The Rural Voice, 1986-09, Page 8r--
8 It We 8/164.
MACHINE
REPAIR
• Precision Machining & Milling
• Custom Built Truck & Trailer Boxes
• Combine & Tractor Overhauls
• Machinery Replacement Parts
— Custom Made
Kippen
519-262-3020
BRANDY POINT
FARMS
• Our breeding stock pro-
vides our buyers with proven
genetics from the top 3%
animals tested across
Canada • Our program
enables us to offer quality
and health at a price that is
hard to beat • We have an
ongoing supply of A.I. sired
Hamp/Duroc, York and Land -
race boars & F1 York/Land-
race gilts • All boars priced
from $275 to $375 • F1 York
Landrace gilts are priced $50
above market value hogs •
Our closed herd is ranked
"Good" by the OMAF stan-
dards.
Come and take a look at
our stock anytime!
Delivery Available
KURT KELLER
R.R. #1 Mitchell, Ontario
519-348-8043
8 THE RURAL VOICE
RURAL STRUCTURE
GETS MY VOTE
There has been a long and con-
tinuing debate on farm income in
Ontario. A number of farmers
and farm leaders have screamed
loudly that, without government
help, too many farmers will go
bankrupt.
Others have protested, if less
loud, that farm income for them
has been adequate and that those
who can't stand the heat should
get out of the kitchen.
The big disagreement arises
when it comes to discussing pro-
grams to assist farmers. Some
farm leaders in the OFA and all
of the NFU, insist that ALL
farmers should be assisted to re-
main on the land.
This position has received some
support from the Agricultural
Council of Ontario in its recent
report on the Incomes of Farmers
and Their Families. However, this
support may not be what the ad-
vocates of survival for all farmers
want. The report proposes that
only commercial farmers, those
who sell $50,000 or more annual-
ly, be the ones to receive
assistance.
The council rejects quotas as
an alternative. Instead, it recom-
mends better stabilization pro-
grams, more accurately labeled as
`income insurance' programs,
where the insured farmer pays a
premium.
The council, in view of the
world-wide over -production of
virtually all food commodities,
quite rightly believes that it is
unreasonable to expect all farm
income to come from the market.
I know that some farmers will
holler that they don't want
welfare, e.g. payment from the
consumer's tax dollars. But at the
same time, they demand, from
the same consumer, higher pay-
ment for their product than sup-
ply and demand warrants, lower
property taxes than their
neighbour pays and tax exemp-
tions for everything used in the
production of farm commodities.
Consistent they ain't.
I believe, with the council, that
minimum income payments in
some form, possibly through
negative taxation, is fully
justifiable. Then, when the time
comes that the market recovers,
as is the case presently with pork,
it will be returned as income tax.
Such assistance is not new,
despite the indignation of some.
Agriculture, as well as virtually
all manufacturing industry, is
subsidized in many different
ways. It is time that farmers set
aside their false pride and accept
the same support as others in our
society do.
One glaring contradiction in
the report recognizes worldwide
over -production of food and ra-
tionally recommends that
marginal land be reforested or
made into wetlands. But then it
reverses itself and recommends
more money for tile drainage
which would turn marginal lands
into crop lands.
A strong case has been made,
for at least fifteen years, to give
incentives to small industry com-
patible with rural living, to
establish itself in rural areas so
farmers can get off-season work.
O'Brien's council repeats this de-
mand to allow marginal farmers
(hobbyists or those incapable to
compete) to remain on the land
and thus maintain the rural
fabric.
This hasn't worked for various
reasons.
One must note the different
justification of organizations like
the NFU and OFA activists, and
the council. The first wants all
farmers to make a living on the
farms. The council wants them to
make a living partly off the farm
and partly from the farm. The
difference is significant. The ac-
tivists see farming itself as the
main issue. The council sees the
rural structure as the most impor-
tant. I vote for the council's
view. ❑
Adrian Vos, from Huron County,
has contributed to the magazine
since its inception in 1975.