HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Citizen, 1989-05-31, Page 5THE CITIZEN, WEDNESDAY, MAY 31, 1989. PAGE 5.
• Proposed changes would
v>LF LU I I j 1 CJLLfA I. Lie change face of Huron
BY KEITH ROULSTON
Debate seems likely to be loud at
the July meeting of Huron County
Council when councillors discuss
the proposals for county govern
ment reform contained in the
Report of the Consultation Commit
tee for the Minister of Municipal
Affairs.
Council approved the original
recommendations of the first study
by the committee in April 1988 but
only after considerable debate.
Councillors such as Exeter Reeve
Bill Mickel warned the study,
called “Patterns for the Future’’,
was a step on the road to regional
government but others on council
felt the report was a good one, that
it allowed county councils for
reform themselves and didn’t pro
pose to force changes.
But the latest report, issued by
the committee members after they
had toured the province (they met
in Huron June 15 last year) seems
even stronger in tone than the
original report, particularly in
areas that caused concern for
county council in discussing the
report a year ago.
The biggest argument may come
over a proposal that would impose
a minimum population of 4000 on
municipalities. The report argues
that: “A strong county system is
reliant on strong local units’’. A
strong local municipality is one
which is efficient and effective in
Strong local
municipalities
needed
the delivery of service, and accoun
table and responsive to its citi
zens.” The report says local muni
cipalities must have an adequate
tax base and staff resources to
provide the required services to the
public. “There must be a suffi
ciently large population and finan
cial base to support a range of local
services and the unit should en
compass the appropriate service
areas. In other words, the munici
pality should include the area
benefitting from local services so
that those who benefit also pay and
are stakeholders in the planning
and management of these ser
vices.” However, the report goes
on to say, “Administrative units
(municipalities) and communities
need not have the same boundar
ies.”
Concern over the size of munici
palities had been one of the topics
of conversation when the earlier
report was debated last year. The
report at that time simply recom
menced: “The minister conduct a
review of very small municipalties
and separated municipalities.”
Bayfield Reeve Dave Johnston,
now the county’s warden, wonder
ed “What’s small? 50? 500? 5000?
No one has given me a definition?”
Both county council and the Asso
ciation or Municipalities of Ontario
left that recommendation out when
they endorsed the overall proposal.
Now the M.P.P.s have put a
specific number on the size of the
minimum population and it seems
it is 4000.
At its meeting on May 18, the
executive committee of county
council disagreed with the recom
mendation for a 4000 minimum
population and proposed that each
county be given the authority to set
whatever figure it wishes. That
recommendation will come before
the entire council at its July
meeting.
Reeve Mickle was particularly
worried last year about a proposal
that would give counties “permis
sive authority to assume any local
municipal function the county does
not currently perform ... where
there is a two-thirds vote of county
council representing a majority of
local municipalities.”
The new report spells out duties
much more clearly. It says counties
should be responsible for homes for
the aged, children’s aid societies
and public health, (as they are
now), but also for waste manage
ment services and for general
welfare assistance (which Huron
county already administers). The
county should also have authority
over economic development and
New powers
to county
sewer and water, with local muni
cipalities given authority to partici
pate in the delivery of such
services. Local municipalities
would continue to be responsible
for building inspection, fire ser
vices, policing, business licencing,
street lighting, sidewalks, transit,
electricity and gas, parking, archi
tectural conservations and recrea
tion.
Areas such as acquisition and
servicing of industrial land could be
taken on by either level of govern
ment. There is no mention in the
new report of a two-thirds majority
provision.
In its recommendation the coun
ty executive committee wants to
see waste management left up to
the decision of each county. It
wants water and sewer left to the
local municipalities and it wants to
see economic development a co
operative program between the
county and the local municipality.
When the committee visited
Huron last year in its round of
hearings one thing was loud and
clear: Huron county mayors wanted
no part of being included in county
council. Eileen Palmer, mayor of
Goderich told the committee that
making mayors sit on county
council, with its day-long meetings
would preclude many people from
running for mayor. Bruce Shaw,
Mayor of Exeter agreed, saying he
had a day job and would not be able
to sit on county council. Clinton
Mayor John Balfour said the work
load of the mayor is heavy enough
without adding the responsibilities
of county council on top.
That message appears not to
have impressed the committee
because it recommends: “Heads of
all local municipalities, including
mayors of towns, be required to sit
on county council.” The committee
argues that “creating a fair repre
sentation system requires that the
Mayors to be
on council
public be able to clearly identify
council representatives and their
responsibilities.” Mayors not sitt
ing on county council, while the
heads of all other councils do, is
confusing and can cause communi
cation and co-ordination problems,
the report says.
