Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Citizen, 2008-11-27, Page 5THE CITIZEN, THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 2008. PAGE 5. Bonnie Gropp TThhee sshhoorrtt ooff iitt One old grandma T hey call hunting and fishing ‘game’. It’s the only game where the other team never volunteered to play. – Matt North So these two brothers, Good Ol’ Boys, are creeping along in their pickup, headlights off, down a rural back road outside Owen Sound, Ontario just after sundown. They’re driving slow, peering intently into woodlots and brush piles on both sides of the road. Finally the driver sees what they’re looking for. He cuts the ignition, coasts to a stop, nods wordlessly towards a thicket of scrub willow. White-tail buck. Three-pointer. Silhouetted against the horizon. The brother in the passenger seat rolls down his window, hauls out a high-powered hunting rifle from behind the seat and draws a bead. No need to hurry. The deer just stands there like a statue. BLAM! BLAM! The deer is still standing there like a statue. BLAM! That’s because it is a statue. A decoy. Two conservation officers materialize by the pickup and the brothers are busted for poaching. Hunting from a car: redneck couch potato heaven. Almost as much fun as fishing with dynamite. I’d like to tell you the judge threw the book at them, but the brothers found themselves a slithery lawyer who argued that using a decoy deer to tantalize his clients amounted to entrapment. The case has dragged on through two appeals and three years of litigation and shows no sign of resolution anytime soon. If there’s a glint of gold in this judicial mare’s nest, perhaps it’s the fact that animals – even ersatz ones – are finally getting their day in court. But change has been coming for some time. Don’t forget just a few generations ago, English bluebloods thought it great sport to put a bear in a pit and unleash a pack of hunting dogs to worry it to death. Jim West might have a tough time believing that. He’s a recreational hunter who lives up near 70 Mile House in British Columbia. West was out with his dogs scouting for moose one day when a hunter’s worst nightmare came thundering down on him. He got himself between a bear cub and a very angry Momma Grizzly. She swatted him sprawling, not once but twice. West grabbed a tree limb and swatted back. He managed to stun the bear, then kill it with the tree limb. West stumbled back to his vehicle and drove himself to a hospital. The cuts in his scalp, arms and face took 60 stitches to close. He was lucky to be alive. Then his real troubles started. Word of his encounter hit the media – along with the news that conservation officers had tracked down and destroyed two bear cubs the mother bear had been protecting. Animal rights crusaders ignited a firestorm of protest. West’s phone began to ring around the clock. A blizzard of e-mails hit media outlets across the province. One zealot went so far as to impersonate Jim West, sending out a fake e-mail in West’s name claiming that actually, his dogs had started the whole thing by chasing the bears up a tree. One woman accosted West and asked him why he hadn’t ‘just run away’when he saw the bear. I doubt that West would have got very far. I’ve been told that in a 100-yard dash, a grizzly can outrun a horse. Jim West agrees. “You can’t outrun a mother bear,” he says. A lot of folks get a tad dotty when it comes to our relations with animals – few more so than Jennifer Thornburg, of North Carolina. Excuse me – that should be Cut-out Dissection.com of North Carolina. Ms err…Cut-out Dissection…had her name legally changed to publicize the plight of animals which wind up as specimens in high school biology classes. She acknowledges that her new moniker can be a bit of a pain. “I normally do have to repeat my name several times when I am introducing myself,” she says. But it’s a price she’s willing to pay on behalf of the suffering animals. Yeah, well… Looney Tunes like Ms Cut-out Dissection.com aside, perhaps we actually have hauled ourselves a rung or so higher on the evolutionary ladder. Maybe we’ve outgrown the notion that we can treat the rest of the natural world as our personal amusement park-cum-petting/shooting zoo. If so, Lady Margo Asquith was ‘way ahead of her time. The British socialite and wife of an Earl lived when bear-baiting was still legal and ‘riding to the hounds’ was all the rage. At a ball, she overheard someone extolling the remarkable jumping prowess of various fox- harrying horsemen. “Jump?” sniffed Lady Asquith, “Anyone can jump. Look at fleas.” Arthur Black Other Views Blam! Blam! a-hunting we will go Liberal Premier Dalton McGuinty is finding – like a Progressive Conservative predecessor, Mike Harris – even powerful premiers are not above the law. McGuinty has been told by two courts a law he brought in that gives farm workers the right to form associations, but not to bargain collectively with their employers over pay or job conditions, violates their rights and the province will have to change it. McGuinty has been asked quickly by New Democrats to assure he will not appeal the judges’ ruling and said he needs time to think about it. But the case closely resembles one Harris lost, on same-sex relationships, and it seems unlikely any attempt by McGuinty to persuade the judicial system to change its mind would be successful. McGuinty had the legislature pass his law soon after winning an election in 2003 and following a long debate in which an NDP government gave farm workers power to form unions and bargain and Harris’s government took it away. In more recent decisions, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld the Constitution’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which gives residents the right of freedom of association, allows hospital employees in British Columbia to bargain collectively and that province violated this by passing a law interfering with collective bargaining. The Ontario Court of Appeal has now reinforced this by ruling the law McGuinty brought in substantially impairs this right and has to be re-written. In the case with similarities involving Harris, the Supreme Court of