Loading...
The Brussels Post, 1976-12-29, Page 3! You list. or this tdition is the ear in hould s Eve f you 5 One' *Ind and d our Is on tithe Styr Mink .411=111 11102iNI Ontario Legislative Assembly Select Committee on Highway Transportation of Goods The Committee presented to the Legislature an interim report dated September 30th, 1976, which dealt with certain aspects of the trans- portation of good8 on Ontario highways. in preparation for its final report; due to be tabled February 28th, 1977, the Committee is inviting WRITTEN submissions from interested individuals and groups. These should be re- ceived at the ConiMittee offiCe not later than Monday, January 10th, 1977 Select Committee on Highway Transportation' of Goods f3rn 440, Main Parliament Queep's Park Toronto M7A 1A2 Bud Gregory; M.P.P. Chairman of thci Committee David Callfas Clerk of the Committee 416.965-1060 ;Parker Plumbing 81 Heating: 887-6079 Give her a time-saving gift, at a Money-saving price. Energy Saver DISHWASHER by MODERN MAID or Simplicity 299. portable Suggested Retail Price $469. FREE DELIVERY FREE SET UP FULL YEAR WARRANTY FULL 2 YEAR PART WARRANTY NO CHARGE FOR COLOUR What lady wouldn't love this time saver? And what man wouldn't love the savings! The Modern Maid dishwasher features: • 2 power spray arms • rinse and hold • wash and hold • natural dry • normal wash with pot and pan cycle • full cycle • push button 6 cycle • built in or portable models • cutting board top • Harvest Gold or White Come to Merwood C. Smith Limited for the largest dis- play of refrigerators, ranges, dishwashers, washers and dryers, televisions, stereos and much more in Midwest- ern Ontario. By manufacturers such as General Electric., Simplicity, Findlay, Norge, Gibson, Gilson, Moffat, Leo- nard, Quasar, Philips, Sharp and many more! MerwoodC .Smfthilid HH4q. 23 S., „..; 'ft 61113enriLr000ndopet n .-, FFi ilidi,do 14 Foil g i X Unnisi M. C. Wth , , ... 1 . 1 s. RR 2 LIStaiOt Ontario tel. 20 ,3810 Store Hours: Open daily Monday film Friday 9 is.m. to 9 pan.; Saturdays till 5 p.m. said that it "must be emphasized that some of the amounts shown for "Sources of Funds" for 1977 are estimates only." • "The Ministry do not normally advise us of our regular subsidy allocation until early in January. The actual amount of the 1976 surplus (estimated at $71,000) will not be known until the County audit is completed in mid-January." WEEKLY SALE BRUSSELS STOCKYARDS LTD. EVERY FRIDAY At 12 Noon Phone 887-6461 . Brussels Ont. THE -BRUSSELS .POST DECEMBER 28,, 1976 county road rebate .causes. argument Goderich Township Reeve Gerry Ginn vigerously voiced his disapproval of the so-called system of returning money to urban municipalities from the County Roads budget of 45 per cent of their contribution. Reeve Ginn told council at its Friday meeting that he objected to the "underhanded method under which the rebates are handled." "The system," he said, September 29 LOUDER — That's what Brussels council hopes the village's fire siren will be, now that it's located on a tower on top of ' the, municipal building. (Photo by Langlois) Calf cheques are coming William Newman, Minister of Agriculture for Ontario has announced that the Beef Calf Incorrie Stabilization payment would be $63.42 per cow enrolled, less a $8,00 premium, for a net of $58.42 per cow enrolled. The average calculated calf price for Ontario was $33.42, and With the stabilized price of $50.00 this leaves a differential of $16.58. Payment is On the basis of 16.58 it 450 lb. calf k 85% Calving rate. This works out to $63.42 per cow enrolled, less the $5.00 premium: Cheques are being written and PayMent can be expected by yeaf end according. Stafiley .1, Paquette,, A§soeiate AgrictittUral 'Representative for Huron. County, "makes the county apportionment by-law a shambles." Reeve Ginn said he would not oppose the rebates at this time but that he wanted everyone to know who gets them. He said Goderich was very vocal in pointing out that it paid 14.4 per cent of the apportionment but they forgot to mention that after the rebates that contribution was actually dropped to 11.8 per cent. Goderich Reeve Stan Profit .told Mr. Ginn that the town last year paid $149,555 toward the County Road budget and only got back .$67,299. "I can not see any objection to the towns getting this rebate," Mr. Profit said. "in the end .the urban municipalities still pay too much toward roads in the County." Rising to respond, Mr. Ginn said he had "expected an answer like that." "Goderich Township does not get a rebate from the Library budget because we have no libary in the township,"Ginn pointed out asking why Goderich should get a rebate just because there were no county roads inside that municipality. The Goderich. Township ,Reeve also charged that the County Development budget provides no rebate to the township even though most of the promotions it handles benefited the Town of Goderich. "Why do we provide rebates on road budgets alone?", he asked. "Why is it any different than any other committee?" County Engineer Jim Britnell told the meeting that the system under which rebates are granted is actually set out as a Provincial statute in the Highways Improvement Act. That• Act states that the County must return to the urban municipalities a minimum of 25 per cent and up to a maximum of 50 .per cent but not exceeding the amount any urban municipality actually spent on roads within its boundaries in a given year. The agreement in Huron happens to have been set at 45 per cent at some time in the past he said. Mr. Britnell explained that in some Counties this problem was avoided (or the act was circumvented) by the urban areas not bothering to actually apply for the rebate. Stanley Township Reeve Anson McKinley said the "idea of a separate road rate is archaic, but it is in the 'provincial statutues." The act, he said, should be amended. "I hope councils will work in future toward the elimination of this system," he added. The question of rebates came up when council was asked to pass an estimated road budget for 1977. Following the debate, the motion was passed with only Mr. Ginn voting in opposition. The Road Committee had recommended approval of a raod budget totalling $2,832,000, up about 12.7 per cent from last year's total budget of $2,513,000. Fixed costs for such items as roadside maintenance, hard surface maintainence, gravel surface maintainence, winter control, safety devices and culvert maintainence totalled $1,014,000 as "compared to $949,000 last year. A total of $880,000 has been set. aside in the 1977 budget for road construction and paving as compared to last years expenditures of $813,000. Road number 30 westward for 2.5 miles for the village of Clifford will be Tailed at a cost of $150,000. ' Road number one, from Carlow south for 4.0 miles will be paved at , a cost of $250,000. . Road number eight from Clinton to Summerhill at a cost of $120,000 and Road number six from Highway four for 9.3 miles will be paved at a cost of $280,000. Anot her $40,000 will be spent on 'miscellaneous construction and $10,000 for the clean up of projects left over from 1976. Pre-engineering and the purchase of land in 1977 is estimated to cost $20,000 and $10,000 has been set aside for an update on the needs study. Another $85,000 has been set aside as Huron's share of ,cost of construction of boundary bridges, $40,000 for drainage assessments and $20,000 to cover stock balance and machinery debit. In the report submitted Road Committee chairman Joe Kerr