Loading...
The Rural Voice, 2003-05, Page 50Ag News Reasonable standards only win for agriculture Continued from page 45 be. "If we get the standards where they need to be our feeling is we don't need much funding. The only win for agriculture is to get the standards reasonable." Ben Van Diepenbeek of Ashfield wondered how an operator with multiple adjacent or nearby "small" farms would be classified. Attena said it would be up to the farmer as to whether they would declare their operation as one farm unit or more. "There is clearly flexibility in how you declare your farm unit." FitzGibbon cautioned, however, to think carefully before deciding. "As a single you could be over 300 NU." Van Diepenbeek also stated his feeling that if a person with a category one or two farm wants to be involved earlier than 2008 there should be funding available. "That would be a way to encourage voluntary compliance," agreed Armitage. "The province needs to come up with some kind of strategy on this." A young man in the audience said he was concerned because he would be taking over a large family operation and wondered if he could afford the changes. "The Minister is aware of the succession program. The government doesn't want nutrient management to be a barrier to taking over a farm. I believe there will be specialized programs to deal with new farmers rather than new farms," said FitzGibbon. The panel also explained the process for responding to complaints. The initial contact would be with OMAF. "They will seek a non - confrontational way to solve it," said FitzGibbon. Should this not happen, OMAF would contact the Ministry of the Environment. "Farmers still have protection of the courts, but the enforcement will be a much more progressive order at this point." In the end there will be prosecution if no other solution can be found. 46 THE RURAL VOICE Armitage spoke of a local advisory committee. "It would be essential for mediation of complaints. We feel there's value. There is one in Huron which has worked well and we would like to see a real commitment from OMAF on this." Bob Hallam of West Wawanosh, however, wondered if with a provincial advisory committee, comprised of farmers, municipal representatives. environmental scientists and others, the local group would be little more than puppets. As many of the complaints are nuisance. Armitage said these would be handled by the local group. "That's where we see the local advisory group active. I have heard nothing but good things about the local committee model." Concern was also expressed by several about the required inspection for manure storage. FitzGibbon said that unless the storage was in protected areas, the first technical inspection, he believed, would be done by the farmer using a checklist. An engineer need only be contacted if there's a problem. Attena concurred, adding however, that "it's a clearly contentious issue from our perspective. We don't think an engineer's inspection is practical. "We believe if the storage facility is put into the building codes and the farmer signs off that it's adequate, then it's adequate. If the government doesn't agree then they can hire their own engineer." The matter would be discussed at the advisory committee level, the group was told. Covers for dry manure storage will not be required. "The coffee shop talk of concrete bunkers with roofs simply is not true." Asked how many farms are near municipal wells, FitzGibbon said no one knows. "(The province) wants to protect wells based on the time and travel idea. If you look at much of Europe for agriculture the distance impacts are 50-90 days. The Ministry wanted two years. We can see that for toxic compounds, but if the threat is bacteria 50 days is all that's needed." Farmers were also upset about the vegetative buffers from water sources, as it means a loss of agricultural land. "If the municipality wants you to farm, you should be paid for environmental services you provide. You're not just producing timothy, you're producing clean water. This is an income -based activity," said FitzGibbon. Peter Johnston, a crop specialist with OMAF reminded however that the issue isn't just bacteria. "It's nitrates in the groundwater. They have a bigger catcher zone than 50- 90 days. Nutrient management should deal with the nitrate problem. Nitrate can be partially linked to agriculture. Agriculture has to take some of the blame." Bennett commented, "We're talking about a product that in most cases is not worth the value to haul it. Whatever we do is value to society. I just want you to think about that" Other concerns were raised about storage times, spreading, transportation and insurance. Regarding the latter, FitzGibbon said that with compliance, insurance rates should be significantly less. "The Minister has said this is as much for your protection as the environment's. This knife has two edges and both are sharp." And when will the uncertainty end? FitzGibbon said they had hoped to see the final regulation by last week or this week. "We are going to these meetings and a lot of what we're saying is our best knowledge. In terms of uncertainty, there are probably going to be five years of uncertainty." Bennett closed the discussion with commendations to the panel. "They have worked long and hard to get us where we are from where we started. I give them my total gratitude."0 The Rural Voice welcomes your opinions for our Feedback letters to the editor column. Mail to: The Rural Voice, PO Box 429, Blyth, ON NOM I HO