Loading...
Village Squire, 1976-11, Page 4The old Exeter Town Hall, minus its belfry, may not look like much now but the Exeter Heritage Foundation feels it will when their work is complete. There are still people in Exeter who think the people of the Exeter and District Heritage Foundation are crazy. And. one can see why they might be sceptical. The Heritage Foundation's biggest task right now is to restore the old Exeter town hall to its original beauty. Less imaginative people than the Foundation members, who know the building only by its recent appearance, might wonder if there was any original beauty in the first place. The building at present is really the eyesore that critics claim it is. The old, greying white paint has little charm. The green trim is ugly. The old firehall door is boarded over with plywood. Even the interesting bell tower is gone. Is what's left really worth saving? Yes. say Doug Gould chairman of the Foundation and the other 70 members of his group. Not only is the building worth saving as a reminder of our past, but the whole restoration is economically feasible, they say. And they've done the research to prove it. They have a report by Goderich architectural adviser Nicholas Hill which told of the potential of the building and they have won the support, both moral and financial, of the Ontario Heritage Foundation. Indeed, while passersby looking at the old hall might think there is a long way to go before it shows this potential, those involved will tell you that the project has come a long way already in the nearly two years since the whole thing first began.' That was back in February 1975 when the Exeter Town Counciwas again discussing tjie future of the old building which many of the councillors had felt was beyond repair. Mayor Bruce Shaw invited about seven interested persons to form a committee to explore what should be done: was the building worth saving or should it be torn down? What were the possible future uses? And so on. The committee members had varying opinions of the project when they came to it and not all felt the building 2, Village Squire/November 1976 Determined group in Exeter wants to prove old town hall can be beautiful again should be saved. They had three months to prepare the report. They looked at buildings elsewhere which had been restored and examined the hall from top to bottom and decided they had a valuable historical landmark on their hands and it should stay. They turned in their report to the council saying just that. A few of the councillors weren't too happy with the report, committee member Joyce Monteith recalls, but Mayor Shaw was impressed with the amount of research they had put into it. The report didn't get much action and the whole matter lay dormant for a while until one morning later that summer, committee members picked up the morning paper and saw that the belfry of the hall was being removed because the council felt it was unsafe. There was no notice given of the decision because it seems a large crane had been brought in to take down an old water tower and it was decided that while the crane was on the site, it might as well take down the belfry too. The demise of the belfry seemed to spur action. The resulting publicity brought people forward to express their views. Meanwhile, back before the belfry came down. Mayor Shaw had applied for a Local Initiatives Program grant to be used in fixing up the building. Then in November, the committee was asked to make another recommendation along with a cost estimate for necessary repairs. Word had been received by this time that the L.I.P. grant had been approved, but it was subject to a matching amount being put in by the town council. Council decided it couldn't afford the 511,400 needed to match the grant so it turned down the grant. Seeing the money so close, these interested in saving the building decided to go after the grant themselves. Working through their local Member of Parliament they managed to have the grant transferred to them, no strings attached, meaning they didn't have to match the grant. At the same