Loading...
The Citizen, 1987-07-15, Page 4PAGE 4. THE CITIZEN, WEDNESDAY, JULY 15, 1987. Opinion Who needs heros like Ollie North? The frightening thing about living beside a super power like the United States is not seeing presidents with all their power make mistakes, but see a person like Col. Oliver North, despite his admittance of breaking the law, become a hero. That apparently is what has happened after a week of Col. North testifying to a committee of the U.S. congress investigating the Iran-Contra illegal arms deal. Col. North hasn’t denied much except that what he was doing was wrong. He termed such ideas as using the proceeds of illegal arms deals to support other illegal activities around the world by a kind of secret government as “a neat idea”. He has said that the President of the United States should be able to do just about anything hewants in the name ofU.S. foreign policy, even if the elected members of the House of Representatives and Senate have used their powers to make those activities illegal. Sowhat happens? Letters, telegrams and donations flood in. People say he should run for president. The man becomes a hero of a large portion of the right wing of American politics. The bad guys to these people are the Congressmen and the Senators (most hated Democrats) who would tie the hand of the president and prevent him from being a4 ‘ Rambo’ ’ dashing in to rescue countries he feels are in danger of falling to the communists: Nicaragua being the most visible example. What is frightening about these people is that in their blinkered view of the world that sees all problems related to communists or socialists, they fail to see that to fight communist dictatorships, they’re willing to make their own country a dictatorship. If Ollie North and his group which apparently included CIA director William Casey and Admiral John Poindexter of the National Security Council had their way, the president and his advisors would have a free hand to pursue whatever they thought was best for their country regardless of whether the people or the elected congress approved. As one committee member said there would be a virtual junta running the government’s foreign policy. What is frightening is that so many Americans seem willing to give them that power. What president as firmly commited to a moral crusade as Ronald Reagan, wouldn’t accept that support as justification for continuing to tamper in the internal affairs of countries around the world if they feel U.S. security or U.S. interests justify it? Others than Turner have long memories Speaking about party dissidents Sunday night on television federal Liberal leader John Turner said that he had a ‘‘long memory”: a veiled threat that anyone who opposed his positions would not find much opportunity for advancement if he ever became Prime Minister again. He didn’t stop to think that maybe the problem with the dissidents is that they too have long memories. Maybe Donald Johnston, David Berger and Sergio Marchi and others have memories long enough to remember when the Liberal party stood for policies nearly opposite to many of the positions, Mr. Turner now advocates: particularly involving constitutional reform as embodied in the Meech Lake accord. What Mr. Turner seems to be asking is that our elected politicians should be without conscience, should be ready to change their views instantaneously the moment the word comes down from their leader as to what he feels party policy should be. What he seems to be promoting is the same kind of situation that was witnessed in China when the government would send out the word of the latest ideologically proper policy and many people would rush to comply but in the next years or months, the government would decide on a different, often opposite policy and all those who had followed the party line before were now purged or sent to jail or to ‘‘re-education” camps. The questions Canadian voters must ask is if they want to elect a government filled with “yes-men” of the kind Mr. Turner apparently wants in his party. Do they want to elect a party that’s ready to grasp at what is the latest twist of public opinion and change all its policies rather than set firm principles and work toward them. Those Canadians who are tired of the leadership of Brian Mulroney are unlikely to turn to Mr. Turner’s wishy-washy policies as an alternative. Is it any wonder that Canadians, in desperation, seem to be turning in record numbers to the New Democratic Party which seems to stand for something? In the long run, not only must Mr. Turner have a long memory. The voters do too. Letter from the editor BYKEITH ROULSTON I’ve had a lot of occasion lately to consider what is success in this world and come to the conclusion that, as in a lot of things, our society preaches one thing and does another. The thoughts came on thinking back over 70 years of a man’s life: my father’s. After four years of battling cancer he finally lost last week. By the standards that seem to apply in the 1980’s, my father was not a success. In this yuppie world he never accumulated much afflu­ ence. He never dressed in fashion­ able clothes and wouldn’t know the “right” restaurant from the wrong. He never held positions of great power and influence. He didn’t have a driving desire to change the world. In fact, to some people he might have deserved some of those uncomplimentary names that seem to be applied these days to nice, ordinary people. Yet, if you judged people in the terms that we profess to appre­ ciate, he was a great success. He was the kind of man who put the word “gentle” in gentleman. It was a rare occurrence when one heard his voice raised in anger. I can remember, as aboy growing up on the farm, hearing him use harsh words to a stubborn piece of machinery but seldom to a human being. Probably by today’s standards he would be judged a sucker because he probably was taken advantage of more than a few times because of his gentleness and his desire to stay out of arguments. To him turning the other cheek was the answer. It was better to avoid an argument than to win by bullying. And yet this gentle man was one of the first to sign up for the army when war broke out. He said he had always known that if it came to war he would be there. It’s hard to imagine him being in the middle of the slaughter but he was there in Italy and in Holland, Belgium and France. When the war was over, how­ ever, it was over. He had done his duty. He seldom talked about it. His service medals lay in a box in the drawer in his dresser. He didn’t join the Legion to relive old times. The past was past. About the only continuing connection he kept was He went back to a quiet life and probably would have happily spent the rest of his life working on his farm if the economics of farming hadn’t forced him to seek off-farm employment. Farm life suited him. He was sociable but he liked being alone. He loved animals and he loved kids. There was something about him that attracted kids. They seemed to sense that gentleness. His grand­ children were among those who mourned him most. He was special without being a “special” person. There are mil­ lions like him and yet he was one of a kind. The big wide world won’t miss his passing. He didn’t leave an indelible mark on the course of human events, just on the lives of 5Continued on pagewhen he went to an annual reunion of those he had served with. [Published by North Huron Publishing Company Inc. ] Serving Brussels, Blyth, Auburn, Belgrave, Ethel, Londesborough, Walton and surrounding townships. Published weekly in Brussels, Ontario P.O.Box 152 P.O. Box429, Brussels, Ont. Blyth, Ont. NOG 1 HO N0M1H0 887-9114 523-4792 Subscription price: $15.00; $35.00 foreign. Advertising and news deadline: Monday 2p.m. in Brussels; 4p.m. in Blyth Editor and Publisher: Keith Roulston Advertising Manager: Janice Gibson Production and Office Manager: Jill Roulston Second Class Mail Registration No. 6968