The Rural Voice, 2004-09, Page 541
Jim
•
BERNIE McGLYNN
LUMBER LTD.
BUYER OF HARDWOOD BUSHLOTS
Wholesaler - Hardwood Lumber
Box 385. R R 2.
Wingham, Ont NOG 2W0
BERNIE McGLYNN
Ph/Fax (519) 357-1430
SAWMILL -
R.R #5, Mildmay, Ont.
(519) 367-5789
•��
4
•
•
•
N
..S\\.•,\\.%`
Now you can
reach us by e-mail
Contact us at:
norhuron@scsinternet.com
or write to us the good
old-fashioned way at:
The Rural Voice,
P.O. Box 429, Blyth, ON NOM 1HO
50 THE RURAL VOICE
Agrilaw
Water restrictions - when and how?
Paul G.
Vogel, a
partner in the
London law
firm of Cohen
Highley LLP.
By Paul Vogel
The Ontario Water Resources Act
requires that a permit be obtained
from the Ministry of Environment for
the taking of water by means of a
well or diversion or storage of water
from a surface source of supply.
Where spring water for an
aquiculture operation utilizes gravity
flow to direct and return a continuous
flow of•spring water, is a permit
required and can the Ministry impose
conditions which will permit the
suspension or reduction of the water
taking?
In a recent decision of the Ontario
Environmental Review Tribunal
(ERT), the ERT considered an appeal
by a farm operator of the requirement
for a permit for his trout farm and
conditions imposed by the Ministry.
The water for the trout farm operation
came from three springs located on
the property. Gravity flow of the
spring water was utilized to pipe the
water directly into a building and
from there to outside ponds or
raceways, followed by settling areas
from which it was then discharged
from the property and returned to its
normal stream course. The position of
the landowner'was that "the water is
not `taken' as the water is free
flowing and cannot be stopped".
In upholding the requirement for a
permit, the ERT stated:
"The importance of watershed
information and planning has
recently been brought to the
public's attention in recent reports
and in particular with the
Walkerton Inquiry. When
information is gathered and there
is a threat to the water systems, it
is incumbent upon the public
institutions to have the authority to
act at a time when the water
supply is threatened".
The Ministry agreed that, as
constructed, spring water flowed
through the facility but asserted that
the facility could have been
constructed so that water could be
diverted. The ERT accepted a
condition imposed by the Ministry
permitting the Ministry to suspend or
reduce the taking and required
reconstruction of the facility for this
purpose. Despite concerns expressed
by the landowner that a condition
permitting restriction of water supply
would jeopardize his entire fish
inventory valued at approximately
$300,000, the ERT concluded:
"To enact (this condition), a
designated passage for the water
from the wells and springs to the
stream(s) downgrade from the
hatchery, is required without the
water passing through the
hatchery. Therefore, I believe it is
in the public's interest to have
(this condition) included in the
(permit)."
Public authorities are increasingly
concerned with the need to regulate
water taking to address impacts of
reduced water volumes, water
shortages and drought on water
availability. Even water takings
limited to the natural flow of surface
springs may be subject to regulation
and restrictive conditions which
allow for suspension or reduction of
the taking.0
Agrilaw is a syndicated column
produced by the full service
London law firm of Cohen Highley
LLP. Paul G. Vogel, a partner in
the firm, practices in the area of
commercial litigation and
environmental law. Agrilaw is
intended to provide information to
farm operators on topics of interest
and importance. The opinions
expressed are not intended as legal
advice. Before acting on any
information contained in this
column, readers should obtain
legal advice with respect to their
own particular circumstances and
geographical area.
How Safe Is
Your Chimney?
For safety's sake
INVESTIGATE
Let us show you why money
spent for a "Chimtek" chimney is
money well and wisely invested.
A discount given during Sept.
up to the 25th on all
"Chimtek" chimney orders.
C H I MTE KT+
Double lined - double insulated SAFEST &
most efficient durable masonry chimney!
