HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Lucknow Sentinel, 1983-05-11, Page 2news
Lucknow Sentinel, Wednesday, May 11, 1983—Page 2
Leeknew's Centennial Baby is Ruth Ann
Henderson, daughter of Sins and Mary
Henderson of Lueknow. An honours grads.
ate in health sciences today, Ruth Ann Was
born during Lucknow's Centennial CelebraN
flans in 1958.
Centennial baby
Isabel MacKenzie of Lucknow was the
first of several to correctly identify the
picture of Lucknow's Centennial baby,
printed in last week's issue of the Sentinel.
Ruth Ann Henderson was shown in the
arms of her sister, Mary Elizabeth. Born
during .Lucknow Centennial Celebration in
1958 (Dr. M. H. Corrin missed the celebra-
tion's gala parade). Ruth Ann is the
daughter of Jim and Mary Henderson of
Lucknow.
Today she is an honours graduate in
Health Sciences from the University of
Waterloo and her sister, Mary Elizabeth
Henderson-Betkus is a public health nurse in
McBride, British Columbia.
Sewers are necessary: Bruce MOH
*from page 1
1950s when the Bruce Coun alth Unit
re ived-complaints o "sm s" in the main
usiness area or the age from village
residents.
The Bruce -County Health Unit did tests
and took samples and discovered raw
sewage in the storm sewers and the Lucknow
River in the tore area of the town.
The Bruce County Health Unit approached
the village council at the time, told the
council of their findings and explained it was
a problem that. could not be solved by
installing septic tanks or forcing residents
and business owners along the main street,
who did not have septic tanks, to install
them.
There is not enough land available in the
core area to adequately handle the effluent
from a septic tank system. The sewage
leaves the weeper beds and immediately
runs to the river.
The system in place was designed to
handle water pumps at the kitchen sing, not
the 80 - 100 gallons of water per person
which is flushed through the septic tanks
since the creation of indoor toilets, automatic
washing machines and dish washers.
Over the years village council has argued
village residents and the village treasury
could not afford sewers. There were other
priorities for the tax money being raised,
Government grants were only 25 per cent of
the project cost and at the time the whole
village would have been serviced. (Under
the present grant system, government
Jamboree parade
Have you planned your Jamboree '83
project yet? Why not enter a float in . the
parade! See the ad in this weeks paper for
• hill details on categories and prizes. Plan
early and submit your entry form to Bob
McIntosh.
Farmers discuss Bill C-653...
*from page 1
in the free enterprise spirit, says Pyke. If
there is a legitimate effort to help farmers
you cannot write him off the books.
The Act also at -tempts to bring the status
of the secured and unsecured creditor to the
same level. The Bill attempts to prevent the
secured creditor from trouncing the debtor
into the ground.
The idea of reducing the principle on the
debt has happened in special circumstances.
By reducing debt that cannot be serviced,
there are losses which won't be recouped,
but reducing debt to a level where the debtor
can meet his payments, you come out ahead
in the long run.
Pyke explained the history of the original
Farmers' Creditors' Arrangement Act say-
ing that of the 142,000 farmers in Saskatche-
Nan with a debt of more' than $482 million,
.)nly 5,094 proposals in a five year span were
accepted under the Act.
Current statistics show farmers paid $641
million in interest rates during 1981-82 and
14 pet cent of the bank loans under $1
million go to farmers. Pyke believes Hill
C-653 will provide assistance for some
farmers who have acted in good faith without
favouring the debtor to the distraction of the
creditor.
Toronto -Dominion bank representative
Larry Thompson is not in favour of the
reenactment of the Hill, because it permits
debt to be written down.
The reduction of debt and the time period
to liquidate assets are two main points of the
bill which appeal to farmers. However when
the bill was in effect during the 1930s, it
made long term debt difficult to obtain and
suppliers immediately went C.O.D.
Thompson is critical of two aspects of the
13111. It basically removes the right of a
farmer to put up security for credit and the
time lapse to go through the process of
appraisal of the assets, is a disadvantage.
