HomeMy WebLinkAboutTimes-Advocate, 1978-10-19, Page 20Page 20
By JACK RIDDELL
MPP Huron-Middlesex
Times-Advocate, October 19, 1978
The Niagara Escarpment
is the result of some 300
million years of erosion of
rock layers: its limestone
cliffs and ridges curve
through Ontario from
Niagara Falls to Tober
mory. Queenston Heights,
the rocky hills at the Forks
of the Credit and the cliffs of
the Bruce Peninsula all
form part of the Escarp
ment, which is well known
for its cliffs and caves,
forests and waterfalls - the
home of rare rock ferns and
orchids, of turkey vultures
and eagles.
Ontario Government
brochures wax lyrical about
the natural wonders of the
Escarpment - “rock, forest
and wavewashed cliffs,”
“unspoiled beauty”, “some
of the most breath-taking
scenery to be found
anywhere in Ontario”.
Some 10 years ago.
planner Leonard Gertler, in
a study prepared for the
Provincial Government,
predicted in detail how
quickly the Escarpment
area would be taken over by
residential and industrial
development if the Govern
ment did not take rapid and
effective action to prevent
the loss of escarpment land.
Yet three years went by
before the government im
posed temporary controls
and passed a * Pits and
Quarries Control Act
(criticized as being too
weak). Five years after the
Gertler Report, the Govern
ment announced establish
ment of the Niagara Escarp
ment Commission, to be in
charge of long-term plan
ning.
During the five-year inter
val, the Government spent
some $7 million to buy 20,000
acres on the Escarpment:
speculators had also been
very active in the area.
The Commission Chair
man has confirmed that
many applications to build
along the Escarpment were
received after the Commis
sion was established. More
than 90G of the applications
were approved, albeit with
objections from some Com
mission members.
There are three main
issues which have to be
taken into account by the
Commission in attempting
to carry out its work.
(1) Over all public good
versus the rights of the in
dividual landowner.
(2) Different attitudes
with respect to land restric
tions and the use of the
Escarpment.
(3) The assumption by the
Province of a land-use plan
ning function which has
traditionally been left to
municipalities.
Last February, the Com
mission published its
recommendations, which in
cluded: tougher quarrying
regulations: possible even
tual shutdown of quarries
right in the Scarp zone;
protective agricultural
legislation for some farming
409 MAIN STREET EXETER
PLAQUES ON DISPLAY — A large variety of crafts were on
display at Saturday's craft fair at Lucan. Shown with a dis
play of plaques are Vivian Baker and Jane Walker. T-A photo
LADIES WEAR
PROPRIETORS
OPENING SOON
WATCH NEXT WEEK'S T-A FOR DETAILS
0
WELCOME
The Employees of
Glendale
Corporation
R.V Division
(Strathroy)
Dental Plan 7
These employees and their families have good
reason to smile .. . they have the best preven-
. tive dental plan available today. Everybody
agrees good teeth are one of the most imppr-
tant factors in good health. The Blue Cross
Dental Plan 7 was designed to provide basic
dental treatment to group subscribers includ
ing such services as examinations, f i I lings and
x-rays, through extractions and anaesthesia
"As your Ontario Blue Cross
representative I am pleased to
add my personal welcome, and
look forward to serving you
along with the many others in
this region already enjoying
the protection of a variety of
Blue Cross Plans."
Phil deBarros
227 Queens Avenue. London, Ontario N6A 1J8
(519)439-4431
3104
A DIVISION OF THE ONTARIO HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
9
areas: a scenic resource
designation for 331,000
acres, with special develop
ment control policies;
restrictions on housing
development along the shore
of Lake Ontario; further
development of the Bruce
Trail; and 754 kilometres
(468 miles) of scenic drives
along the Escarpment.
The Commission’s
recommendations triggered
demonstrations and letter-
yvriting campaigns. Conser
vationists supported the
basic aims of the proposals,
but felt they didn’t go far
enough. Landowners along
the Escarpment called for
the abolition of the Commis
sion.-
In May, the Provincial
Government and the Com
mission, responding to con
siderable public pressure,
announced that the Escarp
ment planning area would be
reduced by 60%. New boun
daries will not, however, be
decided until the end of this
year.
The Niagara Escarpment
Planning and Development
Act expresses the intention
of the Legislature that the
Escarpment should be main
tained “substantially as a
continuous natural en
vironment” and that only
such development should be
permitted as will be “com
patible with that natural en
vironment”.
There have been occasions
in the past when the Liberal
Caucus has differed with the
way in which the Commis
sion has sought to imple
ment this mandate. These
differences culminated in
the presentation of a Private
Member’s Bill by Robert
McKessock (MPP Grey)
last session which, if passed,
would have restricted the
Commission’s control to the
Escarpment itself and 1,000
feet on either side.
However, we have no
quarrel with the Com
mission’s decision last April
whereby it refused to issue a
development permit to Can-
trakon Limited for an ex
ecutive hotel and conference
centre at Caledon. The Com
mission’s reasons, sup
ported on appeal by Hearing
Officer David Jamieson,
were compelling - namely,
that the site of the project is
antagonistic to the preserva
tion of the Escarpment as a
continuous natural environ
ment.
The Cantrakon project is
an excellent idea - in the
wrong place. We cannot
allow a major hotel complex
to be built on the face of the
Scarp itself, overlooking the
Forks of the Credit - one of
the most scenic spots along
the entire Escarpment - and
hope to maintain public sup
port for the preservation of
the Escarpment as part of
Ontario’s heritage.
If thjs corporate retreat is
permitted, on what grounds
will other development be
denied? It is not difficult to
imagine an Escarpment
dotted with magnificent lux
ury hotels and idyllic homes
from Queenston to Tober
mory. But that is not what
the Legislature or the public
wants.
Housing Minister Claude
Bennett was wrong to
override the decision of the
Commission and the
recommendation of the
Hearing Officer in this case.
His stated reason was that
the project will be “of
economic benefit to the
area”. He seems to be the
only person who feels that
particular area needs this
kind of economic benefit.
His real reasons are to be
found in the report of the
Hearing Officer and in other
documentation, namely that
it would be a boost to the
commercial tourist in
dustry. It would indeed, and
we support it - but not on the
face of the Escarpment.
One thing about early
marriages is they shorten
the generation gap.
r
Gabian Stone
Calcium
Chloride
in 100 pound bags
Sand & Stone
Gravel
Stone for
Weeping Beds
EARL LIPPERT
TRUCKING LTD.
Creditor. 234-6382
WESTCANE
WHITE
SUGAR 2 Kg. BAG
REG.
99C
Mc
REG.
s5.99
NESCAFE-10 oz.
INSTANT
COFFEE
HEINZ - 20 oz.It*
TOMATO
KETCHUP
’4.78
REG.
93c
FRESH ONTARIO PORK
SIDE SPARERIBS
WE RESERVE THE RIGHT TO LIMIT PURCHASES