HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Citizen, 1988-05-03, Page 5THE CITIZEN, WEDNESDAY, MAY 3, 1988. PAGE 5.
County 4-H dubs in trouble
You've got to listen to us, leaders say
It was evident from a stormy
meeting held in Clinton April 27
that many 4-H clubs in Huron
County are in deep trouble, with
problems that can only be solved if
the people at the top of the
organization start listening to
those at the bottom.
The meeting was called by the
Clinton office of the Ministry of
Agriculture and Food to give local
4-H leaders, parents and senior
club members a chance to discuss
the 4-H Review Committee’s
preliminary Report just out, but
most of the evening was spent in
blasting the inequities of the
program as seen by those who
deliver it.
Jack Hagarty, director of
OMAF’s Rural Organizations Ser
vices (ROS) branch came under
heavy fire for everything from the
make-up of the Review Committee
to the lack of enthusiasm of county
ROS staff, and it was evident that
he was shaken by the accusations.
It was equally evident that
nobody at the top had ever
bothered to listen to those at the
bottom before, an attitude which a
number of the 2(5 or so Club leaders
from Huron and Bruce Counties
present say has led to the current
level of frustration in the organiza
tion, as well as being a contributing
factor in the resignations of some of
the county’s top leaders and
senior members.
And although a number of those
present indicated that the pro
blems with 4-H are more severe in
Huron County than in most other
midwestern Ontario counties, oth
ers, like 4-H Club leader Lila
Rintoulof RR2, Lucknow, said that
if Mr. Hagarty goes to other
counties, he’d “hear worse.”
By far the major problem with
the organization as it currently
exists, accordingtothoseatthe
Clinton meeting, is that the
OMAF’s ROS staff is seen to be
almost totally uninvolved with the
4-H clubs in their areas, despite the
fact that close to 50 per cent of their
time is to be devoted to 4-H,
according to Mr. Hagarty. The
problem, said several leaders, is
thAttheROS positions inOMAF
ar? seen as “low man on the totem
pole,” stepping stones to a better
job, and as a result, they say, few
staffers “neither know nor care”
what’s happening to the 4-H clubs
in their charge.
“Where do they get these
people?,” Mrs. Rintoul said. “If
they have no contact with 4-H kids
or leaders, how can they act as the
liason between us and (the mini
stry)?”
(Their attitude) really pisses me
off," added Jim Hallahan of RR 3,
Blyth, former leader of the Hallrice
4-H Dairy Calf Club in north Huron
and one of those responsible for
building the club up to be one of the
largest and mostenthusiastic dairy
4-H Club leaders, past leaders, parents, senior club members and other concerned individuals had the
chance to voice their frustration with the current state of 4-H Clubs in Huron County when they met with
senior provincial staff in Clinton last week. Their message to the top staffer was loud and clear: you’ve got
to start listening to us. From left, Glen McNeil, Bob McNeil, Bevan Shapton, Jim Hallahan, Ken Ramsey,
Shirley Ramsey and Ruth Marcou, Regional Manager, Western Region Rural Organization Services.
clubs in the province.
“I think they could put a little
more effort into their jobs by
getting out and meeting the kids,
by participating in all the 4-H
events instead of just picking and
choosing. I think maybe that’s the
problem - they ’ re just not commun
icating with the kids or the
leaders,” he added.
The prevalent attitude at the
meeting was that there had not
been a good 4-H co-ordinator in
Huron County for the past five
years, since former co-ordinator
Len McGregor was replaced when
the ROS branch was put in place by
the ministry, co-inciding with the
amalgamation of the Agriculture
and Homemaking 4-H Clubs in
1983. Since that time, leaders say,
each new rural organization spe
cialist has not stayed long enough
to get to know what is happening
within the 4-H organization. And
even if they did, the leaders
agreed, none has had enough time
nor enthusiasm to do anything to
correct the cancer within.
Neither Jane Muegge nor Nick
Geleynse, the current ROS staffers
attached to the Clinton OMAF
office, were present at the meet
ing, an indication, said resigned
4-H Sheep Club leader Harriet
Boon of RR 2, Bluevale, that the
OMAFstaffknew thatwas going to
come out at the meeting. It was
likely, she told The Citizen, thatthe
Clinton office felt the leaders
would be more likely to speak their
minds if the local organization
specialists were not in attendance.
Several leaders questioned why
the county 4-H co-ordinators had to
be university graduates “who have
never had a hand on a bale of hay, ’ ’
rather than some of the county’s
own diploma students from Cen
tralia or Ridgetown, that many felt
were more likely to have come up
through the ranks of 4-H them
selves, or even some of the
county’s top 4-H leaders, most of
whom are passionately committed
to the organization. But Mr.
Hagarty said that under OMAF’s
present organization this would be
impossible, since the ministry
could only hire personnel with
degrees for ROS positions.
ROS staff were also blamed for
shifting more and more of the
responsibilities of their jobs over
on to club leaders, such as the
responsibility for marking mem
bers’ project books, ashasbeen
asked of leaders in the past two
years. Neither the kids nor the
leaders like this method, because
manykidshaveaparentastheir
club leader, which could lead to
marking a member’s project too
hard or too easy, according to the
parent. It also takes too much time
out of the volunteer leader’s
already crowded schedule, which
is a major reason so many
committed leaders have quit over
the past couple of years, they say.
“If I’m going to have to do the
(ROS’s) work, I want part of their
pay,” Jim Hallahan said.
But the largest issue at stake,
according to a majority of those
present, who went on record with a
show of hands in the matter, is the
matter of member’s age in 4-H
clubs, now set at 12 to 21. Most feel
that the age should be lowered to
accept kids as young as 11, or even
10, as full-fledged 4-H members,
oratleastallow a return to the days
of a few years back when a category
called Pre-4-H, for 11-year-olds,
was permitted.
