Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Lucknow Sentinel, 1991-05-29, Page 2Page 2 L ucknuw Sentinels Wednesdays Mons 1991.. Ti ren„ _. --� r'-r'rr- r c .41 E AN OPINION? 0.1.404,44.t, eres N xpress it by sending 'a letter to the editor of the Lucknow Sentinel, It ust be signed and accompanied by a telephone numbers howl. we need to clarify any informations I in, oetturt disc reserves into ;iyht to eon letters. 1 i4 • Agrichernical iRv grOwIng: 14,01 • or GOr:art:, Rales 'Rei esenta.ti or more information *about LaddoF orttact your local :; grichemicalsupplier: •ttkaddo{s" 15 tilovistfireet fr defl k of BASF AG, BASF Canada lnc: 311he• rioultural Chemicals sr . Reserve Tho Right To admit Qusntitist•To Normal Food it N: 11 • Q Brenda 1%Ice-'l 9 #1"•. Ripley r• r � •r!w i�A � t� �►�rlm t�► �� �, M1 /�!R R.+1.1►1► �I1+SMS1r b iii �4l i With This import: SAVE 20 off ;15g. B'C+t nrette FCS :•:•'•: :::`�°�Y{:h S:r'r:�X•"v: :.tiry ' itchI aaC no' is mrom14.mm7 ,w0si!elrrIrly fr1wri.i0Fitor r1wig0g4J41 Carom this, acer.: wir 2044, 040041141404kT/7 1.0 bilk* of Tri. i,►c�rlii�arioi�,�r� 1lTe diS! Specis( Price w/Q :oUport Sr �: t Offer.Expires Sat; June 1/91 :}:• LWW/.iaW,i �riYrivliidi WrHi.•rr.imrliti KNEGI-ITEf: r;. 3 X 250 mi. Tetras Ass'tt Vaneges• - rur it • Driflks.. Case of 9 - $ x 250 mi. 6.99 Fires Sat. ,June 1/91 r�.riWYYiY:YWrii.ili'ii�LrWi...n.rwr- • VECHTEWrWI�rw�IrriY•rYl�ii'i.r � q, • itHiah;I006101004::14100,• t n es as led � t C disabi •our , W • nunthe who •q .mmsimallo.' tai maneuver a alba' tit crlateheS ow;,,found them - which : could . _i�j lu enit.' to e chi r Canada the to i f hat for persons bi it�es live, 1 p fostered by `, we can` make tealchange happen:n our a communities to hit ve the quillitYquality of yHVhtg forVersos' • with, 4isa riltiesf.` ✓, . MOTHER PARKER'S Asst. Varieties 300 g. it Q�'.ti i:• 8atile . iNECH-TEL' 1E' 500 g'jat. \ Eso tool • he 1' ' sa r .1 mote Nr�1�••+rM+.M�.�rr�r+�r'�iMrrrrirwM�Fwwru 1' mote LEAP "ular°'or'Rar 15 1 SAVE so' f H.!'You e N9i"I'A 10 IVR r s tpptrtt r as rn+r ► council.,. , ven' M nrr. a stronghold of.:Opositionto.antalgamittioncsikt ttt is , that.the study could riSidered,t04,ed with t issue of ,gantation and t,itructutingrestructuring oder-the County" s Weightedgh6r4 vote system, the outcome of the,balloting was 59 to 14 against the report. ... Awls* broke. out in the audience- of'municipal politicians aid staff at the t. .; , Many councillors looked clearly relieved‘to put an and to-. the two Cad of` heated bote that restruc- toting':. has spatted, but others warned the issue, is not dead yet; Brucel I, Moray Elston, in particular, is cone irnedd that saying:. 'to the entire .report 411I only ake. boundail and servicing, agreement* more bitterly4ought in the areaexperiencing the problems Of Wirth, like Kincardine and Port Elston went as fat as to. predict' defeat of restructuring will only . n d 'r"tht' yea:political di eulty" in Bruce. Committee chainnanikililt tileIver idii t .;rev, hispersonal opinion Ian the issue until the last minute his Vote. As chairman, bore the unt, of public 4 With this [wUENERS. . 1.0W yup i " special Price w/o Coupon.2.19 w r i Offer Expires Sat lune 1/91[ i�liiisEN 564o53$i i --Ili..:Yif1101�WYripli —,001iY�0T�iI-v-400 1,-,—,*.* -s."-40-- ARTT'�rRACk A`t"1'ACHEo R7 * Fresh 244 1(9. Each contains 3 Centret, a 3 TendetioirnEnd Chops•ip MAPLE tgAltsco g• g ;sietted Vanett es , Iva 'SY♦ .SVA, NO, I. GRAD teihatY talou 14 • hostility to the process, and noted i ttlbrief address. to councitthe many att► �-to dstudy overthe`. past tlo y ,teport beeause it would Om lest egrants to trey hamMunicipalities go•troughaural- • gatnation. "It's the big municipalities that see. benefit , it," McIver said, . echoing a sentiment that has heen colon • among opponents Of the • study. But Whet said the - county "has to gain something from -the report after .two years of frit* and .opendis. 4 ussion . He predicted that once ; temper' have cooled, : some of the Sine. mendations int" the report may fimd. their way inti POO" just as mom- mendations- from the 1975 coal study did, even though that report, was not endorsed b coeur il, Saugcen .Township was iou1s that the resitucturing. report not he sent.on• to the province because it is amid what it tuns' a °f wed, and incomplete report may be "dusted off" and implemented, But the *ports. along with- the result of thecouncil vote and Writ tett tenses from ni cipah hest, will o to the s of Mu nic Aff for. review. • • ZAP