Loading...
The Rural Voice, 2004-10, Page 50a Woodlot Management Examining silviculture sgstems Steve Bowers is a forester and forest owner, a member of the Huron - Perth Chapter of the Ontario Woodlot Association and Stewardship Co-ordinator with the Huron Stewardship Council. Last month's column discussed shade tolerance of various tree species. This trait is one of the key factors influencing the silvicultural system most appropriate for a forest area. Some readers may not be familiar with the terms silviculture or silvicultural system. Most are no doubt familiar with the word agriculture which is derived from the Latin term ager (relating to fields) and involves the culture of crops (usually in fields). The term silviculture is derived from the Latin term silva (relating to wood or forest) and involves the culture of forest crops. An agricultural system includes a series of management actions that ideally allows production to continue in a sustainable fashion. Similarly, a silvicultural system involves a series forest management activities carried out in order to maintain the forest in a sustainable, productive state to ensure BERNIE McGLYNN LUMBER LTD. BUYER OF HARDWOOD BUSHLOTS Wholesaler - Hardwood Lumber Box 385, R.R. 2, Wingham, Ont. NOG 2W0 BERNIE McGLYNN Ph/Fax (519) 357-1430 SAWMILL - R.R. #5, Mildmay, Ont. (519) 367.5789 46 THE RURAL VOICE • • • • • •• 'Mr.. continued provision of multiple forest benefits, including wildlife habitat, recreational opportunities, clean water and forest products. The three most common silvicultural systems are single tree selection, shelterwood and clearcut. Silvicultural systems tend to focus on the approach taken when trees are harvested and, to a certain extent, attempt to emulate the type of natural disturbance that would have been common in the forest prior to settlement. For example, one of the most common forest types in southwestern Ontario is upland tolerant hardwoods including species like sugar maple and beech. Typically these stands are best managed using a single tree selection system, assuming the management objectives include maintaining shade tolerant species in the stand. Under the selection system individual trees are removed at regular intervals, mimicking the natural loss of individual trees or small groups of trees in a natural stand, while maintaining a minimum level of stocking and keeping appropriate representation of trees in all size classes. As a result, trees of a variety of sizes may need to be removed during cutting to maintain the optimum distribution. This approach maintains an uneven -aged forest, meaning trees of several age and size classes are present. Poorer quality trees are icmoved wherever possible (with appropriate consideration for wildlife and other values) to concentrate growth on the best quality stems. If regeneration of species that are less shade -tolerant such as red oak or black cherry is desired, the shelterwood system may be more suitable. In the shelterwood system the larger trees are removed in a series of partial cuts. The conditions are more open than would be seen in the selection system, mimicking more severe natural disturbances that favour establishment and growth of Tess tolerant species. The series of cuts is designed to encourage natural regeneration and rapid growth of these intolerant species, while still providing some protection by the partial canopy. Once the young stand is well established, the remainder of the original trees are removed. The shelterwood system tends to result in an even -aged forest. Clear cutting is a system that many people have heard of or have seen in northern Ontario. It has received much bad publicity in the past, often justifiably. It is seidom an appropriate system for use in southern Ontario for a variety of environmental, aesthetic, ecological and silvicultural reasons. However, it is an appropriate system for shade intolerant species such as jack pine forests in northern Ontario that have evolved to respond to major disturbances like forest fires. Foresters have made significant advances in the use of clear cuts in recent years. Considerable effort is now made design them in a way that emulates natural disturbances. Typically they are now carried out in smaller patches, with irregular boundaries creating cutovers that are more ecologically and aesthetically acceptable. A variety of treatments such as planting or prescribed burning may be necessary to regenerate the stand. Clear cutting obviously results in an even -aged forest. There are also many other factors besides shade tolerance that may influence the appropriate management approach. Perhaps I can touch on them in future columns. If you have questions about woodlot management or ideas for topics you would like to see covered in a future column, please contact Steve Bowers at 519-482-3661 or steve.bowers @ mnr.gdv,on.ca.0