Loading...
The Citizen, 1987-03-18, Page 4PAGE 4. THE CITIZEN, WEDNESDAY, MARCH 18, 1987. Opinion Perception becomes reality As the debate on whether or not to restore the death penalty grows in Canada, the media bears a huge responsibility for making sure the truth is presented to the public. In politics, perception becomes reality. If enough people think something is so, it becomes so. There is a perception among Canadians, for instance, that Canada has become a violent place to live. Perhaps it is that perception that has prompted 68 per cent of the people, according to an October poll, to support the return of the death penalty. Even opponents of a return of the death penalty are probably concerned about what appears, by media reports, to be an epidemic of killings of police officers. Yet Statistics Canada figuresshowthatbetween 1966and 1975, when the death penalty was still on the books, there were 38 police officers killed. In the 10 years after the death penalty was abolished in 1976, there were 37 police officers murdered. Still, too many but showing no alarming increase, especially considering there were nearly twice as many police officers out there. According to Maclean’s magazine, a survey by the University of Toronto’s Centre of Ciminology showed just how prevalent is the view of Canada as a violent place to live. Of those interviewed, 75 percent thought that at least 30 per cent of all crimes were violent. The reality shows only 5.7 per cent of crimes involve violence. The number of murders per hundred thousand population has actually dropped since the death penalty was abolished (though it has risen significantly since the early 1960’s when the last person was hanged in Canada). Flooded with scenes of seedy cities filled with violence on imported American TV shows, bombarded with news items from all around an ever-shrinking world in full, bloody colour on television news, people are apt to be frightened into thinking drastic action must be taken to save civilization: even if it means bringing back an uncivilized act like execution. A whiff of power Funny things happen to political parties when they sense they have a chance at political power. Expediency is apt to cloud better judgement. Such seems to be the case of the New Democratic Party with its move at its national convention this past weekend to embrace special status for Quebec. The NDP, if it came to power, promised Quebec it would support the province’s right to opt out of federal programs and get full financial compensation; and to give the province a veto on all constitutional changes affecting French language and culture in Quebec. This kind of debate on special status for Quebec goes back a quarter of a century now. Battles have been fought inside and outside the province over it. Pierre Trudeau led his long campaign to make Quebecers feel they needn’t retreat into fortress Quebec, surrounded by walls to protect their language and culture but to look beyond Quebec’s border to feel comfortable doing business anywhere in Canada. The defeat of the referendum for Quebec sovereignty proved a watershed for the province. While political energy that had been driving the province for two decades ebbed, confident new Quebecers started doing exactly what Pierre Trudeau had hoped, pushing outside the province into therest of Canada and the U.S. expanding in business and taking control of their own lives. It is ironic, then, that at this point in time all three political parties should be embracing some sort of special status for Quebec. A confident new Quebec seems less in need of protection now than ever in its history. Bouyed by polls that show them second in Quebec and second across the country, the New Democrats see themselves realistically as the next official opposition or even the next government. The key to national power has always been Quebec and the NDP wants to attract all the supporters of the provincial Parti Quebecois. The NDP, which stands for equality on so many issues, is ready to institutionalize inequality among the provinces to court votes in Quebec. Is this a sign that the party that always sounds self-righteous, is willing to compromise its other principals for a chance at the brass ring of power? A sign of the times In the 1970's an eastern Ontario back-to-the-lander left over from the 1960’sborrowedsome money and put out a little magazine about the pleasures of self-sufficiency. The magazine took off and soon became the seventh largest circulation magazine in the country, not by appealing to the remnants of the back-to-the-land movement but to the dreams of rich young urbanites who could see themselves as gentlemen farmers, even in the backyard of their townhouses, fhe magazine was so successful it expanded into the U.S. Last week James Lawrence sold his publishing empire in the little Ontario town of East Camden to a large Montreal media conglomerate. Symbolic of our times, isn’t it. 'Blasted groundhog - setting the alarm so early...' Mabel’s Grill There are people who will tell you that the important decisions in town are made down at the town hall. People in the know, however know that the real debates, the real wisdom reside down at Mabel s Grill where the greatest minds in the town [if not in the country] gather for morning coffee break, otherwise known as the Round Table Debating and Fili­ bustering Society. Since not just everyone can partake of these deliberations we will report the activities from time to time. MONDAY: How could the televi­ sion networks ever even think of running condom ads that might be construed as encouraging casual sex, Julia Flint was saying. Everybody knows the networks only run nice wholesome program­ ming, encouraging family values like fidelity and chastity: shows like Falconcrest and Days of Our Lives and Miami Vice. Shame on those public health people who dared to suggest telling people if they were going to mess around they should use protection. TUESDAY: Billie Bean was asking Councillor Ward Black how much taxes are likely to go up now that it’s the time of year for hatching new things like baby chicks and town budgets. Ward admitted the taxes are going to be going up again which led to the usual comments aboutthe council not knowing what it was doing. Ward suggested they should be lucky at least they didn’t live in Wiarton where spending got so out of hand the council had to turn their affairs over to the province. “And what chance do they have now, ” he said. “If they can’t balance their own budget, how do they hope Liberals will balance it.” WEDNESDAY: Whatever hap­ pened to free enterprise, Billie Bean wondered. He’d been read­ ing in the paper where some senior citizens in B.C. had been arrested for trying to add to their income. “ I mean they could have been on welfare or something but instead they were trying to look after themselves growing crops. I mean, why the big fuss just because the crop they were growing was $90,000 worth of marijuana.’’ THURSDAY: Hank Stokes said that even this nice winter we’ve had has been a problem for farmers around here. Out west there was a farmer who was in trouble with the bank and he and 30 friends bulldozed a wall of snow across the driveway to keep the banker out. “Wouldn’t you know it,’’ said Hank, “just when all the darned snow we get around here could finally have been put to use, we don’t get any.” _______ FRIDAY: Tim O’Grady was taking a ribbing this morning about how much lawyers make but he fought back with the item in the paper about the fact judges make too little and they should be paid more. “Who wrote that report, a lawyer?” Billie wondered. Ward Black broke in with the news about the insurance official that said the real way to cut the costs of car insurance isn’t so much cutting down the number of accidents, but cutting down the number of lawyers. If there weren’t so many lawyers, he said, insurance costs could be cut drastically. “Yeh,’’ said Billie “and if there weren’t so many lawyers there wouldn’t be so many people who could afford those big expensive cars that cost a bundle to get fixed if they’re in an accident. We could save even more then.” [Published by North Huron Publishing Company Inc. ] Serving Brussels, Blyth, Auburn, Belgrave, Ethel, Londesborough, Walton and surrounding townships. Publishedweekiyin Brussels, Ontario P.O. Box 152 P.O. Box 429, Brussels, Ont. Blyth, Ont. NOG 1 HO N0M1H0 887-9114 523-4792 Subscription price: $15.00; $35.00 foreign. Advertising and news deadline: Monday 2p.m. in Brussels; 4p.m. In Blyth Editor and Publisher: Keith Roulston Advertising Manager: Beverley A. Brown Production and Office Manager: Jill Roulston Second Class Mail Registration No. 6968