Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Citizen, 2007-10-25, Page 5THE CITIZEN, THURSDAY, OCTOBER 25, 2007. PAGE 5. Bonnie Gropp TThhee sshhoorrtt ooff iitt Battle of the bugs Acouple of years ago I suffered – briefly – from a condition called Benign Paroxysmal Position Vertigo – BPPV for short. Dizzy spells, to put it even shorter. If I got up too fast or turned my head too sharply or bent over too quickly to pick something off the floor, my internal gyroscope went into overdrive and I lurched about like Ozzie Osbourne on New Year’s Eve. You don’t get BPPV from bad dietary practices, using street drugs or hanging out at the Willie Pickton pig farm. BPPV is an equal opportunity bushwhacker that nails vicars and villains alike. Anyone can get it, at any age, at any time. An attack comes when microscopic grains of calcium crystals floating about in your inner ear brush against tiny hairs therein. This sends signals to your brain that you are falling down, or veering left or right. Your brain attempts to get your body to compensate in 11 different directions all at once and, hey presto, you feel like you are going through the spin cycle in some galactic Maytag. Happily, there is a procedure called the Epley Maneuver. It’s a relatively simple manipulation of the head that any qualified ear, nose and throat specialist is trained to perform. Basically, Doctor ENT takes your noggin and gives it a vigorous spin. The idea is to shake up those calcium crystals in your ear and get them to settle down where they’re supposed to be, well away from the hairs. Does it work? An astonishing 85 per cent of the time – providing you actually are suffering from BPPV. If your vertigo is caused by something else (and there are several possibilities) then the Epley Maneuver won’t help. My vertigo was cured in one visit and I wrote a magazine article about it. End of story. Not. I get an e-mail from one Muriel Kaufman. She is a spokeswoman for a group called BADD which stands for Balance and Dizziness Disorders Society. As a former sufferer, she wants to know, would I consider coming to town and speaking to her group? Well, sure. Public speaking is what I do for a living. I e-mail her back with details of my speaking fee, my expenses expectations and my availability. I get another e-mail. You don’t understand, writes Muriel. We are a non-profit organization. We don’t even have an executive. Would I come and speak for free? Hell, no. I’m a professional. I don’t give away my services. Would you ask a surgeon to do a free appendectomy? A lawyer to defend you in court, gratis? You don’t understand, Muriel e-mails back. She makes many passionate arguments but what it boils down to is, what I don’t understand is that she is Muriel Kaufman and she will not be denied. When I arrive to deliver my (free) speech at St. Paul’s Church in Vancouver, the auditorium is not only sold out, there are people sitting in the aisles and a conga line of latecomers trailing out the door. This is entirely Muriel Kaufman’s doing. She has dredged up every soul who ever suffered from vertigo in the entire British Columbia lower mainland and they are all here tonight. And as almost always happens when I abandon my narrow preconceptions and go with the flow, I learn amazing things and hear incredible tales. I hear one sufferer tell how her doctor pooh- poohed the Epley Maneuver. “It’s a hoax,” he assured her. I hear of another vertigo victim who spent 10 years –10 years – as a prisoner inside her own house, terrified to face the world for fear she would fall on her face. After a decade of self-exile, she went into the office of an ear, nose and throat specialist in a wheelchair. And walked out on her own two feet. I hear stories infinitely more interesting – and harrowing – than my frail tale, but incredibly, my vertigo story – thanks entirely to Muriel Kaufman – continues to snowball across the nation. So far, I have been interviewed by two Vancouver newspapers, CKNW radio, the Edmonton Journal and the Calgary Sun. I have yet to return calls to the Toronto Star, the Montreal Gazette and CBC radio’s national radio show, The Current. I’ve got e-mails, cards and letters from BPPV sufferers from Joe Batt’s Arm to Buffalo to Baffin Bay. I’ve written books that didn’t get one-tenth this attention. Point of the story? A metaphorical bouquet of roses to the Muriel Kaufmans of the world who Get Things Done and Don’t Take No For an Answer. Muriel’s a volunteer and like all volunteers she gives her time and her energy and her cunning, all for free. Volunteers – bless ‘em – are the backbone and the lifeblood of our communities. Moral number two: count your blessings. If you got out of bed this morning and didn’t fall flat on your keister or do a hundred-and-eighty-degree face plant into the wall, consider yourself lucky. Award yourself an extra scoop of corn flakes. Arthur Black Tory struggles to hold job They’re not the first to be here. Others have come before to disrupt the calm and security. They have arrived in numbers, in a variety of forms. They have repulsed, repelled, outsmarted and in some cases terrorized. I long ago learned that living in an older house means you often find yourself sharing your haven with unwelcome intruders. As a young married almost 30 years ago, we came to our new home with plans for remodelling and revitalizing. But, we discovered that another little project awaited us. Having sat vacant for a few years before we purchased it, the house had become sanctuary for some unpleasant squatters. Over the course of the next several months we battled against and defeated an army of mice, trapping 25 before our work was done. Next was my close-up introduction to their flying cousins, who periodically managed to distress our household with a late-night arrival. This particular war was waged sporadically until a few years ago. Then, my husband finally managed to find where the odd one had strayed in, and plugged the hole. Unfortunately, it seems he had actually locked a few of them in. As