HomeMy WebLinkAboutTimes-Advocate, 1978-04-06, Page 13Unless schools open soon, students face handicap
By HENRY HESS
Most Huron County
students applying for places
in colleges and universities
this fall probably won’t be
handicapped by the fact they
have missed more than a
month of classes,
However unless the
schools reopen soon they will
be at a disadvantage in
competing for places in
limited enrolment programs
or for scholarships, and
those who planned to work
hard this semester to pull
their marks up could be in
trouble.
Everything still hinges on
the students being able to get
back to school in time to
complete the year.
A survey last week of some
colleges and universities
revealed they are aware of
the situation here but are
continuing to process ap
plications, banking on the
strike being settled.
“A lot will depend on how
much longer the strike goes
on,” according to Grant
Clark, assistant to the
executive director of the
Toronto-based Council of
Ontario Universities.
April 21 is the date for
submitting marks to back up
applications to universities
and he said it is “fairly
crucial” the deadline is met.
“It causes real difficulties
if the universities don’t have
interim (spring) marks
When they’re looking at
marks from across the
province,” he explained.
Robert Ritter, principal of
F. E. Madill Secondary
School in Wingham, said if
schools here don’t reopen in
time a student’s first term
marks will be reported as the
interim marks to univer
sities. The strike would have
to be settled at least a week
be.fore the deadline for any
second term marks to be
included, he said.
“I think our standards are
highly respected and I think
they would accept those (as
interim marks),” he added.
He pointed out first term
marks have already been
included in ail applications
to community colleges and
students are admitted on
that basis.
Mr. Clark agreed if
students have a record of
high marks and are clearly
admissible they will
.probably be admitted under
the early schedule (in June)
regardless of a lack of
current marks, but he noted
marginal students or those
vying for scholarships or
places in limited programs
will be at a disadvantage.
The council has taken no
official position with respect
to this strike, he said, though
at the time of the Toronto
teachers’ strike in 1975 it
issued a statement saying it
expected students to make
every effort to make up lost
work.
Will consider applications
Peter Trom, associate
registrar at the University of
Guelph promised: “We will
consider applications for the
fall semester based on any
information available,”
either grade 13 credits
completed or the grade 12
average.
He noted there have been
strikes in the province before
and suggested acceptance
could be made conditional on
successful completion of
grade 13, provided the strike
’ is settled this year.
“We will have to be
sympathetic; it’s not the
students’ fault,” he said.
He also promised: “We
wouldn’t put students in a
position where they couldn’t
cope with university work.”
Guelph has courses
equivalent to Grade 13 level
in math and science
available to students en
tering those programs, so it
would be possible to make up
work missed this year.
However the courses do not
count as credit toward a
degree.
There would be some
differences in the way ap
plications are handled if the
strike drags on and students
can’t provide all necessary
information, he pointed out.
If that happens instead of
proceeding automatically,
each case would be con
sidered on its own merits,
based on information
available at the time, by an
admissions committee.
Lack of current marks
would' present less of a
problem in some of the
limited enrolment programs
such as agriculture or land
scape architecture since
admittance to these is based
in large part on a personal
interview and other factors
beyond grades, he added.
But he also pointed out that
without grade 13 marks the
university wouldn't have any
basis for awarding
scholarships.
Too many'ifs'
Steve Little, the liaison
officer for the University of
Waterloo, had more
reservations about the ef
fects of a prolonged strike on
students’ chances, par
ticularly in specialized
programs such as
engineering, math or
science.
They will be at a disad
vantage against other
students if the marks are
late getting in; “there are
too many ifs to hold places
for students”, he said.
However he promised the
university will deal with any
marks received prior to June
16, the date universities send
out most offers of admission.
“What we’re going to do if
the students don’t get back to
school I don’t know,” he
admitted, but said he
assumes the universities will
take a collective approach
toward the situation. The
university would have no
procedure to follow, he said:
“We never had to handle
applications from students
who missed that much
school.”
He predicted students
would have difficulty in
limited enrolment programs
and in programs like math
and science with specific
prerequisites and would be
unlikely to be successful.
“There’s a whale of a
difference between an arts
program where there are no
specified Grade 13
prerequisites and
engineering where five of six
(Grade 13) courses are
specified,” he pointed out.
Too early to panic
According to Gerri
Downie, associate registrar
at Conestoga College, it’s too
early for students to get into
a panic over their chances
there this fall.
Conestoga will continue to
process applications as
normal and if the strike is
prolonged it will defer the
requirement to produce
documents, she said.
