-8167 Walter Bosch (Monkton) 356-9000 Ted Keller (Mitchell) 348-9836 Almost all of the provinces except Quebec have followed suit so that today in Ontario there are no government dollars spent on genetic improvement. It has been left for breeders to carry the financial burden and on project -by -project applications for funding. There will he a price to pay and I would argue we are paying already. I believe the narrowing of the gap between our genetics and those of the U.S. are a direct result of this government policy. This is only one area that 1 have used as an example hut I'm sure there are mane areas with similar stories from crop science to nutrition Leaving research solely to private and multinational companies to fund and carry out does not give us as a province or counts a competitive advantage over another counts such as the U.S Do you think we would he given lead time with a new product over the U.S. by multinationals' I would argue that we would see a delay in \ears with lead time hung given to the large lucrative t' S market that', called a competitive disadvantage and the reason that we must do the research ourselves through government policy We need to lead the way in technology. gencuc. feed and crop science as well. The deck will always he stacked against us in input and product pricing so we need to make it up through better efficiencies. We need active involvement by our governments in developing sustainable competitive agriculture in this province. This is a dramatic shift from the current government crisis management that results in too many regulations and downloading of costs to active visionary thinking with real investment into R and D and ON1 AF extension work and an actual forward looking agricultural policy' : - Submitte(/ by .h,, JULY 200-) D3