Less money goes up the
chimney in the torm of
excessive smoke & ', ';aw,„eu,, o .
unburned gasses,
z
✓S'or
FJumckco
info contact &nG� n, i,''^' - .v
1 A IN, ' 1 `\ '
Line 67 # 4922, R.R. #2,
Milverton, ON NOK IMO
Voice N1ail 519-595-4919
or Frank at 519-699-4092
•
BERNIE McGLYNN
LUMBER LTD.
BUYER OF HARDWOOD BUSHLOTS
Wholesaler - Hardwood Lumber
Box 385. R R 2.
Wingham, Ont NOG 2W0
BERNIE McGLYNN
Ph/Fax (519) 357-1430
SAWMILL -
R.R #5, Mildmay, Ont.
(519) 367-5789
•��
4
•
•
•
N
..S\\.•,\\.%`
Now you can
reach us by e-mail
Contact us at:
norhuron@scsinternet.com
or write to us the good
old-fashioned way at:
The Rural Voice,
P.O. Box 429, Blyth, ON NOM 1HO
50 THE RURAL VOICE
Agrilaw
Water restrictions - when and how?
Paul G.
Vogel, a
partner in the
London law
firm of Cohen
Highley LLP.
By Paul Vogel
The Ontario Water Resources Act
requires that a permit be obtained
from the Ministry of Environment for
the taking of water by means of a
well or diversion or storage of water
from a surface source of supply.
Where spring water for an
aquiculture operation utilizes gravity
flow to direct and return a continuous
flow of•spring water, is a permit
required and can the Ministry impose
conditions which will permit the
suspension or reduction of the water
taking?
In a recent decision of the Ontario
Environmental Review Tribunal
(ERT), the ERT considered an appeal
by a farm operator of the requirement
for a permit for his trout farm and
conditions imposed by the Ministry.
The water for the trout farm operation
came from three springs located on
the property. Gravity flow of the
spring water was utilized to pipe the
water directly into a building and
from there to outside ponds or
raceways, followed by settling areas
from which it was then discharged
from the property and returned to its
normal stream course. The position of
the landowner'was that "the water is
not `taken' as the water is free
flowing and cannot be stopped".
In upholding the requirement for a
permit, the ERT stated:
"The importance of watershed
information and planning has
recently been brought to the
public's attention in recent reports
and in particular with the
Walkerton Inquiry. When
information is gathered and there
is a threat to the water systems, it
is incumbent upon the public
institutions to have the authority to
act at a time when the water
supply is threatened".
The Ministry agreed that, as
constructed, spring water flowed
through the facility but asserted that
the facility could have been
constructed so that water could be
diverted. The ERT accepted a
condition imposed by the Ministry
permitting the Ministry to suspend or
reduce the taking and required
reconstruction of the facility for this
purpose. Despite concerns expressed
by the landowner that a condition
permitting restriction of water supply
would jeopardize his entire fish
inventory valued at approximately
$300,000, the ERT concluded:
"To enact (this condition), a
designated passage for the water
from the wells and springs to the
stream(s) downgrade from the
hatchery, is required without the
water passing through the
hatchery. Therefore, I believe it is
in the public's interest to have
(this condition) included in the
(permit)."
Public authorities are increasingly
concerned with the need to regulate
water taking to address impacts of
reduced water volumes, water
shortages and drought on water
availability. Even water takings
limited to the natural flow of surface
springs may be subject to regulation
and restrictive conditions which
allow for suspension or reduction of
the taking.0
Agrilaw is a syndicated column
produced by the full service
London law firm of Cohen Highley
LLP. Paul G. Vogel, a partner in
the firm, practices in the area of
commercial litigation and
environmental law. Agrilaw is
intended to provide information to
farm operators on topics of interest
and importance. The opinions
expressed are not intended as legal
advice. Before acting on any
information contained in this
column, readers should obtain
legal advice with respect to their
own particular circumstances and
geographical area.