The first acceptance
notices went out April 1 and,
as usual, are conditional
upon completion of grade 12.
She added the college’s
position has been set out in a
letter to D. J. Cochrane,
director for the Huron
County board of education.
Ron Cummins, registrar at
Fanshawe College, London,
agreed that at the ap
plication stage the strike is
not a factor.
The college began
receiving applications in
January and its decisions
are based largely on grade 11
final marks and grade 12
mid-year marks so the lack
of spring term marks hasn’t
affected the process. Fan
shawe also started sending
out offers of admission April
1 with admission conditional
on successful completion of
grade 12.
“These students will be
treated exactly the same as
any others,” he emphasized.
He said the question what
would happen if they are -
unable to complete Grade 12
because of the strike is
Something that hasn’t been
looked at definitively. The
government sets admission
requirements and if a
student hasn’t completed the
requirements the college
can’t legally admit him, he
said. In such a case some
action by the minister of
colleges and universities,
Harry Parrott, might be
required.
A lot of colleges in this part
of the province are quite
concerned about the problem
posed by the strike and are
keeping close tabs on it, he
added.
Probably won't lose
There have been a number
of teachers’ strikes in
Ontario since legislation
allowing them to strike was
introduced in 1975 but none
have resulted in students
losing credit for the year;
most persons contacted are
betting it won’t happen this
time either.
“We have had other cases
where it has gone down to D-
Day but it was always
resolved and they finished
the year,” Mr. Trom said.
Mr. Ritter said he is
concerned about the effects
of the strike on all the
students, not just the
graduating or borderline
ones, but he doesn’t think
there is any likelihood they
will lose their year,
On the other hand he can’t
guarantee everyone will be
successful in being promoted
either, he pointed out. “I
couldn’t ever say that.” But
he said if students have been
passing there is no reason to
think they won’t this year.
He said he and other
principals are very con
cerned about the duration
and timing of the strike*
noting it is getting into a
critical time toward the end
of the year. If it continues
much longer it will probably
be necessary to cancel the
final exams in order to make
up lost class time, he said.
“At this point we haven’t
made the decision to cancel
out the finals but it is on our
minds.”
He noted that by
eliminating the finals in
addition to the mid-term
exams already eliminated it
would be possible to pick up
about 20 days instructional
time and, "we could come
pretty close to covering the
essentials of the courses”.
Especially for the
graduating students it will be
necessary to look at courses
pretty carefully in terms of
what could be taught and
what must be taught, he
said. It will be necessary to
eliminate some of the op
tional topics, which could
make it rough on students
planning to enter specialized
university courses where
they must score high in the
first year in order to
proceed.
Classes had been
scheduled to end June 7
followed by a six day exam
period ending June 15.
Theoretically the schedule
could be extended but any
changes must be approved
by education Minister
Thomas Wells and it would
be extremely difficult to add
more than a few days, Mr.
Ritter said. There has as yet
been no official discussion
about extending the school
year, he added.
Times - Advocate
Serving South Huron, North Middlesex J& North Lambton Since 1873
1
& North Lambton Since 1873
■ \
[
I
TEACHER WORKLOAD Times-Advocate, April 6, 1978 TEACHER WORKLOAD
We, the parents of Huron County Secondary
School students, want to know what issues are
so important that they are depriving our teen
agers of their education. We have asked that the
contract proposals be printed along with last
year’s contract, so that we may understand the
problems causing the stalemate in negotiations.
There are 2 items yet to be settled: 1. Teacher
Workload
2. Sick Leave Credit Gratuity
LAST YEAR’S CONTRACT
(1) The Board shall endeavour to achieve the
following guidelines.
(a) MAXIMUM PUPIL PERIOD
CONTACTS (P.P.C’s)
(This means the total number of students
a teacher sees in a day.)
Advanced (5 year courses) ..............................175
General (4 year courses).................................155
Technical...........................................................140
Special education.............................................100
(b) MAXIMUM CLASS SIZE
Advanced and Commercial (typing and
business machines only).........30 students
General and Open (including other
Commercial subjects)...........25 students
Technical, Home Economics practical
and Special Education Academic
..................................................20 students
Special Education practical ...15 students
(c) LESSON PREPARATIONS
The Board shall endeavour to maintain an
average of three lesson preparations per
cycle per teacher.
(d) ASSIGNED TIME
75% instructional, 25% preparation and
marking.
(e) APPEALS
Where exceptions to the above guidelines
exist on September 30th, the teacher in
volved shall be made aware, by the prin
cipal, of the factors causing the excep
tion. If the teacher is not satisfied with
the explanation he/she may appeal to the
Appeal and Review Committee.
