Loading...
The Brussels Post, 1979-02-07, Page 2wormairmammumumil BRUISE LS ONTARIO WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 7, 1979 Serving Brussels and the surrounding community. Published each Wednesday afternoon at Brussels, Ontario By McLean Bros. Publishers Limited Evelyn Kennedy - Editor Pat Langlois - Advertising Member Canadian Community Newspaper Association and Ontario Weekly Newspaper Association eNA Subscriptions (in advance) Canada $9.00 a Year. Others $17.00 a Year. Single Copies 20 cents each. Brussels Post 3 BEGINNERS WINNERS—These youngsters won in the Beginners class at the figure skating competitions held in Brussels on Thursday night. In the front row from left are: Kevin Alcock, Carla Johnston, Krista Keffer, and Julie Bromley. In the second row from left are: sharie Jacklin, Kelly Krauter and Jason Koetsier. In the back row from left are:, Dana Stephenson, Margaret Jarvis, Bob Veitch and Pat Cowan. These youngsters range in age from 3-6 years. (Brussels Post Photo) A shame No more teen dances. It would be a shame for the Brussels, Morris and Grey Community Centre to have to cut off dances for all teenagers because of an unfortunate act of a foolish person. When we see how much money has been raised to build the arena from our community, it's a shame to see vandalism in a building that really belongs to all of us. Residents and organizations in Brussels have worked hard to see their dream of a new arena come to fruition and now when that dream is almost complete a° part of it is destroyed. The arena is here for all community residents to enjoy various activities and if any of those activities have be cut off because of one foolish act then there's not much point in having an arena. The Brussels, Morris and Grey Community Centre needs your support. Help it with your donations. But more important let's close ranks against vandalism at the arena. Senseless damage at our new community centre could destroy more than a wall. To the editor: Wants -train photos I am doing research for a book on CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAYS into the Grey-Bruce-Huron area from the Toronto, Hamilton and London area. I would like to ask your assistance and that of your readers in locating old post cards and photos of stations, locomotive servicing facilities, bridges, construction scenes, etc. along with steam and diesel freight, paSsenger, mixed, and snow plow operations over the years. I am particularly looking for photos of: 1. The Rotary snowplow (snowblower) and of her views of plows used to open area To the editor: wants I have been a grader —snowplow operator for over 15 years and have enjoyed my work. After reading the statements of council in Jan. 31, 1979 edition of the paper, I am compelled to explain the true facts. In the first place the rate of inflation is 8.8percent. We asked for .50c an hour raise which is a little less than 8.7 percent, as reported. We get no overtime pay after a 45 hour week, such as tithe and a half which is the going rate set by a lot of other townships;no matter how many hours we have to plow. Nothing extra for working on Sundays, or statutory holidays, which We are entitled to be paid for anyway. All we were asking was a decent Wage. Ross Proctor expressed concern about the atmosphere in which the wages were settled, As tar as I know it was council hat ' created any atmosphere. These irrespcinsible statements were made behind Our backs., At the January Meeting we all decided to leave negotiations on wages until the February meeting, to get more information on other townships. When we were called into the February Meeting, Reeve Elstoh said a motion had raillines in 1947. 2. Early self propelled "unit cars" used to Southampton in late 1920's and for express service to Owen Sound in 1960. 3. Pre CNR operations, harbour and ship views, and employees. Old timetables, posters, etc would also be appreciated. If you have information that I could borrow on the above subjects please contact: Peter Bowers, Compartment 16 R.R.4, Tara, Ont NOH2NO • • opinions been made to give us the .50c an hour raise we asked for, but to negotiate wages in September 1979. When asked why, we got a "politicians" answer. We agreed and so far as I know that was it. There must have been a change of heart after we left. Deputy Reeve Tom Miller must have blocked up the barrel and pulled the plug when they set their wages. In place of setting an example, as Bob Grasby suggested by taking a cut in wages one of these times, they uped the councillors salaries by over 9 percent. For special meetings the *Reeve jumped 33 1/3 percent, the Deputy Reeve 25 percent and the councillors 50 percent. Ross Proctor suggested they tender fora snow plow operators. Well it 's a good thing there was a good experienced operator willing to come back and take over when the going got rough from the last tender job. I feel the council was biased in its attitude toward us, and would welcome any ratepayers