Canada found the Charter requires provinces to give same- sex couples the same rights they give couples of opposite sexes living together. Harris’s government was opposed to providing these rights, but complied reluctantly. Harris said he considered marriage as “me, my wife and our two kids,” although ironically he separated from his wife soon after and was seen with younger women. To show he disapproved of the new Ontario law that was required, Harris gave it an odd, unwieldy title, An Act To Amend Certain Statutes Because of the Supreme Court of Canada Decision In M v H, while most laws have titles of only a few words – but he still obeyed the court. McGuinty will not find it easy to comply with the courts’ directions. There are arguments for and against giving farm workers power to form unions and negotiate collectively with employers. They are among the lowest-paid workers and many, particularly in agribusinesses such as mushroom plants and chicken hatcheries, work under dirty and dangerous conditions. A case can be made readily they deserve higher wages and better conditions when compared to other workers. A main argument against unionization over the years has been farms need employees who can work long hours when called on, particularly during harvesting, without restrictions that add unmanageable costs. This is true particularly of smaller, family farms, which are especially vulnerable. Farms increasingly are big and in some ways like other industries, but many still are family businesses. Farmers also already are having difficulty competing against lower-cost produce from abroad, often subsidized by their countries of origin. No government would want either type to go under, for the sake of those owning and employed by them and particularly at a time when job losses are the biggest issue in Ontario politics. The Liberals do not want to risk losing votes in ridings still dominated by farmers, although these are steadily dwindling. The Court of Appeal has given McGuinty 12 months to introduce legislation that will permit and protect the right of farm workers to set up unions to bargain collectively with their employers. The court said the province cannot deny farm workers the right to collective bargaining on economic grounds, when it allows it to almost every other class of worker. The judgment was written by Chief Justice Warren Winkler, the two judges sitting with him agreed unanimously, the Supreme Court of Canada thought much the same way – it does not sound like a ruling that will be easily overturned. Eric Dowd FFrroomm QQuueeeenn’’ss PPaarrkk Sometimes the truth hurts, and sometimes it’s just plain funny. Especially when it’s a child’s sweet tone that delivers the caustic bite. My grandson has spent a lot of time in the company of adults. He has, as a result, a vernacular that is often unexpected, putting an extra spin on the typical out-of-the mouths-of- babes perspicacity. A recent travel on snowy roads brought such a moment. Grandpa Gropp was delivering his eight-year-old passenger home when a light snow began to spit a fluffy coat around them. Looking up ahead it was clear to any observer that that coat was going to get a lot thicker too. The backseat driver, however, wasn’t willing to take the risk. “Papa,” he said, “be careful. It’s getting stormy up there. I can see better than you, you know.” Curious as to how this conversation could play out, Mark foolishly opened the figurative door, asking Mitchell why he assumed that. A moment’s pause, accompanied by some under the breath mumbling followed. Then after further prompting, came the sigh of surrender. “Well... there’s really no easy way to say this,” he answered, the touch of melancholy in the tone clearly indicating he wished there was. But that door had been opened, he was being pushed, there was no choice but to go through it. “You’re old,” he finished. Just guess how I reacted to that story when it was related later. However, after my laughter faded, light was cast in a different direction. As I hope Mitchell does, I adored my grandparents. But with no apologies I would say they were old from the day I knew them. Each was in their 60s when they welcomed my arrival into the family and they were already physically slowed by a life of hard work. Grandpas were stooped and bespectacled, grandmas wrinkled and aproned. Yet, I was always content in their company, whether I was chattering as I followed them around, listening to recitations and songs, or standing on a stool at the kitchen cupboard. They weren’t likely to toss a baseball or embark upon a rambunctious game of tag. Worn down by wars, the depression and daily struggles, imagination had long ago been put to sleep. But they never bored me. They were comforting entertainment, like snuggling into a cozy chair with a blanket, a book and a cup of cocoa on a wintry day. They felt safe. Grandma was the soft touch to run to when mom and dad were giving you a rash. Grandma was the calm and quiet assurance, the gentle voice to separate you from the craziness. Grandma was the one to take the time when others had none. And it is these traits of my own grandmothers that I aspire to. That said... with a fondness for denim and rock and roll I’ve always kind of thought Mark and I were fairly young, somewhat hip grandparents. I have lain on the floor, lifted a child on my feet and spun him. I have enjoyed rousing games of badminton and baseball with my grandson. I have crept and crawled my way around a game of hide-and-seek and attacked, badly, Sunshine of Your Love on Guitar Hero. We are, after all, the 50-is-the-new-40 generation, the Zoomers. We carry with us the legacy of the flower children, free love and the women’s movement. We are more proactive about the quality of our life than any generation before us, and exercise, cream and Botox our way to rejuvenation. Yet now, it seems the eyes of one child may have been seeing me entirely differently than I’ve seen myself. And the truth is, there’s no arguing — his eyesight is better. Powerful premiers not above the law The unselfish effort to bring cheer to others will be the beginning of a happier life for ourselves. – Helen Keller Final Thought