Loading...
The Rural Voice, 2005-03, Page 48Grain Markets Government help needed for farmers Dave Gordon is a commodities specialist with LAC, Inc., Hyde Park, 519- 473-9333. By Dave Gordon February 11, 2005. The USDA released their monthly supply/demand reports on February 9, 2005 and as many suspected, carryovers were raised for corn and soys. The ending stocks for wheat were reduced by 25 million bushels surprisingly because of an increase in exports. However, the carryover in all grains will be larger than last year and I think the carryovers could be raised even more as the months go by. A new U.S. Farm Bill is now under discussion with a lot of hoopla about reducing the money spent on agriculture. In reality, they are talking about plugging some loopholes and limiting the maximum amount that a farm unit can receive while basically leaving much of the program intact. The U.S. grain grower will be well looked after although there may be some shifting of acres between crops most notably going towards corn. CORN: The USDA reduced exports by 50 million bushels but left all other usage categories untouched. I am of the opinion that the export figure will be reduced in the coming months to reflect the poor weekly export sales and shipments. The growth of the ethanol industry has been touted as the saviour of the corn market and with low corn prices and high fuel prices, the plants that are up and running are making good money, but now plants cannot be built overnight. The result of building more ethanol plants will create a much stronger domestic demand base, which will replace much of the necessity to export. As far as for the crop in the bins, it will take a weather scare or an 44 THE RURAL VOICE outright drought to light a fire under future prices. Without problems somewhere in the world, prices will languish. In Ontario, basis levels have strengthened a little from last month to $.30 to $.35 over March futures. Demand for corn is steady but not overwhelming with most commercial users running a little slower than expected. For producers who stored corn in commercial facilities, the cash price of corn today is virtually the same as it was two months ago and I suspect it might be the same two months from now. SOYBEANS: The only change that the USDA made to the U.S. supply/demand was to reduce the soybean crush by five million bushels. However, they did drop Brazilian production to 63 million tonnes, which is still huge crop. So far there has been a period of dry weather, but enough rain has now fallen to alleviate the dry conditions and unless it keeps raining or we revert back to dryness, the South American crop should be huge — maybe not as big as originally thought, but still more than adequate. It is not likely that the U.S. will be able to improve their export demand unless South American cannot perform because of freight problems. Certainly, Brazil will be the source of choice for users like China, but last year, logistical problems forced some vessels to load in the U.S. In Ontario according to Statscan, December 31 soybean stocks were almost double the previous year at about 34 million bushels. Does this mean that we will have to work harder on exports and compete with the U.S. and Brazil? Basis levels were relatively strong through the end of January, but have not softened. Producers probably still hold 35 - 40 per cent of the 2004 crop and so far their only saving gface has been a weaker Canadian dollar since future prices have been hovering around $5. Soybean and canola crushes are running behind last year. It appears that many Ontario producers are planning to switch more acres to soys this year because of the lower input costs. As a result, new crop basis could be weaker than we have seen for a few years. If the Canadian dollar can manage to work its way down towards $.75 U.S. in the next few months, producers might get the opportunity to do some forward selling. It is becoming repetitious, but grain prices in Ontario are terrible and I do not see much hope of a general or broad-based rally unless there is drought somewhere in the world. It is tough for producers trying to decide what crop to grow since forward contract prices are not high enough to cover the costs of growing almost any crop. As far as old crop corn is concerned, there is no obvious event that will push prices higher. Theoretically, Ontario probably has enough corn to get through most, if not all, of the summer. I am of the opinion that producers are holding a lot of corn on farm and probably should lighten up by spring. The other option is to store until the bitter end and hope that prices improve. I have heard many producers make the comment that they are not planting as much corn or not planting corn at all this year. I think that a producer should stick to a rotation year after year and not make rash changes. If everyone moves in the same direction, you know what will happen to prices, especially in barley and oats. I realize that there are producers who are not going to have the money to plant a corn crop and instead will lean towards barley or soybeans depending on the area of the province. A shift to soybeans will have some effect on soy prices but an excess of barley acres will certainly soften barley prices. Last year at this time, producers were looking at new crop prices and making decisions on planting. There was not a crop that was not going to be profitable. However, very few growers locked in those prices and now we know the consequences. Those producers who did forward contract have done quite well.