But the county’s executive com
mittee disagreed and its recom
mendation to the whole council will
be that the mayors still be the head
of town council but that county
council be made up of the reeves of
local municipalities plus the deputy
reeve of those municipalities where
population warrants a second re
presentative. The committee report
would change the name of deputy
reeve to “county councillor” but
the executive committee disagrees.
It’s recommendation to county
council is that it wants reeves and
deputy reeves retained.
The study proposes that the
province encourage reorganization
studies in the 26 counties by
providing 50 per cent funding for a
facilitator. The county wants 100
per cent funding for both the
facilitator and the study itself.
The other hot topic from the
study’s recommendations is that
the number of county councillors be
limited to 20 members. The study
says that the large number of small
municipalities creates too many
county councillors that have more
than 30 members. “The Committee
feels county councils must be small
enough to allow for a ‘full debate’
at council in a reasonable length of
time. Every member should be
involved in a variety of issues and
should be able to speak to each
item on the table.”
The reply from the county’s
executive committee however disa
grees and says restructuring is not
needed in Huron County. Each
municipality should be represented
at county council, it argues.
There are some recommenda
tions in the study which will have
little effect on the county since
Huron already has them in effect.
We like Huron
the way it is
The study calls for all counties to
have an official plan by 1994 but
Huron has long had one. The study
also calls for county-wide reassess
ment based on market value of
property. Huron adopted that sy
stem in 1988.
For the most part though, the
executive committee is recom
mending the county go against
most of the fundamental changes
proposed in the report. Huron
County, the executive committee
seems to be saying, is working just
fine, thank you.
Letters to the editor
Time to fight to save Callander
THE EDITOR,
We as a family of a loved one
who is making her home at
Callander Nursing Home in Brus
sels, were shocked when we heard
that the Home could be closed by
1993.
We have an aunt who has made
her home there for the past five or
six years. Yes, we are sorry, that
we cannot take care of her ourself,
but she needs more care than we
can provide for her. I wasn’t aware
of the meeting concerning this
matter or I would have been there
to voice my opinion.
What does the government want
to do with these older people? Tuck
them under a bed or hide them in a
closet somewhere until they start to
smell and then dig a hole and put
them in it.
They are our loved ones and
deserve the love and respect the
same as anyone. Our aunt started
making Callander her home after
several strokes. She needed the
loving care which we as a family
couldn’t give her.
I am pleased to go and see her at
Callander because she is happy and
content there. The nursing staff are
kind to her and she is treated with
respect. She is part of Callander’s
family now and is treated with love,
kindness, and respect that she
wouldn’t get at a large nursing
home. Being confined to a wheel
chair now, she requires special
Changes proposed
The face of county government would be changed under new
recommendations in the Report of the Consultation Committee
totheMinister of Municipal Affairs. Huron County’s executive
committee has gone on record as opposing many of the key
recommendations.
is closed down and the residents
moved farther away, how many
times will these people get to see
the ones they love and hold dear.
The government can, has and
will spend millions and millions of
our tax dollars for day care for kids,
trips and dinners for themselves,
theatres, art shows and what have
you, but they can’t or won’t fork
out a few dollars to help care for
our older people.
Please, I am asking you: Help us
Fight to Keep Callander Nursing
Home Open.
Ella Gwyn
Bly th.
parents?
Then there is a meeting to set up
teams, a registration date, another
meeting to get coaches, and many
more before your child goes out to
play ball. Getting coaches in Hul
lett Township also seems to be a
big problem. There are those same
parents each year giving up a lot of
their free time to go out to all of the
practices, and games to help teach
your child the game of baseball as
well as to have some fun. It seems
to me it is about time a few other
parents took their turn, just to see
how much really is involved.
What really irked me the most, is
this same ball committee spent a
Continued on page 22
care. The nurses, bathe her, dress
her, lift her in and out of her chair
and help her in everyway. Yet, all
this is done with love and respect.
Even though there are very few
words she can say, the nurses take
time to try to understand her.
This is something I call CARE,
something she wouldn’t get in a
larger nursing home.
No, we don’t get over to see her
every week, however I can phone
her or the nurses phone me for her.
The staff invite all families to
have Christmas with their loved
ones. We can have our Christmas
dinner for a small fee. If Callander
Where are the
THE EDITOR,
Where is the support in Hullett
Township when it comes to raising
money for minor sports, such as
baseball?
What does it cost you parents out
there in Hullett to let your child
play baseball?
How much of your time is taken
to drop your child off at his ball
games and pick him up?
Where is the interest of parents
in Hullett Township?
Believe it or not, there is a lot
more for those on the organizing
committee. First they have a
meeting to get all the equipment
sorted out, and ordered each year.