opinion, whether negative or' positive. Your grader-snow plow operator. James Casemore RR 5Wingham In the hard, cruel, cynical world Of the 1970's, I'm a hopeless case. I'm a sentimentalist. The sad truth came to light again the other night when the wife and I sat down to watch the movie Rocky on television. It's a warmhearted romantic story about warm-hearted people. That's bad enough, but it even has a hopeftil happy ending. it sounds like something that came out of the thirties or forties, not the seventies. You're just not supposed to make that kind of moview or television show or book these days. Yet there I was, all choked up at the end. And afterward I wondered why they don't make more stories like that anymore. Yuck. How old fashioned. Better to go out and blow your brains out than admi! t such a wekness these days. Happy endings are out. Nice people are to be distrusted or better yet, ridiculed. A week ago I'd read a newspaper column in a Toronto newspaper which totaly panned the new Osmond family television show apparently because the people were all too nice. The writer called them the Nausmond family. Now I'm no fan of the show because, like too many other television shows these days, the quality of writing involved is so atrocious that it makes all the characters look idiotic because of the things the writers give them to say. Such criticism of the show would have been fair, but to criticize because the Osmonds smile so much and seem to like each other is getting carried away a little too much. But smiling and being happy is very suspect in the 1970's. _ A couple of years back another reviewer knocked singer John Denver for being so happy during a concert in Toronto. Anybody who had been around the hard-nosed music business for as many years as Denver, the reviewer said, couldn't be so happy and therefore he must be a fake. Our heroes in movies these days are tough, no-nonsense guys who seldom smile or show any emotion at all. Other people, men and women are either a nuisance or a convenience to thern. They invariably have a cold, cynical mean streak in them that is somehow supposed to make them attractive to audiences. It certainly is attractive to women. Our cold-hearted heros invariably end up having to beat off women with a stick (sometimes literally). ' Critics love th is kind of hero. SomehoW he's supposed to be more "real" than smiling happy heros. I've read many tittles of critics saying: that nice guys, real heroic types, are boring and given the good guy versus bad guy situation, they'll cheer for the bad guy every time. Maybe I'm over sensitive on this whole issue. I've got a vested interest after all. In my own plays and stores I tend to feature characters who, if not exactly heroic in demension, are at least nice honest people who try to do their best for themselves and toward those around them, I'm still a believer in the happy ending and I also like to see people enjoying themselves. To me, one of the most beautiful sounds in the world is to be in a theatre full of people all laughing so hard they can hardly stop to catch their breath. Now that too is old fashioned. The judgement of the "Sophistricates" comes down hard on writers like me. Comedy writers are too light. Somehow they're just playing at the game while the "Real" writers are turning out heavy plays and novels about hate and anger and deceit and mayhem that send the audience away in a fit of dispair. If your audience enjoyed themselves, you've obviously not done a very good job. You're something of a. hack writer. I think all people who work at making people hopeful and happy sooner or later question whether they're really any good at what they're doing. I've read so many stories about comic actors who long to do Shakespeare to prove that they've got as much talent as the "serious" actors. Writers too I think get hung up on their feelings of inadequacy because the people who• write sad stories are somehow taken as having more talent than those who write funny things. There's a place for both kinds of writingof course. When people are feeling too self-satisfied, too oblivious to the realities of the world then they need to have their baloon of c omplacency punctured by a gritty, realistic story. But in a world filled with grim horrors, where you get enough depression in oney day of listening to the news every hour on the hour to last a lifetime, then we also need funny stories, happy stories, success stories, stories to show us there is still Some hope for good people doing good things. The movie Rockey has probably helped a lot of people during the grim, cynical seventies. Surrounded as we are by heartache; war, cycnicisiti and depression, we need to See a hero who can be human and against the odds come out on top. We need a heck of a lot more stories like that just to keep us going. Snowplow operator Behind the scenes by Keith Roulston Nice guys finish last it C rr tc tl re tc it e: Cl n ir cc C qi d; Cl V in cc ti of ai 114 si cc