HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Citizen, 2008-06-05, Page 5THE CITIZEN, THURSDAY, JUNE 5, 2008. PAGE 5.
Bonnie
Gropp
TThhee sshhoorrtt ooff iitt
Sing its praises
As a compelling attention-getter, there’s
nothing quite like a nose in the
crotch.
An uninvited nose, I hasten to add.
This one was large, wet and attached to the
snout of a German shepherd – which was in
turn leashed to the brawny right arm of a
brush-cut, flint-eyed, humourless-looking
chap with a badge on his chest and a Glock-
nine on his hip.
Where was this happening – a DMZ border
crossing between the Koreas? A lockdown
weapons inspection site outside Baghdad’s
Green Zone?
Nope. This scene was playing out in the
bucolic outskirts of Toronto – Pearson
International Airport to be precise.
I was standing in a lineup in Terminal Two,
waiting to board a flight to Thunder Bay. The
Mountie and his faithful furry companion
were sauntering up and down the lines of
passengers checking crotches, shoes, baby-
strollers and carry-ons.
“Just a random drug check,” Robocop
muttered, by way of explanation.
Like that made it okay.
We are a placid, docile flock, we Canucks.
I’m old enough to remember a time when I
would have slugged any stranger waving a
metal wand next to my nether regions, but
nowadays I submit to the ‘pre-screen
boarding’ grope with nary a bleat. I even
undo my belt and hold out my arms on
request.
So it was with the ‘random drug check’ at
Pearson. No one in the long, snaking lineup –
including yours truly – complained about the
gross and gratuitous invasion of privacy.
This happened five years ago. It burned me
then and it burns me still. How did it come to
pass that we all came to behave like gonad-
deprived sheep and to surrender our dignity so
meekly?
Well, some, but not all of us. Some brave
soul at St. Patrick’s High School in Sarnia had
the courage to blow the whistle on the whistle-
blowers.
Back in November 2002, students at St.
Patrick’s looked up from their books to behold
a squad of Ontario’s Finest, complete with
sniffer dogs, descending upon their school.
The students were confined to their classrooms
for over two hours while the dogs and their
handlers snuffled backpacks and nosed
through lockers.
Acting on a hot drug tip, right?
No, there was no tip and there was no search
warrant. In fact, the police were acting on a
‘standing invitation’ from officials of the St.
Clair Catholic District School Board to drop
by their schools whenever they felt like it
and root through the students’ belongings at
will.
No doubt the school officials justified
their ‘policy’ with that tired and shameful
maxim always mouthed by the Babbits
of this world to excuse yet another
surrender of personal sovereignty: “If you’ve
got nothing to hide, you’ve got nothing
to worry about.”
It is a mantra that’s been parroted by Nazis,
Stalinists, Trotskyites, Maoists and other
assorted homicidal control freaks and their
functionaries ad nauseam down through the
ages.
And it’s wrong.
And some Sarnian, praise be, objected when
the random sniffers invaded St. Patrick’s high
school.
And it wound up in court. The case has taken
five and a half years to work its way through
our judicial system, but finally the Supreme
Court of Canada has ruled that, no, police
and their dogs cannot harass ordinary
citizens whenever the spirit moves them.
Specifically, the court ruled "the dogsniff
search (in Sarnia) was unreasonably
undertaken because there was no proper
justification…
“No doubt ordinary businessmen and
businesswomen riding along on public transit
or going up and down on elevators in office
towers would be outraged at any suggestion
that the contents of their briefcases could
randomly be inspected by the police without
‘reasonable suspicion’ of illegality.”
Bang on. About a century ago, an American
Supreme Court justice by the name of Louis
Brandeis said “The right to be left alone is the
most comprehensive of rights and the right
most valued in civilized man.”
Greta Garbo weighed in on the subject, too.
“I never said ‘I want to be alone,’” the famous
actress said. “I only said ‘I want to be left
alone.’
“There is all the difference.”
Indeed there is. But try to explain that to a
German shepherd.
Arthur
Black
Other Views Down boy – or I’ll sue
Residents of the solemn city of Toronto
are being asked to do something
completely unnatural to attract tourists
– smile.
This revolutionary idea has been suggested
as Ontario gears toward what the province is
dropping hints will be its biggest ever push to
lure visitors.
Liberal Premier Dalton McGuinty has
signified its importance by appointing his
former longtime finance minister, Greg
Sorbara, to devise it.
Sorbara resigned his cabinet post a few
months ago because, with the younger
McGuinty still firmly in his job, he has
nowhere higher to go, but he still has the
premier’s trust and ear.
A debate involving politicians and the city’s
chauvinistic news media on what to do to lure
tourists has been going on for weeks. But
typically so far it’s focused almost entirely on
how to improve and market Toronto, which
they see as the centre of the universe.
This is choosing the wrong destination,
because tourists will not be drawn to Ontario
primarily because of Toronto or any of its
cities for that matter.
In this age of easy travel they have many
cities to choose from, including London, Paris
and Rome, with their histories and old world
charm. In the New World, there’s New York,
Boston, San Francisco and others with more
excitement and higher quality theatres,
nightlife and restaurants.
Tourists will be drawn to Ontario first by its
natural blessings, its wide open spaces,
forests, lakes, rivers and wildlife, more
plentiful and accessible than almost anywhere
in the world.