a result their nocturnal invasions upset my life for quite a while until we (and trust me I use that in a strictly editorial sense) caught them all. The daytime version of flying critters also made a brief appearance, when a starling caught in an old chimney broke its way through a bedroom wall to bid me good day early one Sunday morning. Yes, the nooks and crannies of older homes definitely serve nature well. And while we have (crossing my fingers on this one) apparently solved the problem of mammals and birds, the bug world is another story. Like the furry and feathered, the creepy and crawly have made themselves at home in the Gropp residence over the years. A wasp’s nest in the attic brought those nasty creatures into our living space. Also, it’s no surprise that big, fat flies have clustered in windows. These were usurped two springs ago by ladybugs. Yet, with swatter and vacuum I have claimed at least some victory over the bug world. And I have little doubt that will change. However, I have always known my enemy before, and this is what brings me to the reason for this column. A new bug has come to live with me, a repugnantly beautiful creature, that simultaneously fascinates me and creeps me out. I discovered it last summer hanging around the fringes of the house. Now it has moved right in and it would be helpful to know exactly what I’m dealing with. My internet research to this point has led me to believe it’s a boxelder beetle, though the pictures are a little misleading. The new Gropp resident has red-orange markings on its back, or perhaps the wings. A slow, easy-going little crawler, it surprised me one day when it took off flying. The back is a black-grey in colour, with an almost diamond shape. The antennae are quite obvious. Without proper identification I don’t know what I’m in for, whether this pest will simply be an annoyance or if it can in some way be harmful to person or home. I suspect neither, but it would be good to know that my walls aren’t being eaten away from around me. So if anyone can offer some suggestion, feel free to bug me with any information you might have. I must be armed with all the data possible to prepare for battle. Other Views Of vertigo, vanity and volunteers Defeated Progressive Conservative leader John Tory is receiving a lot of encouragement from many quarters as he tries to hold on to his job, but he will have trouble persuading his own party to persevere with him. The Conservative leader lost the election and riding where he ran, to Premier Dalton McGuinty’s Liberals, but has said he wants to continue and will unless the party rejects him. Tory, who lost particularly because he promised to fund private faith-based schools, which offended many and became the biggest blunder in an election in memory, said he is not afraid to face critics in his party and rivals for his job, but will do what is in its best interests. The Conservative party’s president has said it needs time to assess the results, but there is a huge goodwill in it for Tory, because of his work as leader since 2004. Tory is being described by many in and outside his party as hardworking, likeable, a good TV debater and public-spirited, because he gave up a highly paid job running a cable TV company for the risks of elected politics. He also is admired for trying to bring much needed civility to politics by urging members of the legislature to be less strident and by leading somewhat by example. Former Liberal premier David Peterson said Tory is civic-minded and should remain in politics. The Toronto Star, which supported the Liberals, said the Conservative leader has shown he is decent and compassionate and cares for the vulnerable. The newspaper added Tory has much to offer, can learn from his mistakes, deserves a second chance and it would be a mistake for the Conservatives to push him out. The Globe and Mail concluded Tory’s loss may make him stronger and there is no reason to believe he cannot still be a successful politician and the Conservatives should not act precipitously. One sympathizer has established a website to collect support and pointed out McGuinty and former Conservative premier Mike Harris each were defeated when leading parties in an election before they won. All this is heady stuff and some Conservatives may be tempted to tough it out for a while under Tory. But leaders traditionally are eulogized even by enemies when they retire or no longer seem threats. The newspapers also are fair-weather friends. Before the vote, the Globe said a leader has to produce followers and Tory failed utterly. The Star felt Tory had questionable leadership skills and lacked credibility in managing finances. If Tory were to stay and lead in the next election, critics would remind he promised to fund faith-based schools in 2007 and The Star would be the first to mention it. The reality is Tory as leader was able to bring the Conservatives only 31.6 per cent of the vote, less even than his predecessor, premier Ernie Eves, who took over the party when there was so much hostility toward it he had no hope of winning. While McGuinty and Harris led and lost in elections, each managed to win his seat in the legislature as a platform for standing up to government. Tory has no seat, because the Conservatives opened up one for him in a safe, partly rural area after he won leadership. He gave it up to run this time in Toronto, trying to show his party could win in the province’s biggest city. The Conservatives would look somewhat undemocratic, and even a joke, if they had another of their MPPs step down to open up a safe seat twice for the same leader in four years. They might not even be able to persuade another MPP to step down and have no power to force one. Tory, as a result of his promise to fund faith- based schools, also has the heaviest baggage of an opposition leader in memory. The Conservatives are more likely to want to win next time than help a well-liked but unsuccessful leader rehabilitate himself. Eric Dowd FFrroomm QQuueeeenn’’ss PPaarrkk