Loading...
The Rural Voice, 1980-11, Page 7from phosphate rock and potash soil demands a large expenditure of energy, and producing it in their own plant means a big savings for co-op members. Having launched the first venture, members are now looking at extending their energy -producing efforts. METHYL OR ETHYL The Ontario Federation Agriculture's energy committee, of which Dr. Emery is chairman, looked at on-farm production of fuel, and has come to the conclusion that no fuel can compete with ethyl alcohol. First the committee studied methyl alcohol, or methanol, but found it not practical.Methanol,made from wood, is also knownas wood alcohol. Much has been made of the development of a hybrid poplar that was supposed to grow so fast it could supply all our fuel needs, both for burning in wood stoves and for the production of alcohol. The claims were that the tree would grow to a marketable size within six years. Dr. Emery says even if this were the case, an area of one million acres would be rquired. It just wouldn't work, the committee concluded. Ethyl alcohol, though, is made by distilling plant material. Dr. Emery said the only people currently qualified to fill the need for fuel alcohol are farmers. He warns that if farmers won't do it, the multinationals are ready to do it for them. In comparison, Dr. Emery figures that it actually costs us three dollars a gallon for gasoline produced from imported oil. W e pay about $1.25 at the gas pump and the remaining $1.75 through taxes. If a farmer makes his own fuel in an on-farm still, he can produce the equivalent of a gallon of gasoline for 30 cents, Dr. Emery asserted ETHYL REPODUCTION IS ETHICAL What is more, Dr. Emery claims, no cropland has to be taken out of food production for this purpose, as there is sufficient marginal land suitable for ethyl -producing crops. In Ontario alone, he maintains , there are 2 million acres below a line through North Buy that are considered marginal for food production. Further north are an additional 7 million acres suitable for energy crops. "We have the potential in Ontario to grow enough to supply all our needs, "he stated. "If farmers use compost for their fertilizer needs, and plants for ethyl alcohol, Ontario can be completely fuel independent," he added. These same 30 farmers who now produce compost, plan to distill 1,000 gallons of ethyl daily. They won't have any trouble marketing it as one oil company has already indicated it will buy all the alcohol the farmers can make. Dr. Emery doesn't see corn or other grains as useful for alcohol production. That would be too expensive and it doesn't have enough ermrgy since it is low in sugars, which makes it inefficient. Mangels, cut and crushed, produce twice the energy of corn, and sugarbeets are even better. The residual pulp is a highly valued, protein -rich cattle feed. Howe, er. Dr. Emery contends artichokes are the prime prospect for ethyl production •easy to grow, high in sugar, and leaving a good feed pulp. To be abl.° t' ur.. akuin• . mechanics must be trained to convert exist ...g engines lin „w uwg rile new mei. ..' . tnlery says that conversion from gasoline to alcohol will cost about $150. Dr. Emery is conviced that farmers must learn to work together in joint ventures. If a sizeable group decides to go ahead with a project, they w ill be able to hire a good manager, for they can then afford to pay for expertise and can produce efficiently. The Northumberland Co-op, located in the industrial park on the outskirts of the Village of Colborne, will soon have control over their ,.,wn fuel and fertilizer. The Agpro Industries plant produces this composting material from household garbage and sludge. Thirty farmers invested $10,000 each to form the resource recovery co-op. Barrels of municipal and processing plant waste, including, in front. frozen fruit which will be processed into rich dark composting soil. Endless belts move materia! through the Agpro garbage processing plant near Colborne in Eastern Ontario. One tonne of the compost produced contains 50 lbs. of nitrogen. THE RURAL VOICE/NOVEMBER 1980 PG. 5