There is of course a role for Toronto as a
place tourists can sample man-made
attractions on their way to or from the beaches
and forests – not the main course, but
a tasty dessert.
The province is concerned particularly by
developments that are deterring tourism, the
most recent being the record high cost of
gasoline, a burden to drivers from the U.S. and
starting to be reflected in airfares.
Others include the stronger Canadian dollar
that forces visitors to pay more in their own
currencies, and tighter security that delays
those crossing the U.S. border.
Strengthening tourism and providing jobs
has become more crucial additionally because
of the loss of jobs in the province, particularly
in manufacturing.
Toronto, which often has boasted it is a
world-class city, suddenly has discovered it
has limitations.
Studies have found many first-time visitors
were disappointed by what they felt was a lack
of attractions and repeat visitors felt there
were not enough new ones.
The city has lost some of the reputation it
had for being clean. Margaret Thatcher, when
British prime minister and an Iron Lady not
noted for handing out compliments, called it
the cleanest city she ever visited.
U.K newspapers reported Torontonians
carefully depositing every chewing gum
wrapper in curbside bins and some downtown
sidewalks being swept half-a-dozen times a
day.
Now litter is more prevalent – almost like
London – and a Toronto newspaper publishes
a daily column identifying dangerous cracks in
sidewalks and bus shelters falling apart and
has no trouble filling it.
Toronto also has become widely known for
shooting deaths. A year ago a newspaper in
New York asked this writer to report on them,
but insisted he should not visit the worst hit
area, because this would be too dangerous.
Toronto unlike some European cities
provides few washrooms for the public and
they are not well kept. Cities get known for
their washrooms.
Toronto officials suggesting residents
should be more welcoming and friendly say as
examples they should stop and offer help when
they see someone fumbling with a map or go
out of their way to explain how the subway
system works.
This would require a large change in attitude
by many Torontonians, who are apt to look
threatened and move on quickly when
someone they don’t know asks them the way
or time.
Most people outside Toronto are friendlier
and more helpful without being asked and this
is another reason more attempts should be
made to steer tourists to other places.
Eric
Dowd
FFrroomm
QQuueeeenn’’ss PPaarrkk
One could think of it as a veritable
smorgasbord of almost natural
perfection. Sure, there may be the odd
side dish that sours the palate, but they are
insignificant when considering the
overwhelming bounty.
Currently, my son is touring out west. The
wonder of the internet has allowed us to follow
along his route pictorially as he has posted a
number of the hundreds of pictures he has
taken. The majesty of the Rockies, the pristine
purity of cool, clear lakes, the woods and
wildlife are, clichéd or not, nothing short of
awe-inspiring. As one individual so eloquently
states below a shot of a craggy mountain
draped in snow, rising into the blue and white
of a lightly clouded sky, “Holy crap, dude! I
love our country!”
Me too. Among my many blessings, I
frequently thank the lucky stars above that I
call this country home. From sea to sea, border
to border, Canada, though certainly not without
its issues, is still the best there is.
Where it seems to fall short is in its people’s
ability to stand tall and be proud of it.
I recently attended a concert, and was a bit
surprised when, at the end of the evening, the
national anthem was played. It was not the
ideal time, certainly. Quite frankly, it wasn’t
the place for it at all. People were revved up or
in cases such as ours thinking of a long drive
ahead of them.
But, as the powers that be decided it was the
perfect time, then one would assume people
would do what’s expected. Yet, I was ashamed
to see the masses continue on their way,
pushing up the stairs to the doors. Not only
were they failing to give our anthem its proper
due, they were ignoring it completely.
Maybe I’m too sensitive, but seriously, can
people not stand still for two minutes to
publicly proclaim their pride in this country? If
not, why?
Even more maddening to me was seeing the
American performer and his band come back
out on stage to take another bow during the
middle of it. Bet that wouldn’t have happened
had it been the Star Spangled Banner coming
over the sound system, I thought.
And the next day decided to prove it. I took
a few minutes to watch some videos of the
American and Canadian national anthems
being played at hockey games. It was the same
in virtually every one. During O’ Canada, a
substantial percentage of the fans cheer, wave,
holler, whether on Canadian or American ice,
while the players fidget, grin, look around. A
rare person can be seen singing. During the
Star Spangled Banner, however, there is a
stillness as all stand at attention, eyes on the
flag, so proudly hailing... what? That they live
in a country where George Bush could get
elected? Twice?
Perhaps. But the Americans always have
taken patriotism to the highest level. It would
be sacrilege to treat their anthem, and therefore
their country the way ours often is.
Most Canadians would agree they live in a
great place. They appreciate the country’s
aesthetic and cultural diversity, that compared
to people in other nations we are blessed with
both natural and economic wealth.
Yet, maybe it’s our humility, but we seem
awkward or reluctant about proclaiming it.
The abundant life Canada provides should
never be taken for granted. It is indeed the true
north strong and free and if that’s not
something to shout to the world I don’t know
what is.
Be proud, stand tall and sing Canada’s
praises.
Spread tourists around the province
Letters Policy
The Citizen welcomes letters to the editor.
Letters must be signed and should include
a daytime telephone number for the purpose
of verification only. Letters that are not signed
will not be printed.
Submissions may be edited for length,
clarity and content, using fair comment as
our guideline. The Citizen reserves the right
to refuse any letter on the basis of unfair bias,
prejudice or inaccurate information. As well,
letters can only be printed as space allows.
Please keep your letters brief and concise.