The Lucknow Sentinel, 1983-02-16, Page 6editorial
Lbw Sentbsel, W 16, 1. e 6
LUCKNt$V SENTINEL
,• The y iown"
Established 1571
1HOM AS A THOMPSO\ • Ad.e+rt`son,g Manager
SH:\RON 1 DIFT7 1 dnes.r
PA1 6 I! I\(,ST'O\ Office Manager
9OA\ HFt.l1 (onipysoa.w
MI -RI F. ft LIOTT - Typesetter
Busoness and 1-elno za Office Telephone S2b-21x22
\Isabee* Ad.kess'P 0 Sox 4110. Levcltnrr... N06 2110
Second (k s Slash Regestrattan "'ra,mt+e 4 4 -
Subscription rate, S1 S.2S per year Ie® aaed%were
Settior Chiron rate, SI 2.7S per year in aaed% awe
t, _S. A. and Fin, 538.00 per year he adxante
Sr. Cit. t .S.A.. and Foreign, S36.110 per :Milt Is advance
This week's Jamboree '83 picture slaws the Lucknow High School Band 29 years Baulch, Wayne Johnston, Ruth Anderson, Bill Baulch, Wlnnifred Stewart, Shirley
ago" Shown In the front from the left are, Dan Rose, Don Thompson, Ray MacKenzie, Hodgins, Morley Chin, Marilyn Kilpatrick, George Anderson, Charlene Smith,
Margaret Chln, Murray McNain, Donald Maclntyre, Joan Campbell, Don Cameron, Bruce Johnston, Mary Olin, Jim Hackett and Janet Campbell.
Jack McKim and Bob Armstrong. Back, from the left are, Gladys Chin, Joyce
editorial
i
Some farmers destroy the image of their colleagues
it seems the squeaky wheel always gets the most
attention.
Members of the Canadian Farm Survival Association took
over a farm liquidation sale near Palmerston last week,
chasing off the bank appointed auctioneer and conducting
their own auction which saw 5100,000 worth of farm
equipment sold for 519.81.
While many Canadians both urban and rural dwellers
sympathize with the problems faced by Canadian farmers,
the high interest rates, the large debt load necessary to
operate a farm, the low prices for commodities sold at the
'market place and the lack of government programs to
support farming, it is difficult to appreciate the concern for
some farmers who have deliberately over extended
themselves.
According to the reports in the news media, the Palmer-
ston farmer John Otto owes S450,000 to the Toronto
Dominion Bank and the Federal Farm Credit Corp. More
than half of that is a loan to pay the interest on the original
S200,000 loan to buy the farm, the cattle and the feed when
he started farming five years ago.
Otto's father co-signed the loan when he started fanning
and has put in about $200.000 in cash towards interest and
operating expenses and now the bank wants him to put up a
piece of property he owns with a value of about 5200,000 as
further collateral which he is not prepared to do. The bank
has a lien against the farm, the cattle and the equipment
and decided to sell.
While it is true that there should be government
programs in place to assist farmers who wish to start
farming. to prevent a farmer getting himself hopelessly in
debt to begin farming, the person who borrows such
amounts of money and places himself in such a position
where he has no equity, must bear some of the responsibil-
ity for the situation. Some day that money has to be repaid.
Banks are at fault to a degree. There are plenty of poor
advice given out several years ago when farmers borrowed
money and were told interest rates were going to come
down. instead they climbed to the lofty heights of 25 per
cent. Just about anyone could borrow any amount as
bankers became lenders instead of bankers.
But the piper calls the tune and now its time to pay.
While Otto and other farmers who have found themselves
owing exhorbitant amounts of money through mismanage-
ment, poor business practices and the curses of farming
today make the most noise and find they are supported by
farm organizations such as the Farm Survival Association,
many Canadian farmers are quietly going bankrupt, selling
out to foreign interests or going to work off the farm while
reducing their farming activities to the bare minimum.
Others are returning to the bank yet again to seek a new
refinancing arrangement. Many are farmers who have not
over extended themselves, who have used good business
sense and sound management practices in conducting their
farm business. But it still isn't enough. They are in trouble
too.
While the "squeaky wheels" are getting the attention
and giving farmers the image of poor managers who over
extend themselves at the banks and then expect they
shouldn't have to pay back the money they have borrowed.
honest, progressive and hard working farmers are losing
their right to farm. It is these farmers the farm associations
should be concerned about. While they don't make national
headlines, it is their plight which symbolizes the accurate
picture of the agricultural industry today.
Strong protest greets pornographic TV progra
Murray Cardiff, M.P. (Huron -Bruce) today released the
following text of a letter he has sent to constituents
protesting the planned showing of erotic or pornographic
material on recently licensed Pay Television channels.
"This is one of those issues that people feel very strongly
about," Cardiff said. "My mail on this issue has been
heavier than on any issue since the MacEachen budget of
1981. I'm glad to say that one hundred per cent of those who
have written to me about the Pay T.V. pornography issue
are opposed to allowing such material on any Canadian
television channel."
He added that protests against pornography on Pay T.V.
have come from all parts of the riding and are heaviest
among Church related groups.
Cardiff stated: "The reason I am releasing the text of this
letter publicly is that many who wrote to me did not include
their addresses. 1 am therefore unable to write back to them
directly. in any case, this is a community issue that deserves
to be discussed widely because it affects and concerns all of
us."
Ottawa, Februaty 9th, 1983.
Dear Friends:
During the current controversy surrounding Pay TV
programming in Canada. I have received a great deal of mail
from concerned people in Huron - Bruce and the
surrounding area, opposed to any airing of erotic or
pornographic material on licensed television. I would like to
thank you for writing and making this effort to register your
iews on a subject which concerns all of us. 1 am alco
encouraged that many wrote to the CRTC and to the
Minister of Communications, who jointly ave responsibility
for administering public policy relating to television.
I have no difficulty at all in opposing empahtically any use
of licensed television in Canada to use pornographic
material. The CRTC has issued a press release indicating
that it would like to see the television industry adopt
voluntary standards for its programming to prevent such
abuses. One reason they give for preferring this course is
that they claim not to have any mandate to prohibit material
in advance, while, after broadcast, when the harm has been
done, it is for the courts to rule on questions of obscenity
and of community"'standards. The CRTC also believes.
however, that the current judicial definition of obscenity is
J; `'nt television. My own Llie
urn to page 7.