2. Branch Affiliate Members (hereafter called
teachers) shall not cover classes for other
teachers who are absent except on an
emergency basis as determined by the prin
cipal. When any one teacher has covered 6
classes the principal will inform the Board
and the teacher will be reimbursed in the
amount paid to a qualified teacher.
THE PARENTS ASK
1. How many teachers complained of overload
in working conditions during the past 2 years?
What was the main problem?
Board Answer: There were no complaints
received from teachers regarding working
conditions over the last 2 years by the Board
or its administration.
Teachers Answer: It is difficult to calculate
the exact number of teachers who complained
to principals about working conditions
because so many variables apply in the case
of any teacher’s timetable. However,
statistics in two areas may be revealing: In
the 1976-77 period, before any workload clause
existed in the agreement, 76 teachers (28%)
taught 7 periods and would feel unfairly
treated considering that 72% of the teachers
taught 6 periods. Also in that period 58
teachers (21%) had excessively high Pupil
Period Contacts and would feel unfairly
treated since 79% had reasonable PPC’s. In
the period of the 1977-78 school year 48
teachers (17%) worked 7 periods and 51
teachers (18.6%) were over in their PPC’s.
These teachers naturally felt unfairly treated
since their workload was in excess of the
guideline figures. Grievances were lodged
that year to bring the situation to the atten
tion of the Board.
2. Last year there was an Appeal and Review
Committee. We heard it was inactive. Is this
true and why?
Board Answer: During the academic year
1976/77 there was an Appeal and Review Com
mittee. The Appeal and Review Committee
met once. It met to consider the grievance of
a teacher who quit teaching at age 37 and was
claiming approximately $10,000 from the
Board as a retirement gratuity. No other
problems were referred to it by the teachers.
Teachers Answer: Following the 1971 mass
resignations both parties thought an Appeal
• and Review Committee was necessary to
provide a forum for discussion and head off
confrontation situations. This committee
worked well from that time until June 1977.
The committee had met previously in the
1976-77 school year and were able to resolve
four problems amicably. It ceased to operate
when the committee was faced with a
problem which involved differences in basic
philosophy.
3. How many classes are now over the
guidelines suggested in the 1976-77 contract?
LATEST BOARD OFFER
(a) A Workload Committee comprised of
one trustee-appointed by the Board
one teacher-appointed by District 45 OSSTF
Executive Council
one principal-appointed by Huron Co. Secon
dary School Principals Association
one senior administrator-appointed by the
Director of Education
will monitor the workload distribution and
will submit reports and/or recommen
dations to the Director of Education in May
and October and, where necessary, through
him to the Board.
(b) Any teacher who feels that he has been
treated unfairly in the assignment of
workload may complain in succession to his
Principal, Superintendent, and Director of
Education. In the settlement of such com
plaints the decision of the Director of
Education, after consultation with the
Workload Committee, shall be final and bin
ding.
Notwithstanding the provisions of this sec
tion, if the Director of Education does not
render a decision within 30 days of being
made aware of the complaint, the complai
nant may invoke the provisions of Articles 8
&9.
BOARD POLICY STATEMENT
RE WORKLOAD
Within the limits imposed by the approved
pupil/teacher ratio, the Board will strive to
equalize the workload in its secondary school
through preparation of a “Workload Guideline”.
By March 1st each year the Director of Educa
tion will issue to each secondary school prin
cipal, for use in preparing his timetable, a
“Workload Guideline’’ which
(1) has been developed in co-operation with
representatives of the teachers, Board,
Headmasters’ Association, and the senior
administration;
(2) takes into account, as far as possible, for
each teacher
(a) the total ntimber of students taught
(b) the size of each class or section
(c) the nature of the program offered in the
department
(d) the number of lesson preparations and
the amount of student work to be marked
(e) the level of difficulty of the subject(s)
(f) the degree of involvement with other
school activities
(3) attempts to prevent individual teachers
from being responsible for unusually large
numbers of students; and
(4) provides reasonable amounts of non
teaching time for administration, prepara
tion, marking, and supervision.
(5) incorporates provision for teacher to re
quest a review of this workload, through
hierarchical stages, to the Board.
