The Rural Voice, 2003-01, Page 670 years of study
shows diameter
cutting detrimental
I wish to correct some
misinformation propagated by the
group of loggers and sawmill
operators who wrote (in the
December 2002 issue) in response to
the October 2002 article "Spare the
Axe".
The studies that show diameter -
limit cutting is detrimental to long
term forest productivity were not
done by the Maitland Watershed
Partnerships. They have been
conducted over the last 70 years or
more in carefully controlled
experiments. Eyre and Zillgitt
published a pioneer article on the
subject in 1953. after 20 years of
research. Further studies have only
reinforced the earlier findings. The
results are clearly summarized in the
Silvicultural Guide for Southern
Ontario (2001), the standard for
forest management.
What these studies show is that the
best timber growth is achieved when
a hectare of forest is occupied by
trees of mixed sizes and where trees
greater that 25 cm diameter at breast
height occupy about 20 square
metres. Measurement of the area
occupied by standing trees is referred
to as basal area.
If the basal area is too low overall
timber growth is limited because the
space is under-utilized (analogous to
planting crops too thinly). Individual
trees may have rapid diameter
growth, but timber quality is
compromised because of excessive
branching. There may also be dieback
because of exposure.
If the basal area is too high,
competition and mortality limit stand
growth. The Silvicultural Guide
2 THE RURAL VOICE
Feedback
recommends that. if timber
production and quality re to be
maximized, after cutting, the
remaining basal area of trees over 25
cm diameter should be about 15
square metres per hectare.
What the Maitland Watershed
Partnerships study showed was that
in a sample of 100 forest stands
where basal area was measured. 77
per cent of forests had basal areas
lower than this optimal value,
sometimes much lower. A similar
study in Middlesex County in 2001
told the same story.
According to the "ideal" size class
distribution, providing the best
growth, forest in the Maitland
watershed also had overstocking of
smaller trees, meaning that they ale
competing with one another and will
have below -optimal growth. Both
these findings — too few larger trees
and too many small trees — are a
direct result of diameter -limit cutting.
Few professional foresters would
advocate diameter -limit cutting as
good forestry practice. Contrary. to
the arguments put forward in the
"logger response", all the evidence
suggests that repeated diameter -limit
cutting degrades both timber volume
and timber quality. Certainly at a
single cut the harvest volume may be
higher and the cash returns greater,
but it is like cashing in capital instead
of living on investment income.
One of the main reasons that
diameter limit harvesting has been so
widely used, and is written into so
many by-laws, is that it is simpler to
understand and easier to enforce than
basal -area -based methods. This
should not be mistaken for good
forest management.0
– Jane Bowles PhD
Ecologist
Thorndale
UPI promotes
ethanol -blended
gas too
I just received the December issue
of The Rural Voice and would like to
comment on some information in the
news report of Steve Peters' speech
to the Bruce County Federation of
Agriculture.
In the article, Peters mentions that
the Liberal party is encouraging
people to use "green fuels" and that
the only major oil company to blend
ethanol is Sunoco. This is true,
however, I would like to point out
there are other retailers of ethanol -
blended gasolines. Take for instance
the organization I work for – UPI Inc.
UPI is the only retailer to both
farms and motorists of ethanol -
blended gasolines with province -wide
coverage and we have been doing so
since the early '90s. We do retail
Sunoco fuel but I would hate for your
readers to interpret from the article
that they could only fuel up with
environmentally -friendlier fuel from
Sunoco gas bars.
UPI Inc. is the energy supplier of
choice to Ontario's Agricultural
Member Co-operatives and we also
retail directly to rural consumers
across Ontario. Our organization
supports Ontario's farmers by
retailing ethanol -blended gasolines,
which contain fuel ethanol made
from Ontario -grown corn.
As a rural publication, I would
have hoped that a rural company,
such as UPI Inc. would have been
mentioned in your article since we
are renowned for retailing
environmentally -friendlier fuels. UPI
is also the first energy supplier in
Canada to utilize modern, cost-
effective, above -ground storage and
dispensing technology in the
construction of a retail gasoline
outlet. We are constructing above-
ground gas bars which means the fuel
storage is located above ground. As a
result, it is an environmentally -
friendlier concept in gas bars and
reduces the risk of contaminating
nearby agricultural heartlands.
In fact, UPI was just awarded,
through nationwide ballots, the
Canadian Renewable Fuels
Association prestigious award in
recognition of UPI's continued
leadership and commitment to the
development of the Renewable fuels
Industry in Canada.0
– Debbie Berg
Manager, Public Relations &
Customer Care UPI Inc.