Several leaders, most notably
those associated with the large
Hallrice Club, said that they had
regularly “operated outside the
law’ ’ by permittingyounger kids to
take part in all Club activities, and
that the younger kids had in most
cases done as well as the older
“legal” members, and in many
cases had gone on to become the
top members of their own clubs and
to do well at county and regional
competitions.
In response, Mr. Hagarty said
that since experience had shown
that most members stay in their
4-H clubs for just under three
years, with the average member’s
age at just over 14, OMAF felt that
the ages 12-21 were the most
productive years for a younger
person to be in the organization.
But several leaders violently
disagreed, pointing out that if the
average tenure is less than three
years, there must be something
wrong with the organization’s
image in the first place, something
that would have to be changed.
“Kidsain’tstupidany more, like
we were,” said Jim Hallahan,
whose family has been associated
with the movement in Huron
County for more than 50 years.
One of the major reasons that
kids leave 4-H now, said 4-H Swine
Club leader Ron Shelley of RR 2,
Gorrie, is that the Club work is no
longer any fun for kids - much of it is
too complicated for the age levels
to which it is directed, and the
projects are now so involved that in
order to cover the material within
thespecified time, there is noroom
left in meetings for fun or social
times, and this is very wrong.
His daughter, Sandra Shelley, a
seniorClub memberand Huron
County’s 1987 Champion All
round Showman, agrees.
“I’maRidgetowngraduate, and
even lean’t understand some of the
stuff that’s in there. The material is
just too heavy for lots of kids,
especially first-year kids. If some
of the leaders can’t understand it,
how are the kids supposed to?”
Leaders from the dairy, beef,
sheep and poultry club agreed: 4-H
has to be fun, they said, not just an
extension of school.
Going over the 56-page draft of
the 4-H Review Committee’s
Interim Report item by item, the
leaders were constantly diverted
as they expressed further frustra
tion with such things as the choice
ofpeople surveyed to provide input
into the report and the inequalities
which exist between the current
agricultural (or “competitive”)
4-H programs and the new “life
style” programs. However, the
thing that caused almost as much
Continued on page 20
The International
Scene
Peace is not likely
to break out
in Afghanistan
BY RAYMOND CANON
Afghanistan is one of those
countries that most of us have read
about but have never visited. 1
must confess that lama member of
that group; much as I would like to
have a look at the place, I have had
to restrict my interest to reading
about it and trying to understand
what is going on. At times it is not
easy and even the Russians must
wonder just what it was that made
them get mixed up in the place.
A little bit of background
material is in order. Afghanistan is
one of those countries which
border on anarchy. When the
British were there in the 19th
century, they found it extremely
hard to keep under control. They
never really did; it was easier to cut
one’s losses and get out which they
proceeded to do. Since that time
there has been very little in the way
of law and order. Kabul might be
the capital but frequently what
went on outside of Kabul had very
little to do with the direction any
government wanted to take.
The country is quite mountain
ous and even getting there, short of
flying in, is something of a chore.
The population is for the most part
Moslem but not Arab, a character
istic that it shares with Pakistan
and Indonesia. Of late the same
fundamentalism which has hit Iran
also made its presence felt in
Afghanistan and it was this fact as
much as anything that made the
Kremlin decide it was a good time
to step in and make sure that,
whatever the religious proclivities
of the Afghan government was, it
was friendly to Moscow. There are,
after all, a goodly number of
Moslems living right across the
border in the Soviet Union and
Moscow did not want this funda
mentalism flowing into the Soviet
Union and making things even
more difficult than they currently
are.
Hence the invasion of Afghani
stan by the Soviet Union in 1976
and the installation of a commun
ist-oriented government in Kabul.
Doing that was one thing, getting
the rest of the country to follow suit
was another and in no time at all,
the Russian forces, numbering
well over 100,000 found them
selves in somewhat the same
situation as did the Americans in
Vietnam. There was simply noway
thata limited engagementcould be
turned into a victory. The Ameri
cans eventually learned that there
was a great deal of wisdom in
cutting their losses in Vietnam and
going home, regardless ofwhat the
rest of the world thought of it. Now
it is the turn of the Russians. They
have been no more successful than
the Americans and the negotia
tions which have just been held
were concentrated as much as
anything on the ways in which
Moscow could withdraw with as
little a loss of face as possible.
I wish that I could saythatthe
departure of the Russians which
will start to take place this spring
will result in peace and friendship
in Afghanistan. Unfortunately, as I
have indicated above, anarchy
seems to be a way of life at times in
thatcountry and there is, there
fore, the distinct possibility that
the various factions which have
been carrying on against the
invading Russians, will now find it
next to impossible to work together
for the good of the country. We
should be under no illusions about
that since we experienced some
what the same thing at the close of
World War II. During the way we
were taught to believe that the
Russians were loyal allies of the
Canadians in the fight against
Hitler and so they were. However,
the war was hardly over when it
became quite obvious that, what
ever had united us during the war,
was patently absent from 1945 on.
We started being suspicious of the
Russians’ intentions and they of us
until one would never know that we
had been so close only a few years
ago. Stalin became almost as big a
menace as Hitler and it is only now
that we are seeing what appears to
be a real thaw in relations between
the Russian and the Western
World.
Soitis with Afghanistan. The
Russians have agreed to leave;
they will by no stretch of the
imagination want to see a govern
ment which is hostile to them.
What we may, unfortunately, see
is an Afghan government that
cannot maintain any degree of
unity because of its own inherent
hostility.