Loading...
The Citizen, 2008-04-17, Page 22PAGE 22. THE CITIZEN, THURSDAY, APRIL 17, 2008.At a regular board meeting lastweek, community member DeanSmith and West Perth/Perth Southtrustee Carol Bennewies both questioned recommendations from staff of the Avon Maitland District School Board that Mitchell Public School eventually close. And there will be further opportunities for members of the public to voice their concerns when the board hosts a special meeting in the town, tentatively scheduled for Tuesday, April 29. Smith spoke during the public delegation section of last week’s meeting – on Tuesday, April 8 at the board’s Seaforth headquarters. He questioned elements of the staff report – delivered March 31 – recommending Mitchell Public close at a point in the future when there’s sufficient space to accommodate all students at Upper Thames Elementary School (UTES) withoutconstructing a major addition.Of particular concern werereferences to the provincially-mandated “RECAPP” analysis ofprojected costs for maintainingschool facilities over a 10-year period. Smith rejected the report’s treatment of Mitchell Public’s RECAPP needs as a “saving” under a closure scenario, labeling the approach “misleading.” He argued that inclusion on the RECAPP list doesn’t necessarily mean money would have to be spent within that 10-year period “to keep the rain out and the heat in.” It only means that such maintenance projects are part of the “backlog” associated with the building over the long term. Smith also wondered what happened to an initial estimate of a $20,000 increase in transportation costs under the closure scenario – presented to the board-mandated, community-based Accommodation Review Committee (ARC), of whichSmith was a member. The March 31staff report suggested no increase intransportation costs.Under board protocol, trustees andstaff are required not to respondimmediately to inquiries or charges contained in a public delegation like Smith’s. But, interviewed following the April 8 meeting, business superintendent Janet Baird-Jackson referred to the $20,000 figure as “a first-pass estimate” undertaken early in the Mitchell accommodation review process. Further investigation into the possibilities for providing transportation under a closure scenario led to “an updated message,” she said – a message suggesting there wouldn’t be any extra costs. However, operations superintendent Ted Doherty, who presented the March 31 report and chaired the Mitchell ARC meetings on behalf of the board, conceded Smith “has a good point” about the effect of this discrepancy on the finalfigures for potential savings from aclosure.Finally, Smith explained the ARC“went through a lot of wordsmithingin terms of how do we want toexpress our comment” in the committee’s final report to staff. And he complained the closure recommendation – which he referred to as “open-ended” due to the condition of waiting until Mitchell Public enrolment decreases – “does not meet the spirit of the ARC by giving the community a clear answer.” He said a suggestion from staff that enrolment numbers be analyzed each January – leading to a possible implementation of closure by the following September – could affect the viability of community-based users of the Mitchell Public facility. Such organizations, like Perth Care for Kids, “will be constantly wondering ‘when do I need to find alternative facilities?’” Bennewies, citing interaction with community members subsequent to the March 31 staff report, raised additional concerns later in the meeting. She urged staff to make it clear the possibility of moving Grades 7s and 8s into Mitchell District High School is off the table. “We already have congregated Grades 7s and 8s in West Perth,” she noted, referring to the current scenario of Mitchell Public serving Kindergarten-to-Grade 6 and theschool’s students then moving toUTES – a K-8 school – for seniorelementary levels.Trustees are scheduled to vote onthe Mitchell recommendation June10. Trustee questions Mitchell PS recommendations Touring the collection Henry Ford’s Dreams, a Ford collectors’ club out of Milton toured Bud Chamney’s shop over the weekend. Collectors travelled by bus, but came from all over Ontario to arrive at Chamney’s in Auburn. Chamney says he was glad to see them come, saying they stayed for over two hours visiting and touring his collection of antique vehicles and service station memorabilia. (Vicky Bremner photo) Thanks to the combined effects of new Ontario legislation keeping kids in school until age 18, and mandating alternative programming for students who are suspended or expelled, the Avon Maitland District School Board is now projecting a temporary turnaround in its trend of decreased high school enrolment. “In the past, long-term suspension was a pretty good indication of dropping out of school prior to graduation,” explained education superintendent Ted Doherty, following a regular meeting Tuesday, April 8. “Now, the culture is changing.” Doherty told trustees that, “up until recently, if a student was suspended or expelled, a letter would go home saying, ‘you’re not allowed on school property’.” But, in accordance with Feb. 1 amendments to the province’s Safe School Act, alternative programming must be provided for students subject to such disciplinary action. Education Ministry funding was forwarded to school boards in conjunction with the amendments. Doherty says some larger boards used that money to physically create program spaces separate from existing schools. But the Avon Maitland board chose mainly to strengthen partnerships with social service organizations, thereby placing suspended and expelled students “at the front of the line” for out-of- school support. The board also created a new position – a director of student support services – and redirected the efforts of other staff. As a result, many expelled or suspended students continue to attend their school and sometimes see outside service providers on-site, but have their days managed to limit interaction with the rest of the building. “Now, with the new legislation, we have some teeth to deal with those students,” in a manner other than just sending them home, Doherty explained. He added that a separate piece of legislation, “Learning to 18,” dictates that students must receive some sort of education for a longer period than in the past. Also as part of Doherty’s presentation to trustees, fellow superintendent Marie Parsons described Avon Maitland’s participation – along with five other boards across the province – in a pilot project aimed at developing new strategies for dealing with disciplinary or relationship disputes surrounding students with special needs. Planning is ongoing for the Avon Maitland version of the pilot project, which will get underway next September. According to Doherty, the combined effects of these provincial initiatives means the board is no longer projecting decreased numbers of high school students over the next couple of years. Instead, high school enrolments are expected to rise slightly. “And I think the long-term impact will be greater graduation rates,” he commented. AMDSB projects turnaround Old Tyme Country Breakfast Sunday, April 20 9 a.m. - 1 p.m. at Londesborough Hall • Eggs • Bacon • Sausage • Pancakes and Homefries Adults . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $6.00 Children Under 12 . . . . . . . . . $3.00 Sponsored by Londesborough Lions Club Proceeds for Community Betterment Forthcoming Marriage It is with great joy and excitement that Cheryl and Harjinder Nijjar and Andrew and Twyla Rains announce the forthcoming marriage of their daughter, Jessica Sue Anne Rains to Ryan Daniel Montgomery, son of Maureen and Brad Montgomery. The wedding will take place Saturday, September 13, 2008 in Stratford. Pork Roast for JEN GROBBINK & JON TAYLOR Sun., Apr. 27, 2008 from 5:00-7:30pm at the B.M. & G. Community Centre, Brussels Social to follow Adults $15, Children 5-12 $7 Children under 5 free For tickets phone 519-887-6708, 519-887-8657 or 519-524-6437 By Stew SlaterSpecial to The Citizen Continued from page 21 According to MacGowan, the Minister had been interested in assessing the structural integrity of the bridge. “She didn’t make any promises, but she wanted to see why the dam would be important to the area. I think she’s trying to help us make a case for funding.” “By her own admission,” said MacGowan, the project was too much for a small municipality.” “She was also very interested when deputy-reeve Scott mentioned that the dam was once used to produce hydro,” said MacGowan, adding that there was discussion of a micro-generator. “It was a very positive meeting and I walked away with a much better feeling than I thought I would,” said MacGowan. “We’re hopeful.” Council hopeful By Stew Slater Special to The Citizen