(a) PUPIL Period contacts (PPC’s)
No teacher’s PPC’s shall exceed the follow
ing guidelines:
Students taking Advanced Credits
(including typing and business
machines) ..................................................180
Students taking General Credits (including
other commercial subjects)......................155
Students taking Technical Credits
(including Family Studies practical, Special
Education Academic & Remedial).........140
Students taking Special Education
Credits........................................................100
(b) AVERAGE CLASS SIZE
No teacher’s average class shall exceed the
following guidelines:
Advanced....................................30 students
General........................................25 students
Technical....................................20 students
Special Education Practical......15 students
(c) LESSON PREPARATIONS
The Board shall make every effort to main
tain an average of three lesson preparations
per cycle per teacher.
LATEST TEACHER PROPOSAL
(f) WORKLOAD GRIEVANCES
(i) No grievance on the subject of workload
may be initiated prior to September 30 in
any school year.
(ii) Notwithstanding Article 8 - Grievance
Procedure, no grievance shall be lodged
by any teacher prior to September 30,
1978 in regard to any alleged violation of
13.03
(iii) Notwithstanding Article 8 - Grievance
Procedure, no grievance shall be lodged
by a teacher in regard to any alleged
violation of 13.03 (a) or 13.03 (b) unless
the alleged violation encompasses both
13.03 and 13.03 (b)
(g) WORKLOAD COMMITTEE
(i) A Workload Committee shall be establish
ed which shall consist of:
2 trustees appointed by the Board
2 teachers appointed by the Branch Af
filiate
2 principals or vice-principals appointed
by the Headmasters’ Association.
The Director of Education or his
designate
(d) ASSIGNED TIME
(i) The Board shall make every effort to have
the maximum teaching timetable load for
a teacher not exceed 75% of his full possi
ble timetable. (Note: The lunch period is
not to be considered as part of the
timetable.)
Example: 6 periods for a one-day 8 period
cycle
Example: 6 periods for a two-day 8 period
cycle
(ii) The remainder of the periods on a
teacher’s timetable shall be designated
as:
(a) administration, or
(b) preparation and marking
Note: Administration periods and
preparation and marking periods may be
reassigned by the principal as set forth in
13.03 (g)
(iii) It is understood that as of September 30
in the contract year, the number of
teachers teaching in excess of 75% of a
full possible timetable shall not exceed
the number doing so as of that date in
the previous contract year.
(e) OCCASIONAL TEACHING
Teachers shall not cover classes for other
members who are absent except on an
emergency basis as determined by the prin
cipal. A record of classes covered by each
teacher will be maintained by the principal.
When any one teacher has covered 6 classes,
the principal will inform the Board and the
teacher will be reimbursed in the amount
paid per day to a qualified teacher.
(ii) The Workload Committee shall monitor
the workload of each teacher and may
make recommendations for changes in
such workload through the Director of
Education to the Board between May 1
and September 30 of each calendar year.
SICK LEAVE GRATUITY
LAST YEAR’S CONTRACT
A teacher who has completed 12 years service in
Huron County schools and who is eligible for a
pension under the provisions of the Teachers’
Superannuation Act shall be entitled to the pay
ment of a gratuity on termination of employ
ment.
LATEST BOARD OFFER
A teacher who has completed 12 years service in
Huron County schools shall be entitled to the
payment of a. gratuity on termination of employ
ment provided that he
(1) is eligible for a pension under the provisions
of the Teachers’ Superannuation Act and has
attained the age of 50 years.
OR
(2) is in receipt of a pension under the
provisions of the Teachers’ Superannuation
Act including, without limiting the generali
ty of the foregoing, a disability pension.
LATEST TEACHER PROPOSAL (same as last
year’s contract)
A teacher who has completed 12 years service in
Huron County schools and who is eligible for a
pension under the provisions of the Teachers’
Superannuation Act shall be entitled to the pay
ment of a gratuity on termination of employ
ment.
Do you feel this number is serious enough to
prolong this strike?
Board Answer: The number of teachers in the
county (i) in excess of average class size of
30-3
(ii) in excess of 180 PPC’s-1
155 PPC’s-10
140 PPC’s-0
100 PPC’s-0
(iii) in excess of average class size and PPC’s-1
No.
Teachers Answer: The number of classes now
over the guidelines is no longer relevant
because no changes could be made at this point
in the school year. What is important is that
there be guidelines for the coming school year
so that we do not return to the great inequities
which existed prior to our having workload
protection in the agreement.
4. Why is the board so opposed to the class size,
pupil period contact, etc. details,-while the
teachers are so opposed to a workload com
mittee. Could not both proposals accomplish
the same aim?
Board Answer: The Board is opposed to fixed,
inflexible absolutes. The Board is also of the
opinion that they and not the teachers were
elected to manage the school system of Huron
County through its administrators. If the
teachers were to use the committee approach
objectively, then the continued high quality of
education can be maintained. Unfortunately
this Federation demand is really a “job
security” issue and little else.
