The Rural Voice, 1980-03, Page 12'What am
/ bid?'
Milk board adopts
new exchange plan
BY ADRIAN VO S
Ontario Milk Marketing Board (OMMB)
officials are doing the rounds of Ontario's
counties, explaining the new quota ex-
change policies adopted by the board.
Professor Stu Lane and Dr. M.A.
McGregor, of the University of Guelph,
studied quota transfer policies on behalf of
several marketing boards last year. Since
the release of this study, the milk board
has been studying methods of improving
transferring policies, according to Ken
McKinnon, the chairman of the board.
OMMB plans to implement the new
system in March, and all milk producers
will receive a brochure outlining the
procedure through the mail.
Other research projects considered by the
milk board were studies done in B.C., and
by the Canadian Federation of Agriculture.
All studies upheld the longtime view of the
board that both the industry as a whole,
and the producers as individuals benefitted
most by a free quota price.
Mr. McKinnon outlined for an audience
of dairymen the objectives of the board in
the quota transfer system as: 1. to gain the
confidence of both the producers and the
industry in general; 2. to provide an
opportunity to all eligible producers
wanting to trade quota; 3. to reflect the
value at all times.
The procedure of selling or buying quota
is as follows: A producer calculates how
much quota he needs, and the maximum
amount he is willing to pay for it. He sends
this information by nightletter to the
computer exchange at the board office,
where it is fed into the computer. The
machine will match it with an offer to sell.
The offer to sell comes from a producer
with a surplus of quota. His nightletter
must contain the same information as in
the buying offer, with the minimum price
the seller will accept.
The computer will do all the work,
eliminating any human interference. The
matching of offers will be done once a
month.
The milk board warns that not every bid
may be accepted. If bidding is lower than
offering, no matching will take place.
This will result in a raising of the bidding
in the next month and a lowering of the
asking price. This way a true market value
will be reached.
Group I, used MSQ, and unused MSQ all
will have their own exchange and private
sales outside the system will no longer be
possible.
The 15 per cent transfer to the board will
remain in force.
The administration cost will be no higher
than a $ 3.00 service charge to the board
and $ 3.45 for the nightletter.
The board has recognized that the
computer will not always be necessary. The
exceptions are a transfer within the family,
or in ongoing operations. These transfers
will be subject to some rules.
Provision is made for new producers to
enter the business. All they have to do is to
show a certificate of serious intent, signed
by a responsible person, such as an OMAF
field representative.
The existing rule, that no shipper can
hold more than 75 per cent of group I
quota, will remain in force. The computer
is programmed to reject any bids wanting
more.
To think that the milk industry will
henceforth be ruled by a machine in
erroneous. A producer wanting more than
1,500 litres extra quota a day will be
screened, and the board will then decide if
it is in the best interest of the industry to
allow the sale.
Any producer wanting an increase of
3,000 litres a day will not even be fed into
the computer. He must fill out a special
application to the board before his bid is
put on the exchange.
If this should happen often, the board is
prepared to deal with it by developing a
special policy.
The milk hoard says it will review the
new system every six months and make
changes if necessary.
1
Mrs. Fran Breckenridge, Bluevale,
operating a band saw to cut out a
weathervane.
is seen here
pattern for a
PG. 10 THE RURAL VOICE/MARCH 1980
More wives
in winter
As you approach the classroom for the night school
course in woodworking at F.E. Madill High School in
Wingham, the whine of high-powered saws and the
sound of sanders greets your ears. Entering the
classroom it comes as a slight surprise to find as many
women as men busily sawing and sanding, measuring
and hammering.
Arthur Laidlaw, who has taught the wood-
working course for the past 9 or 10 winters, says he has
always had women taking the course. "Some come
back for several years," he said, "progressing on to
even more difficult projects." He says there have been
no accidents in all the years he has been the instructor.