Loading...
The Rural Voice, 2002-12, Page 6Come and see us in Paisley A good selection of New & Used Cars & Trucks BUD RIER CHEVROLET - OLDSMOBILE LTD. Paisley 519-353-5651 1-800-461-0505 WE'RE MAKING A LIST... "Season's Greetings to our customers and friends. A very Merry Christmas to all!" From the staff at 111■■■■ III BRUCE TRACTOR ammo — & LAWN CARE LTD. 01, JOHN DEERE R.R. 4, WALKERTON 519-881-2231 1-800-265-3883 2 THE RURAL VOICE Feedback Not a good example of woodlot safety Being a safety -conscious forestry person. 1 was a little surprised at the, picture on the cover of the October issue . The cutter's hearing protection and face screen were up on top of his hard hat and not in the proper position at all to be of any use to protect him. He is not wearing chainsaw gloves either, and possibly no leg protection. In summary, he is a good example of what not to do, and a bad choice for your cover. – Murray Hall Wingham Forestry Service. Wingham Diameter -based cutting more productive The article "Spare the Axe" in the October 2002 edition of The Rural Voice does not educate the reader on the subject of tree harvesting in Southwestern Ontario. There is no evidence that the survey by the Maitland Valley Watershed Partnership can be labelled a study. The only fact it appears to prove is simply if you cut fewer trees at any given time, there will be more trees remaining. In order for the survey to qualify as a comprehensive study, the following criteria must be considered in the agenda. For any given woodlot it is necessary to tally the volume and value of timber removed over the last 35 to 40 years, which should include two substantial cuts. It is necessary to include the results of the most recent harvest. Finally. using the statistics previously obtained, the volume and timing of the next two harvests can be predicted. If the above criteria is considered, it soon becomes obvious that the diameter -based cutting system is more productive than leaving older larger trees scattered throughout the woodlot. Over a period of four to five cuts the woodlot will simply produce more volume. Minimum density criteria (Basal) is detrimental to this process because it encourages the retention of older, less desirable species and quality of trees. The article aptly describes how a woodlot will fill in with saplings if the large trees are removed. This is a good thing and ensures future harvests. Contrary to the opinion forwarded by the article, ash is a preferred species which grows plentiful and quickly when sunshine is available. A few years ago ash was more valuable than maple and is simply the victim of a short-term market fad at the present. time. Hard maple will only tolerate partial shade in order to thrive. Richard Keeso's vigorous support of the "All Age" criteria is somewhat suspect. First and foremost Keeso is a businessman. Basically, at the present time he operates his mill utilizing purchased logs and standing timber marked by consultants. He does not own any sizable acreage of land growing timber. Therefore, the "All Age Class" criteria would not interfere with any long-term Forest Management Planning established by his firm. Unlike the rest of the industry, he does not evaluate and calculate volume of timber observing diameter -based restrictions. The firm is operating at a competitive disadvantage versus the balance of the industry. It is necessary to deal with more vendors and operate over more acreage to acquire the necessary log supply. Keeso supports the principle of the presently proposed bylaw in Bruce because it would legislate the balance of the industry to purchase timber by the same methods. Contrary to the