Teacher Answer: The Board must give its
reasons for opposing workload guidelines.
The teachers do not object to a workload com
mittee but they see its function as monitoring
rather than establishing guidelines. We feel
that it is the Board’s responsibility to set
down workload guidelines so that all teachers
in the county will be treated in the same way.
The Board’s most recent offer of a Board
policy (changeable at any time by them)
offers a date of March 1 in each year for es
tablishing guidelines. In other words, no
guidelines this year, but maybe for next year;
that is, for the school year beginning
September 1979.
5. In regard to sick leave gratuity, the only
difference between the Board proposal and
the teacher position is the addition of “has at
tained the age of 50 years”. Why is this point
so important?
Board Answer: The original intent of this
clause was to be a pay out for a retiring
teacher, not a cash out provision.
Teacher Answer: A sick leave credit gratuity
established under the Education Act allows
teachers to collect one-half of their unused
sick leave credits when they leave teaching.
Beacause they have not used their sick leave
during their careers, they have saved the
Board the cost of supply teachers for those
days. The teachers feel that age fifty is unfair
because it penalizes a teacher who has
devoted himself to Huron county rather than
coming here to complete his career. E.g, a
teacher comes to Huron when he is 38 and
teaches 12 years (required for eligibility), he
retires at 50 and collects his sick leave credit
gratuity. Another teacher comes to Huron at
age 23 and teaches for this county for 26
years; he is only 49 and cannot collect his sick
leave credits.
6. Do you favour the use of an arbitrator to set
tle this dispute? Why?
Board Answer: No. We feel accountable to the
people in Huron County to settle our own
problems.
Teacher Answer: Yes. We first suggested this
in September 1977. This is the fastest way to
get education going again. It becomes nonsen
sical to refuse outside assistance when the
parties can no longer negotiate and solve
their problems. If one feels that one’s offer is
reasonable, one should be willing to allow an
arbitrator to make the decision. It is im
perative that the school system in this county
resume operation as quickly as possible and
arbitration appears to be the only way.
7. What are the long range financial im
plications if the settlement favours the
teachers’ position regarding work load?
Board Answer: The result, could be even
smaller classes, therefore more teachers;
therefore additional costs. The long range im
plication is a shift of financial burden from
provincial grants to local ratepayers.
Teacher Answer: There are no long-range
financial implications. Quite simply, it is the
pupil-teacher ratio that determines how
many teachers shall be hired. The workload
guidelines merely attempt to spread the
workload more equitably among those
teachers.
8. What are the long range workload im
plications if the settlement favours the
Board's proposal of a committee?
Board Answer: The Board’s proposal offers
the opportunity for input by teachers in an
ever changing situation.
Teacher Answer: If a settlement favoured the
Board’s present offer of a committee,
teachers would have no workload protection
and we could be returning to the situation we
had a few years ago, of two teachers in the
same department, one teaching a total load of
95 students, the other teaching over 200.
9. Do you agree with the Principals of Huron
County who have stated that the successful
completion of the year is in danger?
Board Answer: Any prolonged interruption in
the school year affects the students.
Teacher Answer: Yes, we agree that for a
growing number of students the successful
completion of their year is in danger. We feel
that it is not only the senior students who need
regular classes, but all students.
10. What suggestions do you have to get serious
negotiations under way again?
Board Answer: The Board’s position is
reasonable. We were willing to try the
teachers’ original workload proposal in the
1976-77 contract, but we found it conflicted
with the PTR (Pupil-Teacher Ratio) clause.
Why won’t the teachers at least try the
Board’s proposal?
Teacher Answer: We have already requested
the mediator, Mr. Harvey Ladd, to once
again attempt to get the parties together.
This may have been accomplished by the
time this is printed. If that attempt is un
successful, then once more we would ask the
Board to go to voluntary binding arbitration.
This would enable teachers and students to
return to their classrooms while arbitration
is going on. There is absolutely no point in
waiting for the Education Relations Com
mission to step in and eventually have com
pulsory binding arbitration imposed. We can
ask now, voluntarily, but only if the Board
agrees.
Parents, you now have some facts. You now
have some opinions, suggestions, or perhaps
further questions. Write to your Trustee or to
Teachers Federation, Hotel Clinton, Clinton,
Ontario; or to Huron County Board of Educa
tion, Clinton, Ontario; or to Thomas Wells,
Minister of Education, Parliament Bldgs,
Toronto or better still all three!
The situation is serious. Don’t underestimate
what your letter can do.