Thompson noted the Hill will not help
farmers with zero equity and the farmer
must have acted in good faith with his
creditors to use the Bill.
Allan Wilford. president of the Huron -
Bruce Farm Survival Association, speaking
from the floor of the meeting. said the
impetus of the bill is to make everybody.
debtors and creditors, deal in good faith.
"The threat of the Hill is enough to make
creditors deal in good faith."
If banks are going to liquidate. they
should do it responsibly. Wilfords says he
knows of farmers who have been sitting in
limbo for more than two years. They should
get their act together and negotiate, says
Wilford.
Under the provisions of the Act, the
receiver appointed to do the appraisal of the
assets will be local and paid by the federal
government. usually, the receiver is paid by
the banker in a receivership and says
Wilford. whoever pays the piper. calls the
tune,
Film creates controversy...
•from page 1
Superintendent of program Robert McCall
said the teachers are responsible for the
films shown in the classroom and that
administration doesn't attempt to monitor
films shown in the classroom, it was noted
that the film was not available from the
board's media centre. Mr. Rau indicated the
teacher from South Huron Secondary School
had obtained the film from the Huron
County Health Unit.
Mrs. Regier said she has five students
attending the Exeter High School with two ir.
Grade 12. The Zurich woman said she was
responsible for obtaining the film and having
it shown to the group of parents.
The board has referred the matter to its
education committee and Mrs. Regier said
she will "just have to wait and see what the
board does".
grants pay 75 per cent of the capital cost of
the project).
Over the years exchanges between council
and health unit representatives continued,
acknowledging the problem could not be
eliminated by septic tank systems.
As the director of inspection for the health
unit points out, if septic tanks would have
solved the problem, residents and property.
owners would have been forced to install
them.
In 1977 village council commissioned a
study which reported septic tank systems
were inadequate in the core area and sewers
was the only way to solve the problem of raw
sewage in the Lucknow River.
Council looked at several design proposals
and chose a design including a sewage
collection system by individual services
throughout the commercial core area and
then north along Stauffer and Inglis Streets
to Gough Street; a pumping station with
stand-by power and a sewage treatment
plant including land disposal of effluent.
Why is the entire village not being. serviced?
When sewage works were originally
desgined for municipalities, the entire
municipality was put on the system. But in
recent years, governments have found they
have to cut costs to make their funds go
further. As a result, the Ministry of the
Environment will not provide sewage service
for that part of a municipality which is
functioning properly on a septic tank system.
In Lucknow this means only the core area
of the village will be serviced. The provincial
government is not willing to provide funding
to service the entire village, when the
remainder is functioning properly on septic
tanks. The competition for public funds is
increasingly demanding and the government
must be more selective in funding various
programs.
According to Burns Ross, it is unlikely the
entire village will ever be serviced unless the
provincial treasury finds money it doesn't
know how to spend.
The sewage system proposed at the
present time will only tolerate the expected
expansion in the serviced area and a new
system would have to be built to service the
entire village.
Does the existance of an emergency gravity
overflow from the pumping station to
Lucknow Creek mean raw sewage will still
be dumped into the Lueknow River after the
sewers are in place?
A notice appeared in the Lucknow Sentinel
April 13 and April 20 outlining the Village
Council application to the Ontario Municipal
Board for approval of the sewage works
construction and the passing of proposed
by-laws to impose such sewer rate to raise
the whole or the annual payments on the
debentures to cover the cost of the project.
Included in the notice was a description of
the sewage works which indicated the
sewage dumping station is equipped with an
Turn to page 4•
Plttsburgh Exterior
Homecare Paints
Oil Base • Latex Base
Can Be Tinted To Colour Required
Patio Stones
18"x 18"-24"x24„
Sidewalk Slabs
24"x30" -24"x36"
7
Aimee-
pd
St. Lawrence Cement
PORTLAND AND MASONRY
JOHN W. HENDERSON LTD. LUCKNOW. ONT.
Business Hours Mon. to Fri. 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
Sit. 8 a.m. to Noon Phon* 528 3111